Machine Translation (MT) for language pairs with long distance dependencies and word reordering, such as German-English, is prone to producing output that is lexically or syntactically incoherent. Statistical MT (SMT) models used explicit or latent syntax to improve reordering, however failed at capturing other long distance dependencies. This thesis explores how explicit sentence-level syntactic information can improve translation for such complex linguistic phenomena. In particular, we work at the level of the syntactic-semantic interface with representations conveying the predicate-argument structures. These are essential to preserving semantics in translation and SMT systems have long struggled to model them. String-to-tree SMT systems use explicit target syntax to handle long-distance reordering, but make strong independence assumptions which lead to inconsistent lexical choices. To address this, we propose a Selectional Preferences feature which models the semantic affinities between target predicates and their argument fillers using the target dependency relations available in the decoder. We found that our feature is not effective in a string-to-tree system for German-English and that often the conditioning context is wrong because of mistranslated verbs. To improve verb translation, we proposed a Neural Verb Lexicon Model (NVLM) incorporating sentence-level syntactic context from the source which carries relevant semantic information for verb disambiguation. When used as an extra feature for re-ranking the output of a German-English string-to-tree system, the NVLM improved verb translation precision by up to 2.7% and recall by up to 7.4%. While the NVLM improved some aspects of translation, other syntactic and lexical inconsistencies are not being addressed by a linear combination of independent models. In contrast to SMT, neural machine translation (NMT) avoids strong independence assumptions thus generating more fluent translations and capturing some long-distance dependencies. Still, incorporating additional linguistic information can improve translation quality. We proposed a method for tightly coupling target words and syntax in the NMT decoder. To represent syntax explicitly, we used CCG supertags, which encode subcategorization information, capturing long distance dependencies and attachments. Our method improved translation quality on several difficult linguistic constructs, including prepositional phrases which are the most frequent type of predicate arguments. These improvements over a strong baseline NMT system were consistent across two language pairs: 0.9 BLEU for German-English and 1.2 BLEU for Romanian-English.

A selectional preference is the relation between a head-word and plausible arguments of that head-word. Estimation of the association feature between these words is important to natural language processing applications such as Word Sense Disambiguation. This study presents a novel approach to selectional preference induction within a Random Indexing word space. This is a spatial representation of meaning where distributional patterns enable estimation of the similarity between words. Using only frequency statistics about words to estimate how strongly one word selects another, the aim of this study is to develop a flexible method that is not language dependent and does not require any annotated resourceswhich is in contrast to methods from previous research. In order to optimize the performance of the selectional preference model, experiments including parameter tuning and variation of corpus size were conducted. The selectional preference model was evaluated in a pseudo-word evaluation which lets the selectional preference model decide which of two arguments have a stronger correlation to a given verb. Results show that varying parameters and corpus size does not affect the performance of the selectional preference model in a notable way. The conclusion of the study is that the language modelused does not provide the adequate tools to model selectional preferences. This might be due to a noisy representation of head-words and their arguments.