研究目的 失眠的過度激發是目前最廣為接受的失眠病因之一。無論在生理、認知、行為三不同層面上，多可觀察到失眠者有身心過度激發的狀態。根據失眠三因子模式，不同失眠病程階段，影響過度激發的背後成因有所差異。在慢性失眠部分，過 去累積了相當多的實證研究證實其過度激發的現象，但尚未進入慢性病程前之過度激發相關機轉，仍有待研究進一步探討。本研究嘗試以橫斷式的研究方法，並依據過去失眠病因發展推導，選擇從壓力反應特性 (包含壓力操弄後的壓力反應強度和 消退速度)、注意力偏誤 (包含警覺性注意力和注意力移除困難)、與睡前的睡眠監控行為三個面向切入，探討不同病程階段個體過度激發的背後機轉，並進一步檢驗上述之差異是否可用以預測在壓力操弄情境下，不同病程個體睡前的激發反應變化，藉此檢驗失眠病程發展之病因假說，並希望未來可據此發展有效之失眠防治與介入策略。 研究方法 本研究共計招募受試者 58 人，年齡介於 24-48 歲，包含符合 ICSD-3 慢性失眠者 18 人，以及以壓力下失眠反應量表( Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test; FIRST)區分出急性失眠高危險組 19 人與低危險組 21 人。每位受試者皆需到睡眠實驗室進行兩階段的實驗，第一階段包含晤談評估、問卷填答、壓力反應的生理測量(以指溫與膚電為指標)、與包含威脅與睡眠刺激之點偵測注意力作業，之後需配戴腕錶與記錄睡眠日誌配合充足且規律作息一週後，再到睡眠實驗室進行第二階段的評量，包含睡前 2 小時、1 小時、關燈前生理指標 (指溫、膚電) 與腦波的測量和主觀身心激發狀態 (Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale, 簡稱 PSAS) 評量，於睡前填寫睡眠相關監測指標 (Sleep Associated Monitoring Index，簡稱 SAMI)，並完成一晚的 PSG 測量以排除其他睡眠相關疾患。 研究結果 首先，以單因子變異數分析比較不同組別間在壓力反應與回復和二因子變異數分析注意力警覺/移除困難指標的差異。在壓力生理反應表現上，慢性失眠組與高危險組在接受壓力操弄後的激發消退時間較低危險組來得長。在注意力層面，高危險組對壓力(威脅圖片) 刺激有顯著的警覺與移除困難注意力偏誤，慢性失眠組則是對睡眠刺激有顯著的移除困難注意力偏誤。在行為層面，慢性失眠組與高危險組睡前的注意力監控行為 (包含監測自身身體感覺訊息是否與入睡狀態不一致、鬧鐘 時間、環境) 均顯著較低危險組來得多。再者，以皮爾森相關探討注意力偏誤與睡前激發反應之關聯性，結果顯示高危險組的注意力偏誤現象與睡前高頻腦波與主觀生理激發的降幅呈現顯著負相關; 而慢性失眠組的注意力偏誤指標卻與膚電、主觀認知激發的降幅呈顯著正相關。 結論 本研究結果支持不同失眠病程背後的過度激發影響機制有所差異，生理層面較慢的激發消退能力與對壓力源的認知偏誤的前置因子，可能為急性失眠者易受日常壓力源誘發睡眠困擾之原因；而影響慢性失眠族群的持續因子主要在於其將睡眠視 為壓力源的認知歷程與行為轉變。此外，研究更進一步發現兩組分別對於壓力與睡眠的注意力轉移困難，使其在覺察壓力後易持續表現出過度激發現象。本研究結果除支持失眠過度激發理論之外，更釐清不同階段失眠的認知歷程的機制，並彰顯不 同失眠病程介入策略應有所差異，和急性失眠高危險族群及早介入預防之重要性。 / Introduction Hyperarousal has been recognized to be a major etiological factor of chronic insomnia. Cumulated research evidences have demonstrated that chronic insomnia patients are hyperaroused in somatic, cognitive, and behavioral aspects. According to Spielman’s 3P Model of Insomnia, there were different factors are involved at different points during the course of insomnia. However, there are seldom study to investigate the difference mechanism of hyperarousal in the course of the development of insomnia. The present study used cross-sectional design to compare the difference of good sleeper (low sleep vulnerability, LV), acute insomnia (high sleep vulnerability, HV), and chronic insomnia (CI) in stress reaction (eg. reactivity and recovery), attentional bias (eg. vigilance and disengagement), and sleep associated monitoring behaviors to investigate the underlying mechanism of hyperarousal. Furthermore, the study examined the correlation between attentional bias indices and subsequent pre-sleep arousal to investigate the impact of attentional bias on sleep in different groups. Method The present study recruited fifty-eight subjects, aged between 24-48. They included eighteen chronic insomniacs (CI) diagnosed ICSD-3, nineteen healthy individuals scoring high (HV) and twenty-one healthy individuals scoring low (LV) on the Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test (FIRST). All subjects visited sleep lab twice. During the first visit, the subjects filled in a package of questionnaires, and went