Esta tese tem por objetivo analisar os processos de semanticização e sintaticização das construções de dupla conjunção no português brasileiro. Tais construções se caracterizam por apresentar uma sequência de elementos conjuncionais sem qualquer intercalação de itens de outra natureza exemplos: MAS SE, E QUANDO, entre outros. A pesquisa baseia-se na proposta de Castilho (2010), que concebe a língua como um sistema complexo, dividido em quatro subsistemas: Gramática, Semântica, Discurso e Léxico, sem que haja hierarquia ou determinações entre eles. A análise contempla questões semânticas e sintáticas das construções de dupla conjunção. Na semântica, busca-se a depreensão dos valores que advêm dos pares conjuncionais e o entendimento de como cada um dos conectores contribui na expressão desses valores. Na sintaxe, enfoca-se a natureza e o modo de construção dessas estruturas complexas e suas características sintáticas. O corpus sob análise é constituído de cartas e inquéritos orais populares, divididos em quatro fases: final do século XIX (cartas particulares); início do século XX (cartas particulares); final do século XX (inquéritos orais e cartas particulares) e início do século XXI (inquéritos orais). As cartas e inquéritos têm em comum os traços de espontaneidade e da oralidade conceptual, nos termos de Koch & Oesterreicher (1985, apud Simões, 2007) / This thesis aims to analyze the processes of semanticization and sintaticization involving constructions of double conjunctions in Brazilian Portuguese. These constructions are characterized by presenting a sequence of conjunctional elements without any intercalation of items of other nature between them - examples: AS IF, AND WHEN, among others. The research is based on Castilhos proposal (2010), which perceives language as a complex system, divided into four subsystems: Grammar, Semantics, Discourse and Lexicon, having no hierarchy or determination among them. The analysis includes semantic and syntactic questions regarding double conjunctions` constructions. In Semantics, we seek to infer the values of conjunctional pairs and to understand how each one of the connectors contributes to the expression of these values. In Syntax, we focus on the nature and the way in which these complex structures are constructed, and some of their syntactic features. The data under analysis is constituted by letters and oral interviews, divided in four phases: end of 19th century (private letters), beginning of 20th century (private letters), end of 20th century (oral interviews and private letters), and beginning of 21th century (oral interviews). The letters and interviews have in common traces of spontaneous speech and conceptual orality, in the terms of Koch & Oesterreicher (1985, apud Simões, 2007)

Esta tese tem por objetivo analisar os processos de semanticização e sintaticização das construções de dupla conjunção no português brasileiro. Tais construções se caracterizam por apresentar uma sequência de elementos conjuncionais sem qualquer intercalação de itens de outra natureza exemplos: MAS SE, E QUANDO, entre outros. A pesquisa baseia-se na proposta de Castilho (2010), que concebe a língua como um sistema complexo, dividido em quatro subsistemas: Gramática, Semântica, Discurso e Léxico, sem que haja hierarquia ou determinações entre eles. A análise contempla questões semânticas e sintáticas das construções de dupla conjunção. Na semântica, busca-se a depreensão dos valores que advêm dos pares conjuncionais e o entendimento de como cada um dos conectores contribui na expressão desses valores. Na sintaxe, enfoca-se a natureza e o modo de construção dessas estruturas complexas e suas características sintáticas. O corpus sob análise é constituído de cartas e inquéritos orais populares, divididos em quatro fases: final do século XIX (cartas particulares); início do século XX (cartas particulares); final do século XX (inquéritos orais e cartas particulares) e início do século XXI (inquéritos orais). As cartas e inquéritos têm em comum os traços de espontaneidade e da oralidade conceptual, nos termos de Koch & Oesterreicher (1985, apud Simões, 2007) / This thesis aims to analyze the processes of semanticization and sintaticization involving constructions of double conjunctions in Brazilian Portuguese. These constructions are characterized by presenting a sequence of conjunctional elements without any intercalation of items of other nature between them - examples: AS IF, AND WHEN, among others. The research is based on Castilhos proposal (2010), which perceives language as a complex system, divided into four subsystems: Grammar, Semantics, Discourse and Lexicon, having no hierarchy or determination among them. The analysis includes semantic and syntactic questions regarding double conjunctions` constructions. In Semantics, we seek to infer the values of conjunctional pairs and to understand how each one of the connectors contributes to the expression of these values. In Syntax, we focus on the nature and the way in which these complex structures are constructed, and some of their syntactic features. The data under analysis is constituted by letters and oral interviews, divided in four phases: end of 19th century (private letters), beginning of 20th century (private letters), end of 20th century (oral interviews and private letters), and beginning of 21th century (oral interviews). The letters and interviews have in common traces of spontaneous speech and conceptual orality, in the terms of Koch & Oesterreicher (1985, apud Simões, 2007)

Ce travail propose d’étudier la mobilisation du parler populaire lors de la couverture médiatique du match Égypte-Algérie par la presse généraliste et la presse spécialisée algérienne. Nos premières observations sur le traitement de l’évènement footballistique nous conduisent à supposer que le discours des journaux d’information générale n’est pas différent de celui des quotidiens de sport. La recherche propose, ainsi, de saisir les stratégies qui encadrent l’usage du parler populaire. Il s’agit d’analyser l’émergence d’une pratique info-communicationnelle qui peut s’inscrire dans une stratégie de pénétration du marché, à la recherche d’un lectorat élargi.L’analyse des jeux d’acteurs médiatiques, dans un contexte marqué par une crise mondiale de la presse écrite, envisage permet de montrer comment ces derniers ont recours au parler populaire, comme dispositif signifiant de captation et argument de vente. Pour appréhender cet enjeu, nous avons privilégié une approche qui ne néglige pas l’étude des identités éditoriales de chaque titre de presse. Nous proposons, de ce fait, de déconstruire les publications de quatre journaux de « référence », en défendant une méthodologie axée sur des aspects théoriques, alimentée par une analyse du discours, combinée à une étude quantifiée de l’évènement et appuyée sur les visions et discours d’autolégitimation sociale des professionnels algériens de l’information médiatique.Mots clés : Évènement médiatique, dispositif, cadre, co-construction, parler populaire, stratégie, tactique, identité éditoriale et loi de proximité. / This work suggests to study the mobilization of popular speech during the media coverage of Egypt-Algeria match by the French-written generalist press and the Algerian specialized press. Our first observations on the treatment of the football event, lead us to suppose that the discourse of the newspapers of general information is not different from the dailies of sport. Thus, the research suggests grasping the strategies which frame the use of popular speech. It consists of analyzing the emergence of a communicational-info practice that can be part of a market penetration strategy seeking for an enlarged readership.The analysis of media acting skills, in press global crisis context foresees to show how they make use of popular speech, as a significant capitation pattern and a selling argument. To apprehend this issue, it seems necessary to situate this work in an approach that does not neglect the study of editorial identities of each press title.Therefore, we suggest to deconstruct the publications of four "reference" newspapers by defending a methodology based on theoretical aspects. That methodology is supplied by discourse analysis combined with quantified study of the event and supported by the visions of Algerian professionals’ media information.Key words: Media event, device, framework, co-construction, popular speech strategy, tactics, editorial identity and proximity law