During the synthesis of secretory and membrane proteins, polypeptides move through a universally conserved protein-conducting channel, formed by the Sec61/SecY complex that is located in the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum membrane or the prokaryotic plasma membrane. The channel operates in two different modes depending on its binding partners. In co-translational translocation, a pathway found in all organisms, the channel associates with a translating ribosome. In post-translational translocation, the channel cooperates with either the Sec62–Sec63 complex in eukaryotes or the SecA ATPase in bacteria. Despite tremendous progress in our understanding of protein translocation over the past decades, many questions about its mechanism remain to be answered. These include (1) how the channel maintains the membrane barrier for small molecules while transporting large proteins, (2) what is the functional implication of channel oligomerization, and (3) how the channel interacts with binding partners and polypeptide substrates during translocation. To address these questions, we developed a novel in vivo method to generate both co- and post-translation translocation intermediates in intact Escherichia coli cells, such that polypeptide chains are only partially translocated through the channel. Using this method, we first demonstrated that a translocating polypeptide itself blocks small molecules from passing through an open SecY channel. A hydrophobic pore ring surrounding the polypeptide chain is vital for maintaining the membrane barrier during translocation. Next, we examined the importance of SecY oligomerization in protein translocation. Crosslinking experiments showed that SecY molecules interact with each other in native membranes, but that this self-association is greatly decreased upon insertion of polypeptide substrates. We also showed that SecY mutants that cannot form oligomers are still functional in vivo. Collectively, our data indicate that a single copy of SecY is sufficient for protein translocation. Finally, we isolated an intact co-translational translocation intermediate from E. coli cells and analyzed its structure by cryo-electron microscopy. An initial map shows a translating ribosome containing all three tRNAs is bound to one copy of the SecY channel. Analysis of a large dataset is ongoing in order to understand the structural basis of how the channel interacts with the ribosome and translocating nascent chain.

We have developed a novel, sensitive and less time-consuming method to detect activity of the SecA-dependent protein-conducting channels. Nanogram levels of E. coli inverted membrane vesicles were injected into Xenopus oocytes, and ionic currents were recorded using the two-electrode voltage clamp. Currents were observed only in the presence of E. coli SecA in conjunction with E. coli membranes. The observed currents showed outward rectification in the presence of KCl as permeable ions and were significantly enhanced by coinjection with the precursor protein, proOmpA, or active LamB signal peptide. Channel activity was blockable with sodium azide or adenylyl 5’-(β, γ-methylene)-diphosphonate, a non-hydrolyzable ATP analog, both of which are known to inhibit SecA protein activity. Channel activity was also stimulated by oocyte endogenous precursor proteins, which could be inhibited by puromycin. In the presence of puromycin, exogenous proOmpA or LamB signal peptides, but not defective signal peptides, stimulated the ionic currents. We also measured SecA-dependent currents with membranes depleted of SecYEG. Wild-type LamB signal peptides, or precursor proteins stimulated ionic currents following a co-injection of SecYEG¯ membranes with puromycin. Excess exogenous SecA stimulated ionic currents through SecYEG¯ membranes. Similar activities of added SecA were observed with reconstituted membranes depleted of SecYEG. Currents through such SecYEG-depleted membranes were also stimulated by addition of defective LamB signal peptides and unfolded mature PhoA protein. In contrast, currents produced by the membranes containing wild-type SecYEG were not so stimulated, but ionic currents were stimulated through mutant strains, similar to PrlA (SecY) suppressors, e.g. PrlA4, or PrlA665 membranes, suggesting that the proofreading function of SecY was bypassed in these membranes. We have observed that azide can inhibit ionic currents when E. coli wild-type MC4100 membranes were injected with proOmpA or LamB signal peptides into Xenopus oocytes. However, such inhibition was lost when observed with oocyte-endogenous signal peptides in the absence of bacterial signal peptides. Moreover, azide did not show complete inhibition upon using SecYEG¯ membranes or SecYEG¯ reconstituted membranes plus excess SecA in the presence or absence of LamB signal peptides. Such conformational alterations reflect different sensitivity in response to azide during the opening of protein-conducting channels.