through psychophysiological recording (including) of stress reaction, and a visual dot-probe task. They then were required to keep a sleep log and wear actigraphy at home for one-week to make sure they followed a regular sleep schedule. During the second visit, subjects went through a pre-sleep physiological recording (including peripheral temperature, skin conductance, and EEG) and filled in two questionnaires (Pre Sleep Arousal Scale [PSAS] and Sleep Associated Monitoring Index[SAMI]) at three time points and had a PSG recording to screen for sleep disorders. Result One-way ANOVAs were conducted to compare the differences of stress reaction/recovery among three groups. Two-way ANOVAs were used to compare the differences in attentional bias (vigilance/ disengagement) of threatening and sleep-related stimulus among three groups. In stress related physiological activity, CI and HV showed slower recovery rate than LV. Considering attentional bias, HV had significant vigilance and disengagement bias to threatening pictures, and CI had significant disengagement bias to sleep-related pictures. CI and HV also showed more prevalent sleep-associated monitoring behaviors than LV. Furthermore, Spearman’s correlation was used to examine the association between attentional bias and pre-sleep arousal. The result shows the attentional bias of HV had negative correlation with reduction of high frequency EEG and somatic sub-score on the PSAS. In contrast to our prediction, CI showed positive correlation between decrease of skin conductance and the cognitive sub-score on the PSAS. Conclusion The study showed that stress recovery ability and stress-related attentional bias were the major differences between individuals with low and high sleep vulnerability, indicating that increased information processing to threats and stress-related stimulus as well as decreased recovery ability of autonomic arousal in reacting to stress may predisposed an individual to stress-related sleep disturbances. On the other hand, the attention shift from threat toward sleep can differentiate chronic insomnia from those individual with frequent acute insomnia. Moreover, the difficulty in disengagement from sleep-related stimulus, rather the vigilance, might explain the cause of hyperarousal that perpetuate insomnia. The results support the transition of arousal from general treat to sleep-related stimulus in the development of chronic insomnia. The study not only further the understanding of the etiological mechanism of insomnia, but also imply that different strategies should be applied in the treatment of acute and chronic insomnia. It also highlights the importance of preventive intervention for individuals with high sleep vulnerability

