The main aim of this study is to contribute to understanding of family influence on mate choice and satisfaction in long-term relationship. Studies suggest that family has significant influence on mate choice. According to the theory of sexual imprinting, individual create an image of the opposite sex parent during early childhood, which is in adulthood used as a template for partner choice (Bereczkei et al., 2002). However, in accordance with phenotype matching theory, the preference for similar traits like parents have, could be preferences for self-similarity, because they share with parents a half of genom. So it could means, that they prefer self-similar traits more than parent-similar traits (Rushton, 1989). Fourty nine couples participated in our research and also partner and parents of our respondents filled a set of standardized questionnaires. In the second study women evaluated male somatotypes and completed a questionnaire on the relationship with their father during childhood. The study showed many interesting results. Studyies aimed on sexual imprinting have focused only on the influence of the opposite sex parent (Wiszewska et al., 2007), however, we found that the parent of same sex influences partner choice of their offspring too. These findings support more the phenotypic matching...

Sexual imprinting, the process of learning mate preferences at a young age, could promote speciation by reducing attraction to individuals from divergent populations or species, consequently creating or maintaining reproductive isolation. Yet, despite the documentation of sexual imprinting in many taxa, its connection to speciation has been understudied. I chose to explore the potential link between sexual imprinting and reproductive isolation and in two North American rodents--the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) and its sister species, the cotton mouse (Peromyscus gossypinus). These species have overlapping distributions in nature, possibly allowing interbreeding and admixture. In Chapter 1, I used double-digest restriction-associated DNA sequencing to test for hybridization in sympatric natural populations and found that 1.5% of sampled individuals showed evidence of admixture yet the species have maintained genetic distinctness in sympatry. In the lab, the species hybridize when given no choice of mates but mate more readily with conspecifics, suggesting that mating preferences may prevent hybridization in the wild. In Chapter 2, I tested whether mating preferences create significant reproductive isolation. I measured mating preferences in controlled laboratory conditions and found that both species and sexes preferred conspecific to heterospecific mates in 85% of trials. I then raised offspring with foster parents of the opposite species and found that P. leucopus has a genetically-determined preference while P. gossypinus learns its preference. In Chapter 3, I tested whether sexual imprinting on parental diet could generate assortative mating within a species. I tested this hypothesis by feeding P. gossypinus parents either orange- or garlic-flavored water, thereby exposing their offspring to these flavors through their parents until weaning. I tested the preferences of these offspring as adults and found that P. gossypinus, especially females, had strong assortative mating preferences. This implies that at least females learn parental dietary information and that assortative mating could evolve within a single generation. Together, my results confirm that sexual imprinting on parental traits--possibly mediated through dietary differences--can create assortative mating capable of generating sexual isolation and reducing gene flow between species. My research supports the importance of mating preferences and learning in speciation.

In this thesis I investigate whether human sexual preferences develop through sexual imprinting. Sexual imprinting is the acquisition of sexual preferences through non-rewarded experiences with parents and siblings during an early sensitive period and it is known to exist in many other animals. Learning is often sex specific so that males, for instance, learn to prefer as sexual partners individuals that look like their mother, and avoid individuals that look like their father. First, sexual imprinting in animals and humans is reviewed and compared to prevailing evolutionary views presupposing genetically determined sexual preferences. Further, by means of web surveys, I have explored the relationship between childhood exposure to parents with certain natural and cultural traits and sexual attraction to these traits in a partner. Cultural traits were included because it is unlikely that preferences for them are genetically determined adaptations. Parental effects varied between traits. For instance, in heterosexual males, a positive effect of mother was found on attraction to smoking, but not glasses, while a negative paternal effect was found on attraction to glasses, but not smoking. However, when maternal and paternal effects were investigated for a large number of artificial and natural traits, including smoking and glasses, an overall positive effect of opposite sex parent emerged in both heterosexual males and females. Additionally, in the last study we explored a sexual preference for pregnant and lactating women. Results suggest that exposure to a pregnant and lactating mother had an effect if it occurred when the respondent was between 1,5 and 5 years old. In conclusion, these results suggest that human sexual preferences are the result of sex specific learning during a sensitive period. Sexual imprinting should therefore be recognised as a plausible explanation to human sexual preferences that deserves further scientific investigation. / At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 3: Manuscript. Paper 4: Manuscript.