The Constant Rate of Strain (CRS) test is currently the most widely used method for determination of consolidation parameters in Sweden. These parameters are used to calculate the probable settlements and behavior of soils. With the Swedish standard strain rate, the duration of a single the test is about 24h, but a higher strain rate would allow for more tests to be performed in the same amount of time. For all clays in Sweden, the Swedish standard for the CRS test suggests a fixed rate of strain that is independent of soil properties, while the North American standard proposes a strain rate that generates a pore pressure ratio of 3-15%. Soil properties such as water content, liquid limit, sensitivity and shear strength vary greatly between different regions of Sweden. It would be beneficial if these properties could be used to find the ideal strain rate for the CRS test. Performing the tests at a higher strain rate, and thus performing more tests within a shorter amount of time, would save both time and money. In this report, 24 CRS tests are performed on three different clays with distinctive properties. Each clay is tested with three different strain rates: the Swedish standard rate of 0.680%/h, a higher rate of 3.00%/h and a lower rate of 0.154%/h. The results are evaluated according to both standards, and are compared and analyzed to determine whether there is any indication that the strain rate can be selected based on the soil properties. The results indicate that the selection of the strain rate is dependent on the soil properties. In addition, the majority of the tests can be conducted with higher strain rates than what is required by the Swedish standard and still manage to lie within the 3-15% limit of the pore pressure ratio, which is acceptable for the North American standard. However, the preconsolidation pressure does rise with increased strain rates, which can generate problems and erroneous results when calculating the settlements. A more extensive testing program with CRS tests and full-scale field tests must be carried out before any recommendation of a higher strain rate can be made.

Liquefaction is a costly phenomenon where soil shear modulus degrades as the generation of excess pore pressures begins. One of the methods to mitigate liquefaction, is the use of prefabricated vertical drains. Prefabricated vertical drains provide a drainage path to effectively mitigate the generation of pore pressures and aid in shear modulus recovery. The aims of this study were to define shear modulus degradation vs. shear strain as a function of excess pore pressure ratio; define the effects of prefabricated vertical drains on the behavior of pore pressure generation vs. shear strain; and to define volumetric strain as a function of shear strain and excess pore pressure ratios. A large-scale laminar shear box test was conducted and measured on clean sands with prefabricated vertical drains spaced at 3-feet and 4-feet. The resulting test data was analyzed and compared to data without vertical drains. The results show the effect of increasing excess pore pressure ratios on shear modulus and curves where developed to encompass these effects in design with computer programing like SHAKE or DEEPSOIL. The data also suggests that prefabricated vertical drains effectively mitigate excess pore pressure build-up, thus increased the shear strain resistance before pore pressures were generated. Regarding volumetric strain, the results suggests that the primary factor governing the measured settlement is the excess pore pressure ratio. This indicates that if the drains can reduce the excess pore pressure ratio, then the resulting settlement can successfully be reduced during a shaking event. The curves for shear modulus vs. cyclic shear strain as function of pore pressure ratio were developed using data with high strain and small strain which leaves a gap of data in the cyclic shear strain range of 0.0001 to 0.01. Further large-scale testing with appropriate sensitivity is needed to observe the effect excess pore pressure generation on intermediate levels of cyclic shear strain.

付記する学位プログラム名: グローバル生存学大学院連携プログラム / 京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(工学) / 甲第20340号 / 工博第4277号 / 新制||工||1662(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院工学研究科社会基盤工学専攻 / (主査)教授 寶 馨, 教授 角 哲也, 准教授 佐山 敬洋 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Philosophy (Engineering) / Kyoto University / DFAM

付記する学位プログラム名: グローバル生存学大学院連携プログラム / 京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(工学) / 甲第21056号 / 工博第4420号 / 新制||工||1687(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院工学研究科社会基盤工学専攻 / (主査)教授 寶 馨, 教授 角 哲也, 准教授 佐山 敬洋 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Philosophy (Engineering) / Kyoto University / DFAM

A major concern for geotechnical engineers is the ability to predict how a soil will react to large ground motions produced by earthquakes. Of all the different types of soil, liquefiable soils present some of the greatest challenges. The ability to quantify the degradation of a soil's shear modulus as it undergoes liquefaction would help engineers design more reliably and economically. This thesis uses ground motions recorded by an array of downhole accelerometers on Port Island, Japan, during the 1995 Kobe Earthquake, to quantify the shear modulus of sand as it liquefies. It has been shown that the shear modulus of sand decreases significantly as it liquefies, apparently decreasing in proportion to the increasing excess pore water pressure ratio (Ru). When completely liquefied, the shear modulus of sand (Ru = 1.0) for a relative density of 40 to 50% is approximately 15% of the high-strain modulus of the sand in its non-liquefied state, or 1% of its initial low-strain value. Presented in this thesis is an approach to modeling the shear modulus degradation of sand as it liquefies. This approach, called the "degrading shear modulus backbone curve method" reasonably predicts the hysteretic shear stress behavior of the liquefied sand. The shear stresses and ground accelerations computed using this method reasonably matches those recorded at the Port Island Downhole Array (PIDA) site. The degrading shear modulus backbone method is recommended as a possible method for conducting ground response analyses at sites with potentially liquefiable soils.