過去研究顯示負向情緒會干擾夜間睡眠，預期可有效降低負向情緒的情緒調節策略應有助於睡眠，然而，認知再評估策略對睡眠的影響卻未有一致的研究結果，此可能受限於過去研究多以問卷測量認知再評估策略的使用偏好，卻未測量個體使用策略的能力，亦即認知再評估策略的調節效果。本研究透過實驗室典範測量認知再評估能力，主要探討個體使用認知再評估策略的能力是否會影響個體於夜間情緒調節的效果，以及再評估策略於睡前之適用性。本研究受試者共24位，包含11名男性與13名女性，平均年齡為22歲。受試者皆依序經歷引發和調節負向情緒的實驗情境與中性情境兩個夜晚，並以主觀問卷與客觀生理反應測量受試者使用認知再評估策略調節情緒的表現，及對其後續睡眠的影響，在兩晚作業結束後，受試者會回到實驗室進行認知再評估能力測量作業。研究結果發現，認知再評估能力佳者於實驗晚的情緒調節表現較佳，在能力指標中，正負向與憤怒感調節佳者，其睡前生理激發度增加量較低、入睡前高頻腦波相對功率較低，且較不會高估入睡耗時；此外，運用再評估策略會增加較高情緒控制感者，入睡後高頻腦波相對功率較低，且實驗晚所增加的入睡耗時較低。整體來說，負向情緒會干擾後續睡眠，於正負向指標上調節能力佳者較可減少其主觀失眠困擾度，且使用再評估策略後有較高情緒控制感者，較可彈性的運用再評估策略。 / Negative emotion has been showed to interfere with sleep, therefore effective emotion regulation to reduce negative emotion prior to sleep could be beneficial for sleep. Cognitive reappraisal is generally considered to be an effective and adaptive emotion-regulation strategy, but previous studies had inconsistent findings about the impact of reappraisal on sleep. A study has even found that insomnia patients had a higher frequency to use reappraisal in comparison to good sleepers. However, previous studies used self-report measure of an individual's tendency to use reappraisal. It has been shown that the frequency of using reappraisal did not correlate with the ability to use reappraisal as measured by reduction of stress reactivity after standard laboratory challenge. The present study examined the hypothesis that the impact of pre-sleep reappraisal on sleep onset process depends on individual's cognitive reappraisal ability (CRA). Twenty-four normal sleepers were recruited (male:11, female:13, average age: 22 years). Participants came to sleep laboratory for two experimental nights and one daytime reappraisal ability evaluation. For the two experimental nights, participants did a cognitive task and got two different feedbacks for the two conditions: either a neutral feedback (baseline condition night) or a negative feedback (experimental condition night). They were instructed to use cognitive reappraisal strategy to reduce negative emotion after getting negative feedback. The change of subjective emotion ratings and physiological reaction were measured during the presleep task. Polysomnographic recording and subjective ratings of sleep onset experience was conducted for the sleep onset process analysis. During the daytime session, the ability of the participants to use reappraisal was measured with physiological reactivity to a standard laboratory challenge with anger-inducing films. The results showed that, at experimental night, participants with high CRA in reducing emotion valence exhibited better emotion regulation outcomes, less presleep somatic arousal increments, lower beta power before falling asleep, and less overestimation of their sleep onset latency (SOL). Besides, participants with high CRA in reducing dominance of emotion exhibited shorter emotion regulation time, lower beta power after falling asleep, and lesser SOL increments. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that reappraisal ability would determined whether cognitive reappraisal strategy is adaptive for presleep emotion regulation; those individuals with better CRA in reducing dominance of emotion might have more flexibility in applying reappraisal strategy.

