Enligt skolverkets betygsstatistik, för gymasiet, visar det sig att pojkar har bättre betyg än flickor i ämnet idrott och hälsa (Skolverket, 2010). Skolverkets rapport (2005) visar att ämnet uppfattas som ett ”pojkämne”, eftersom pojkarna tillåts ta mer plats och dominera undervisningen. Denna pojkdominans ser man bara i ämnet idrott och hälsa (Skolverket, 2010). Syftet för den här studien är att undersöka hur sex lärare diskuterar betygsättningen, med utgångspunkt från påståendet att pojkar har högre betyg än flickor i idrott och hälsa. Undersökningen visade att lärarnas uttal går att kopplas till Giddens struktureringsteori och hans syn på genusproblematiken (Giddens, 2003; Hermann, 2004). Schenkers (2009) idrottsdidaktiska analysverktyg bidrar till en förståelse kring problemet utifrån lärarnas uttalanden. Struktureringsteorin påverkade allra mest, eftersom majoriteten av valda lärare uttalade sig om att många lever kvar i ”det gamla tänket” (Hermann, 2004). En struktur i undervisningen som gynnar främst pojkarna, vilket kunde kopplas till två lärares uttalande. En annan faktor var den kring genus-problematiken där en lärare, enligt utsagor, skapar en hierarki där det manliga könet dominerar och disciplinerar rummet (Giddens, 2003). Idrottsdidaktik som analysverktyg används för att poängtera hur undervisningens anatomi bör struktureras (Schenker, 2009). I förhållande till den idrottsdidaktiska analysen visar två lärares uttalanden att deras undervisning brister, då deras utsagor visar på en felaktig användning av läroplanen (2011). / The statistical evidence, regaring the assesment in high school P.E., shows that boys have better grades than girls (Skolverket, 2010). The report from Skolveket (2005) shows that the subject is percieved as predominant by boys, because they are allowed to take more place and dominate. This dominance appears only in this subject (Skolverket, 2010). Our aim for this survey is to analyze how six teachers discuss the assessment, with the statement that boys have higher grades than girls. Our survey showed that there is a connection to Giddens structuraltheory and his views on the problematization of gender (Giddens, 2003; Hermann, 2004). Schenkers (2009) sportsdidactics as an analyzing tool contributes to the acknowledgement of the problems, according to the statements of the teachers. The structuraltheory had the most effect, because the majority of the teachers we investigated uttered that many teachers worked with an ”outdated thinking” (Hermann, 2004). This educational structure primarily promotes boys, according to two teachers. Another factor for effect was the problematic of gender, due to a teachers statement, using hierarchy teaching in wich the male gender dominates and disciplines (Giddens, 2003). Sportsdidactics as an analyzing tool is used to point out the anatomy and structure of teaching (Schenker, 2009). In reference to the sports didactics analysis, the statement of two teachers showed that their teaching flawed, due to the statements showing an inaccurate use of the curriculum (2011).

Title: A systematic review of pain assessment tools Objectives: The aim of this thesis is to create a systematic review of the most widely used multidimensional tools (questionnaires) for assessing pain in patients with nonspecific pain of the cervical and lumbar spine. From the available sources, describe their use, the purpose it was generated for, their reliability, validity, and finally arrange the questionnaires from the most used and assess their advantages and disadvantages for use in clinical practice of physiotherapist. Method: The thesis is processed through a systematic review. The subject of the thesis are pain evaluating tools, especially in the cervical and lumbar spine. The studies containing questionnaires used to assess pain in the cervical and lumbar spine were searched out. Data extraction was carried out according to pre-specified criteria. Unsatisfactory studies were excluded. After the relevant questionnaires selection a content analysis of each tool was conducted, built a systematic review of the most commonly used questionnaires and their critical evaluation. Results: On the basis of the entire set of relevant studies I described and evaluated 14 questionnaires. Five of them are designed specifically for low back pain. They are the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire,...