Spelling suggestions: "subject:"reformatories"" "subject:"reformatorios""
1 |
Patterns of change in epistemic frameworks : a reformational perspective / Ruth Ananka LoubserLoubser, Ruth Ananka January 2012 (has links)
The aim of this project is to discern possible patterns in the changes of epistemic frameworks and in the
way in which factors cause or stimulate such changes. Article 1 illustrates forms of consensus between
the views of various prominent 20th century philosophers of science on the characteristics and functions
of pre-scientific frameworks in scientific activity. This is done by highlighting various helpful insights
from the reformational tradition as a point of departure. Article 2 attempts to achieve more clarity on
how changes in epistemic frameworks occur, whilst article 3 discerns the factors influencing framework
change. Article 4 illustrates and evaluates the relationship between change and constancy in the
viewpoints of various philosophers and scientists throughout history. The project suggests that change
and constancy can be related to epistemic frameworks according to a pattern referring to the
irreducibility of coherents where change and constancy exist in cohesion. As a consequence, change is
never completely random or absolute. Although a broad variety of factors play a role in framework
changes, a pattern can be discerned in the sense that some factors play a regulative role, so that change
is dynamic but not arbitrary. / Thesis (PhD (Philosophy))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013
|
2 |
Patterns of change in epistemic frameworks : a reformational perspective / Ruth Ananka LoubserLoubser, Ruth Ananka January 2012 (has links)
The aim of this project is to discern possible patterns in the changes of epistemic frameworks and in the
way in which factors cause or stimulate such changes. Article 1 illustrates forms of consensus between
the views of various prominent 20th century philosophers of science on the characteristics and functions
of pre-scientific frameworks in scientific activity. This is done by highlighting various helpful insights
from the reformational tradition as a point of departure. Article 2 attempts to achieve more clarity on
how changes in epistemic frameworks occur, whilst article 3 discerns the factors influencing framework
change. Article 4 illustrates and evaluates the relationship between change and constancy in the
viewpoints of various philosophers and scientists throughout history. The project suggests that change
and constancy can be related to epistemic frameworks according to a pattern referring to the
irreducibility of coherents where change and constancy exist in cohesion. As a consequence, change is
never completely random or absolute. Although a broad variety of factors play a role in framework
changes, a pattern can be discerned in the sense that some factors play a regulative role, so that change
is dynamic but not arbitrary. / Thesis (PhD (Philosophy))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013
|
3 |
A trinitarian modal-spherical method of apologetics : an attempt to combine the vantilian method of apologetics with reformational philosophy / Guilherme BraunBraun, Guilherme January 2014 (has links)
The task of a reformed apologetics is the application of both theology and philosophy in the confrontation with unbelievers, bridging the gap between the natural man and the Gospel of Christ and trying to do justice to the multi-aspectual, existential and constitutive sides of created reality. In the Festschrift of Cornelius Van Til, two well-known reformational philosophers, Herman Dooyeweerd of the Netherlands and Hendrik Stoker of South Africa, among others, discussed with Van Til the methodology of Christian apologetics (Jerusalem and Athens 1971: viii).
The investigation focus on the reflections of Dooyeweerd and Stoker on Van Til’s method, which attempted to break away from classical methods and to reform apologetics biblically. Thence, constructive criticisms, methodological integration of reformational insights and the opening up of new avenues of apologetic discourse follows after a structural evaluation of the dialogue between the three thinkers, leading to a Trinitarian, Modal-spherical method (TMSA) of apologetics, while still presupposing the biblical and triune essence of Van Til’s pressuppositional apologetics. After absorbing and integrating inter-related elements in its Trinitarian framework, the new method of apologetics will be introduced to broader Christianity via two integralist accounts of traditional Christian philosophy, both inspired by an interpretation Neo-Thomism, which in many respects correspond to the Neo-Calvinist vision. So that after non-dualistically expanding TMSA’s methodological foundation and scope of interaction non-, it can be briefly introduced to other nuances of apologetics at the final step of the thesis, in the hope of contributing for the ongoing reformation of the Church and its apologetic endevour. / MA (Missiology), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
|
4 |
A trinitarian modal-spherical method of apologetics : an attempt to combine the vantilian method of apologetics with reformational philosophy / Guilherme BraunBraun, Guilherme January 2014 (has links)
The task of a reformed apologetics is the application of both theology and philosophy in the confrontation with unbelievers, bridging the gap between the natural man and the Gospel of Christ and trying to do justice to the multi-aspectual, existential and constitutive sides of created reality. In the Festschrift of Cornelius Van Til, two well-known reformational philosophers, Herman Dooyeweerd of the Netherlands and Hendrik Stoker of South Africa, among others, discussed with Van Til the methodology of Christian apologetics (Jerusalem and Athens 1971: viii).
The investigation focus on the reflections of Dooyeweerd and Stoker on Van Til’s method, which attempted to break away from classical methods and to reform apologetics biblically. Thence, constructive criticisms, methodological integration of reformational insights and the opening up of new avenues of apologetic discourse follows after a structural evaluation of the dialogue between the three thinkers, leading to a Trinitarian, Modal-spherical method (TMSA) of apologetics, while still presupposing the biblical and triune essence of Van Til’s pressuppositional apologetics. After absorbing and integrating inter-related elements in its Trinitarian framework, the new method of apologetics will be introduced to broader Christianity via two integralist accounts of traditional Christian philosophy, both inspired by an interpretation Neo-Thomism, which in many respects correspond to the Neo-Calvinist vision. So that after non-dualistically expanding TMSA’s methodological foundation and scope of interaction non-, it can be briefly introduced to other nuances of apologetics at the final step of the thesis, in the hope of contributing for the ongoing reformation of the Church and its apologetic endevour. / MA (Missiology), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
|
Page generated in 0.1128 seconds