研究目的：在現今高壓力與忙碌的社會中，失眠是很常見的問題。在國外的失眠的相關調查結果顯示，失眠的盛行率會受對於失眠定義之嚴謹程度影響，而有大範圍的變異，其範圍約落在6~48%。當定義符合臨床上之診斷標準時，失眠盛行率約降至6~15%。因此，受失眠之苦的個體中，有一大部分可能未達診斷標準，而為暫時性或急性失眠之患者。然而過去的研究大多將重點聚焦在符合失眠疾患診斷的失眠族群上，針對剩下雖未符合失眠疾患診斷標準，但又飽受失眠症狀困擾之群體，卻是缺乏探討。此外，失眠的縱貫研究中也發現，暫時性失眠個體到最後會有一部份會發展成為慢性失眠。因此，針對這群為數不少，且容易經歷暫時性失眠之個體，若能更加了解其暫時性失眠發生的成因與相關機制，便能及早介入，協助個體不落入慢性失眠的惡性循環中。過去研究發現，暫時性失眠的發生，最常見的促發因素為壓力事件。Drake、Richardson、Roehrs、Scofield與Roth（2004）便發展出福特壓力失眠反應量表（Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test, FIRST）來測量個體特質上遭遇壓力情境的睡眠脆弱程度；且研究結果也發現個體身心激發程度是和睡眠脆弱特質息息相關的因素之一。由於過去在失眠的相關研究中，少有研究探討暫時性失眠的相關機制，因此，本研究從和暫時性失眠相關的壓力下睡眠脆弱特質出發，探討此脆弱特質與過度激發的關聯性，並欲探討其他會提升激發程度的相關認知與情緒因子，如：失功能信念、情緒反應性、反芻特質、情緒遲惰特質和此特質間的關係。本研究假設個體對於睡眠的失功能信念與對負向事件的情緒反應性可能會透過提高睡前身心的激發程度，而使個體容易經歷壓力下的急性失眠，增加睡眠的脆弱性；即睡前身心激發程度在睡眠的失功能信念與情緒反應性對睡眠脆弱性的關係間扮演一中介作用之角色。另外，也假設睡眠的失功能信念與情緒反應性與睡前身心激發程度間的關係，會分別受反芻特質與情緒遲惰特質調節，即具有高反芻特質與高情緒遲惰特質者，其睡眠的失功能信念與情緒反應性與睡前身心激發程度間的關係更強烈，因此在壓力下，其有較高的睡眠脆弱性，容易經歷暫時性失眠。 研究方法：本研究於大學中招募60位20~35歲之受試者（男：22位；女：38位），經晤談以確認受試者符合收案標準後，將請受試者填寫研究相關問卷（包含：壓力下失眠反應量表、反芻型反應風格短版量表、睡前激發程度量表、睡眠失功能信念及態度簡式量表、情緒反應量表、失眠嚴重度量表、貝克憂鬱量表第二版與貝克焦慮量表）；並在詳細解釋情緒經驗取樣流程後，請受試者回到日常生活環境中進行連續三天的情緒遲惰經驗取樣紀錄。 研究結果：根據執行檢驗中介效果步驟的階層迴歸與Sobel test的分析結果，睡前認知激發程度對擔憂的失功能信念與情緒持續性和睡眠脆弱性間的關係具中介的作用；即對睡眠有過度擔憂的失功能信念、情緒持續性較久皆可能會提高睡前認知激發程度而增加壓力下的睡眠脆弱性。其他失功能信念之向度，如：知覺失眠造成的影響、對睡眠的期待、藥物使用，以及情緒反應性之其他向度，如：情緒敏感度與情緒激發度對睡前認知過度激發狀態無顯著的預測力。另外，根據執行檢驗調節效果步驟的階層迴歸分析結果，反芻特質與情緒遲惰特質分別在失功能信念與情緒反應性對認知激發程度的關係上，皆未有顯著的調節效果。 研究結論：研究結果部分支持身心激發程度為對睡眠的失功能信念與情緒反應性影響壓力下睡眠脆弱性的中介因子之假設。本研究發現過度擔憂睡眠的信念以及情緒持續度較久這兩個因子會分別獨立地提高睡前認知激發程度，顯示睡前認知激發程度分別受認知與情緒因素影響；且相較與睡前的生理激發狀態，睡前的認知激發對於壓力下的失眠反應之影響具有顯著的預測力，顯示認知激發在失眠的前置因子中可能扮演較重要的角色。另外，反芻特質與情緒遲惰特質分別在失功能信念與情緒反應性對認知激發程度的關係上，皆未有顯著的調節效果，此部份不符合研究預期。基於本研究結果，在臨床上對於容易經歷失眠之個體，若能及早調整對於睡眠的擔憂相關的信念，並學習有效調節情緒的方式，皆可有效降低個體睡前的認知激發活動，減少失眠的發生率與改善失眠症狀，避免使其落入失眠慢性化的惡性循環中。