Spelling suggestions: "subject:"postcold war"" "subject:"postcolon war""
1 |
From new world order to superpower accommodations : political realism and Russian-European security: security risks, objectives and strategiesTownshend, William Roger January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
The evolution of Russian strategic nuclear doctrine and operations : problems and prospectsClark, Todd January 1998 (has links)
No description available.
|
3 |
French and British aid to Africa : a comparative studyCumming, Gordon January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
4 |
Transforming regional orders : the Helsinki and Barcelona processes comparedXenakis, Dimitris K. January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
Security cooperation in central Europe : Polish viewsWohlfeld, Monika Johanna January 1995 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
The Politics of Peacekeeping: United Kingdom.Woodhouse, Thomas, Ramsbotham, Alexander January 2004 (has links)
No / Much of the scholarly literature on peacekeeping focuses on particular peacekeeping operations, or on the political bargaining between peacekeeping participants at both the institutional and national levels. However, there is very little published research on why nations commit forces to peacekeeping operations. As Sandra Whitworth noted in a book review of six books on peacekeeping in the "International Journal," "t"he important political questions thus far have not been asked: who benefits, who pays, and who is excluded?." "This book addresses that need.
The authors focus specifically on the political and economic motivations that influence the decision to participate in peacekeeping. They consider how definitions of national interest frame the political debate, and what the reasons are for the military support or opposition for peacekeeping operations. They also explore the role of inter-agency politics, the role of public opinion in peacekeeping decisions, and the influence of pressure from other nations and non-nation actors to commit peacekeeping forces. Each chapter includes several recent cases of national peacekeeping to illustrate how national political debates framed their country's political decisions on the commitment of peacekeeping forces. The countries chosen for analysis are Australia, Argentina, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, the United States, Nigeria, Canada, India, and Austria.
|
7 |
The transformation of South Korea's foreign policy 1988-1993 : Nordpolitik, Moscow and the road to PyongyangLho, Cholsoo January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
United States after the Cold War : And its Foreign Policy of the New World OrderNamaganda, Angela January 2014 (has links)
No description available.
|
9 |
Reflexivity in the international system : international institutions and state strategiesHarrison, Ewan January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
10 |
後冷戰時期中美軟權力之較勁 / The Post-Cold War US-China Competitions from the Perspective of Soft Power李興華, Lee, Hsing Hua Unknown Date (has links)
The United States lost its prime opponent, the Soviet Union, since Post-Cold War. To assure its hegemonic status, Joseph Nye initiated the strategy of soft power to former President Bush and Clinton’s administration, and which had influenced People’s Republic of China (as known as a potential enemy to U.S.) profoundly.
Soft power is such a wonderful elementary factor that made a dictatorial state like China a huge change both in its polity and image of the world. Moreover, China had been activated by American strategy of soft power, and eventually developed its own ‘Chinese character’ soft power, which had attracted at least by its peripheral states.
Commensurate with its rapid economic and diplomatic development, China used to be considered as “China’s threat”, then due to China’s soft power strategy in terms of “Confucianism” and “Wang Dao”(benign) thought had been well responded by the world. As a dominated state, maybe it is time for the United States to think about trying not to conduct the soft power as a diplomatic tool only, but to seek a new strategy of soft power that combined tolerance and respect toward the others. Anyway, by the engagement of soft power among international relations, and the interdependency of regional economy, the author has an optimistic view for a harmonious world in the future.
Key words: Post-Cold War, soft power, China’s threat, Wang Dao, harmonious world. / The United States lost its prime opponent, the Soviet Union, since Post-Cold War. To assure its hegemonic status, Joseph Nye initiated the strategy of soft power to former President Bush and Clinton’s administration, and which had influenced People’s Republic of China (as known as a potential enemy to U.S.) profoundly.
Soft power is such a wonderful elementary factor that made a dictatorial state like China a huge change both in its polity and image of the world. Moreover, China had been activated by American strategy of soft power, and eventually developed its own ‘Chinese character’ soft power, which had attracted at least by its peripheral states.
Commensurate with its rapid economic and diplomatic development, China used to be considered as “China’s threat”, then due to China’s soft power strategy in terms of “Confucianism” and “Wang Dao”(benign) thought had been well responded by the world. As a dominated state, maybe it is time for the United States to think about trying not to conduct the soft power as a diplomatic tool only, but to seek a new strategy of soft power that combined tolerance and respect toward the others. Anyway, by the engagement of soft power among international relations, and the interdependency of regional economy, the author has an optimistic view for a harmonious world in the future.
Key words: Post-Cold War, soft power, China’s threat, Wang Dao, harmonious world.
|
Page generated in 0.0622 seconds