Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:55:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 461384.pdf: 621735 bytes, checksum: b8a7467d592d45d8f1c362fd57ba9624 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-08-12 / Dans ce travail, on montre la cause de l utilization d une m?thode pour Descartes, les pr?ceptes de cette m?thode et la relation de la m?me avec la v?rit?. Pour la recherche de la v?rit?, c est un instrument et un moyen indispensable, quand existent obscurit?s, complexit?s ? la resolution des probl?mes, il faut qu il intervienne. C est ? travers d elle qu on arrive aux ?vidences, id?es claires et distinctes. On a l ?vidence seulement ? travers de l intuition et de la deduction, c est sont les deux voies pour arriver ? la vraie science. Sont operations de l entendement claires et distinctes. Elles n a pas besoin de la m?thode parce qu elles sont ant?rieures ? lui, sont ? priori et sont justifi?es par si m?mes. Elles seulement interviennent ? la m?thode quand elles sont n?cessaires. On pr?sente les quatres pr?ceptes de la m?thode, mais pour Descartes, le pr?cept qui d?montre, qui montre comment on arrive ? la v?rit?, c est l analytique. La descendence m?thodologique de l auteur c est de l analyse des anciens g?om?tres et l alg?bre des modernes. C est que l auteur veut c est l ?vidence et la premi?re qu il a arriv?e, a ?t? le Cogito. Celui est obtenu par la m?thode. C est la premi?re v?rit? claire et distincte. A partir de ce l?, toutes les outres v?rit?s ?mergent du Cogito. Selon Descartes la connaissance va du subjectif au l objectif, Dieu, mais on d?fend que c est qui fondement le Cogito c est Dieu. On a fait un ?tude critique-comparatif entre le Discours de la M?thode et les M?ditations M?taphysiques pour montrer que les oeuvres ce diff?rencient selon l objectif de Descartes. / Neste trabalho, mostra-se o porqu? da utiliza??o de um m?todo por Descartes, os preceitos do mesmo e a rela??o do m?todo com a verdade. Para a procura da verdade ? um instrumento e meio imprescind?vel, quando existem obscuridades, complexidades na resolu??o de problemas, ? necess?rio que ele intervenha. ? atrav?s dele que se chega ?s evid?ncias, ideias claras e distintas. S? se tem evid?ncia atrav?s da intui??o e dedu??o, as duas vias para se chegar ? ci?ncia verdadeira. S?o opera??es do entendimento claras e distintas. Elas n?o precisam do m?todo porque s?o anteriores a ele, s?o ? priori, justificadas por si pr?prias. Elas interv?m no m?todo quando ? necess?rio. Apresenta-se os quatro preceitos do m?todo, mas o preceito que demonstra, que mostra como se chega ? verdade ? o anal?tico. A descend?ncia metodol?gica do autor ? da an?lise dos antigos ge?metras e da ?lgebra dos modernos. O que o autor quer ? evid?ncia, e a primeira a que chegou foi o Cogito. Este foi obtido pelo m?todo. ? a primeira verdade clara e distinta. A partir de ent?o todas as outras verdades emergem do Cogito. Segundo Descartes, o conhecimento vai do subjetivo ao objetivo, Deus, mas defende-se que quem fundamenta o Cogito ? Deus. Fez-se um estudo cr?ticocomparativo entre o Discurso do M?todo e as Medita??es Metaf?sicas, para mostrar que as obras se diferenciam segundo o objetivo de Descartes.

Lee Lai Peng Elizabeth. / "Architecture Department, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Master of Architecture Programme 1996-97, design report." / Includes bibliographical references. / Introduction / Chapter I --- point of departure --- p.1 / Chapter II --- project selection --- p.1 / clients and users / project analysis / Chapter III --- subject analysis / project Portrait --- p.1 / precedents --- p.2 / Chapter IV --- client / user analysis / functional Relationships --- p.1 / schedule of accommodation --- p.2 / Chapter V --- site / context analysis / location --- p.1 / context / access / transportation --- p.2 / future reclamation --- p.3 / restrictions --- p.4 / Chapter VI --- process / archipoint --- p.1 / identify the problem --- p.3 / conceptual --- p.9 / development --- p.15 / master plan --- p.17 / design development --- p.21 / summary --- p.23 / Chapter VII --- final project / major planning strategy --- p.1 / landscape strategy --- p.5 / site planning --- p.7 / volumetrics --- p.8 / functional relationship --- p.9 / circulation --- p.10 / shared use studies --- p.11 / detail studies --- p.13

