The relationship between politics and business administration is neutral, somehow, it may usually be considered as a negative phrase. In general, most people may judge this kind of relationship as something like corruption, bribery and rent-seeking. This research will focus on the example of transferring of control of a Department Store, and use this case to discuss the law, social benefit and traditional cultural issues about the transferring process. The relationship between legislative and business is mutual, not only business-political relationship could affect legislative process, the law itself could also heavily influence the behaviors between politics and business. A proper law could be measured by active and passive aspects, for passive one, it could have enough power to stop corporations from illegal activities; for active one, business law could direct corporations to enrich and fulfill its social responsibilities. Therefore, when the legislative tries to build up some relevant laws for business, it could not be done by only some narrow law-orientated elites but consult various fields of other expertise. The case is a classical one about joint loan of business, in traditional way, the case should be solved by professional bank workgroups. However, during the whole process, this case evolved to a competition of control of corporation between different business clans. Besides, this case also involved some debate about political influence, therefore this case cannot be considered as a pure business event but a more complicated issue.