• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

A Survey of Heat Shock Protein Length Variation Within and Between Species of Drosophila

McMillan, William 09 1900 (has links)
<p> Forty iso-females lines of Drosophila melanogaster were surveyed by SDS-PAGE for length polymorphisms in their heat shock proteins. None was observed. The 70K and 27K HSP's were further analyzed by peptide mapping using Staphylococcus aureas va protease, acid hydrolysis and chymotrypsin. Again, no variation was observed. </p> <p> Thirty-seven species of Drosophila were surveyed for length variation in their heat shock proteins by SDS-PAGE. No variation was observed in HSP84 or HSP70 among any of the species. HSP36 was shown to vary in mobility only, especially among species from different species groups. The small HSP's showed the greatest interspecies variation, especially in the Repleta and Virilis groups. This variation included mobility and band number differences. </p> <p> The results from the 36K HSP's were used to construct a Drosophila species group phylogeny. These groups, shown in descending order of age, are Saltans, Victoria, Melanogaster, Willistoni, Repleta, and Virilis. </p> / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc)
2

Variation in length of proteins by repeats and disorder regions

Sagit, Rauan January 2013 (has links)
Protein-coding genes evolve together with their genome and acquire changes, some of which affect the length of their protein products. This explains why equivalent proteins from different species can exhibit length differences. Variation in length of proteins during evolution arguably presents a large number of possibilities for improvement and innovation of protein structure and function. In order to contribute to an increased understanding of this process, we have studied variation caused by tandem domain duplications and insertions or deletions of intrinsically disordered residues. The study of two proteins, Nebulin and Filamin, together with a broader study of long repeat proteins (&gt;10 domain repeats), began by confirming that tandem domains evolve by internal duplications. Next, we show that vertebrate Nebulins evolved by duplications of a seven-domain unit, yet the most recent duplications utilized different gene parts as duplication units. However, Filamin exhibits a checkered duplication pattern, indicating that duplications were followed by similarity erosions that were hindered at particular domains due to the presence of equivalent binding motifs. For long repeat proteins, we found that human segmental duplications are over-represented in long repeat genes. Additionally, domains that have formed long repeats achieved this primarily by duplications of two or more domains at a time. The study of homologous protein pairs from the well-characterized eukaryotes nematode, fruit fly and several fungi, demonstrated a link between variation in length and variation in the number of intrinsically disordered residues. Next, insertions and deletions (indels) estimated from HMM-HMM pairwise alignments showed that disordered residues are clearly more frequent among indel than non-indel residues. Additionally, a study of raw length differences showed that more than half of the variation in fungi proteins is composed of disordered residues. Finally, a model of indels and their immediate surroundings suggested that disordered indels occur in already disordered regions rather than in ordered regions. / <p>At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 2: In press. Paper 4: Manuscript.</p>

Page generated in 0.0623 seconds