At the beginning of the twentieth century, when young Chinese scholars looked to Western nations for answers in hope of revitalizing a nation that once dominated the East, musicians and poets embarked on a journey of establishing a new Chinese style of music. Three sets of composer/poet collaborations and three different ways of infusing Western culture with Chinese culture laid the foundation for Chinese choral music today. Chao Yuan-Ren was a brilliant linguist and music lover who thought that to simply implant Western music onto Chinese text would suffice–his HaiYun, set to a poem of the equally brilliant poet Xu Zhi-Mo serves as a good example. Huang Zi believed in Confucius’ teachings that all new things must grow out of tradition. He and the lyricist Wei Huang-Zhang extended a literary tradition started in the Tang dynasty and produced Song of Everlasting Sorrow, which illustrates this philosophy quite well. Yet, for the underprivileged people who also loved music, folk songs provided a fertile ground as seen in the works of Xian Xing-Hai. During the second Sino-Japanese War, the poet Guang Wei-Ran and Xian worked hand-in-hand, producing the Yellow River Cantata that contains folksong-like melodies and many folk-music elements. Chinese choral music today is unavoidably connected to these three pieces. This document traces the early history of Chinese choral music through these three pieces and explains their influences on Chinese choral music today.

<p>Towards the end of the 1960s, the credit financed purchase was well established in Sweden. The Swedish households were able to purchase goods, which had been considered unnecessary, or even luxurious, in the past. On the other hand, effective means to handle the increasing amount of debt and potential debtors were introduced; credit rating was registered, trade with insecure claims increased and if debtors could not fulfil their obligations, the creditors often used harsh or undue methods. </p><p>By introducing Inkassolagen (1974:182), the legislator hoped to regulate the debt recovery process and ensure the fair treatment of debtors. The legislator also introduced liability for damages caused by a creditor in the collection process. Thus the debtor may claim damages when he or she has been exposed to an undue collection method, which has violated the debtor’s integrity or personal life. Compensation comprises economic and/or non-pecuniary loss that the debtor has suffered. From the beginning, it was noted that the liability rule was vague and imprecise, but the legislator was convinced that the rule would be clarified by the courts and regulations decided by datainspektionen, the supervising authority. </p><p>Collection methods are methods used to force the debtor to fulfil his or her obligation. Normally, the creditor puts pressure on, or threats, the debtor. This procedure can be regarded as an exception to the state’s monopoly on use of force, and therefore it is not hard to see the necessity of the regulation. It should be noted that certain collection methods can be made subject to criminal prosecution, e.g. fraud, slander or libel. </p><p>From an economical point of view, a well-functioning collection process is vital to an effective capital market. The obligation to repay a loan must not be forgotten; if debtors where not obliged to fulfil theirobligations, no one would be interested in making capital available for finance. But does this mean that creditors should be able to use any means available in the collection process? </p><p>Based upon the prerequisites mentioned above, this thesis comprises a traditional legal and an economical analysis of the liability rule in inkassolagen. It has been the author’s intention to separate the two different views as far as possible.</p>

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2006. / The entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file. Title from title screen of research.pdf file viewed on (February 5, 2007) Includes bibliographical references.

Towards the end of the 1960s, the credit financed purchase was well established in Sweden. The Swedish households were able to purchase goods, which had been considered unnecessary, or even luxurious, in the past. On the other hand, effective means to handle the increasing amount of debt and potential debtors were introduced; credit rating was registered, trade with insecure claims increased and if debtors could not fulfil their obligations, the creditors often used harsh or undue methods. By introducing Inkassolagen (1974:182), the legislator hoped to regulate the debt recovery process and ensure the fair treatment of debtors. The legislator also introduced liability for damages caused by a creditor in the collection process. Thus the debtor may claim damages when he or she has been exposed to an undue collection method, which has violated the debtor’s integrity or personal life. Compensation comprises economic and/or non-pecuniary loss that the debtor has suffered. From the beginning, it was noted that the liability rule was vague and imprecise, but the legislator was convinced that the rule would be clarified by the courts and regulations decided by datainspektionen, the supervising authority. Collection methods are methods used to force the debtor to fulfil his or her obligation. Normally, the creditor puts pressure on, or threats, the debtor. This procedure can be regarded as an exception to the state’s monopoly on use of force, and therefore it is not hard to see the necessity of the regulation. It should be noted that certain collection methods can be made subject to criminal prosecution, e.g. fraud, slander or libel. From an economical point of view, a well-functioning collection process is vital to an effective capital market. The obligation to repay a loan must not be forgotten; if debtors where not obliged to fulfil theirobligations, no one would be interested in making capital available for finance. But does this mean that creditors should be able to use any means available in the collection process? Based upon the prerequisites mentioned above, this thesis comprises a traditional legal and an economical analysis of the liability rule in inkassolagen. It has been the author’s intention to separate the two different views as far as possible.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2002. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 500-517).

Diss. Uppsala : Sveriges lantbruksuniv., 2001.

Thesis (D. Min.)--Catholic Theological Union at Chicago, 2007. / Abstract and vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 167-174).

Thesis (D. Min.)--Catholic Theological Union at Chicago, 2007. / Abstract and vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 258-265).