Spelling suggestions: "subject:"remotesensing"" "subject:"remotesetting""
1661 |
Modeling Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) in Subalpine and Alpine Lakes With GIS and Remote SensingWinn, Neil Thomas 28 April 2008 (has links)
No description available.
|
1662 |
Detecting an invasive shrub in deciduous forest understories using remote sensingWilfong, Bryan N. 11 August 2008 (has links)
No description available.
|
1663 |
Post-fire Vegetative Regrowth Associated with Mature Tree Stands and Topography on Sofa MountainO'Connor, Erin E. 01 June 2015 (has links)
No description available.
|
1664 |
Investigations of GNSS-R for Ocean Wind, Sea Surface Height, and Land Surface Remote SensingPark, Jeonghwan January 2017 (has links)
No description available.
|
1665 |
Remote Sensing of Water Quality Parameters Influencing Coral Reef Health, U.S. Virgin IslandsSchlaerth, Hannah L. 11 May 2018 (has links)
No description available.
|
1666 |
Evaluation of the potential to estimate river discharge using measurements from the upcoming SWOT missionYoon, Yeosang 19 December 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
1667 |
Evaluating 25 Years of Environmental Change Using a Combined Remote Sensing Earth Trends Modeling Approach: A Northern California Case StudyDeWalt, Heather A. January 2011 (has links)
No description available.
|
1668 |
A Locally Adaptive Spatial Interpolation Technique for the Generation of High-Resolution DEMsDhanasekaran, Deepananthan 22 July 2011 (has links)
No description available.
|
1669 |
Identifying Subsurface Tile Drainage Systems Utilizing Remote Sensing TechniquesThompson, James January 2010 (has links)
No description available.
|
1670 |
<b>INFERRING STRUCTURAL INFORMATION FROM MULTI-SENSOR SATELLITE DATA FOR A LOCALIZED SITE</b>Arnav Goel (17683527) 05 January 2024 (has links)
<p dir="ltr">Canopy height is a fundamental metric for extracting valuable information about forested areas. Over the past decade, Lidar technology has provided a straightforward approach to measuring canopy height using various platforms such as terrestrial, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), airborne, and satellite sensors. However, satellite Lidar data, even with its global coverage, has a sparse sampling pattern that doesn’t provide continuous coverage over the globe. In contrast, satellites like LANDSAT offer seamless and widespread coverage of the Earth's surface through spectral data. Can we exploit the abundant spectral information from satellites like LANDSAT and ECOSTRESS to infer structural information obtained from Lidar satellites like Global Ecosystem Dynamic Investigation (GEDI)? This study aims to develop a deep learning model that can infer canopy height derived from sparsely observed Lidar waveforms using multi-sensor spectral data from spaceborne platforms. Specifically designed for localized site, the model focuses on county-level canopy height estimation, taking advantage of the relationship between canopy height and spectral reflectance that can be established in a local setting – something which might not exist universally. The study hopes to achieve a framework that can be easily replicable as height is a dynamic metric which changes with time and thus requires repeated computation for different time periods.</p><p dir="ltr">The thesis presents a series of experiments designed to comprehensively understand the influence of different spectral datasets on the model’s performance and its effectiveness in different types of test sites. Experiment 1 and 2 utilize Landsat spectral band values to extrapolate canopy height, while Experiment 3 and 4 incorporate ECOSTRESS land surface temperature and emissivity band values in addition to Landsat data. Tippecanoe County, predominantly composed of cropland, serves as the test site for Experiment 1 and 3, while Monroe County, primarily covered by forests, serves as the test site for Experiment 2 and 4. When compared to the Airborne Lidar dataset from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) – 3D Elevation Program (3DEP), the model achieves a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 4.604m for Tippecanoe County using Landsat features while 5.479m for Monroe County. After integrating Landsat and ECOSTRESS features, the RMSE improves to 4.582m for Tippecanoe County but deteriorates to 5.860m for Monroe County. Overall, the study demonstrates comparable results to previous research without requiring feature engineering or extensive pre-processing. Furthermore, it successfully introduces a novel methodology for integrating multiple sources of satellite data to address this problem.</p>
|
Page generated in 0.0783 seconds