Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 1977.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 1978.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 1977.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 1978.

No description available.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2003. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 67-74).

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is usually asymptomatic until later stage and the 5-year survival for stage III or IV are 68% and 10 % because of delayed diagnosis. Worldwide, it is the 4th leading cause of death among cancers which accounted for 694,000 deaths in 2012. While healthy diet and lifestyle helps prevent colorectal cancer, increased surveillance through screening has been suggested to attribute to the decreasing trend of colorectal cancer incidence in the United States in the past decade. Identifying what type of colorectal cancer screening methods is more effective is of public health relevance to Hong Kong where colorectal cancer ranks the top leading cancer. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematically review on current literatures to examine whether endoscopy screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy is more effective for reducing the mortality and incidence of colorectal cancer than no screening as many colorectal cancers arise from adenomatous polyps, which polypectomy is hypothesized to be protective. Meanwhile, different countries adopt different kinds of colorectal cancer screening modalities, but yet, there is no agreement for the types of screening. METHODS: Four databases, Medline (OVIDSP), Pubmed, CINAHL plus (EBSCOhost), Embase (OVIDSP) were used to search for published journals. Reference list of the identified articles were screened for more relevant studies. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies were included in this systematic review. There were only 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on screening for colorectal cancer using flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic and average-risk people and no RCT was found for colonoscopy. Based on the studies reviewed, findings were inconsistent on whether endoscopy screening is more effective in reducing overall colorectal cancer incidence and mortality than no screening. Endoscopy screening, either sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy was associated with lower incidence of distal colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy is not clearly associated with lower overall colorectal cancer risks based on current systematic review. Randomized controlled trials or retrospective cohorts are required to clarify the effectiveness of endoscopy screening before considering the implementation of population-wide colorectal cancer screening. / published_or_final_version / Public Health / Master / Master of Public Health

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karolinska institutet, 2007. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Diminutive polyps found on flexible sigmoidoscopy are predominantly hyperplastic, but it is impossible to rely on endoscopic appearance to make an accurate diagnosis. Colonoscopy, polypectomy, and full pathologic evaluation are recommended for all such polyps. Follow-up care varies depending on the nature of the lesion.

This thesis examines the benefits and costs of screening for colorectal cancer in the context of an organised population screening programme. It uses microsimulation modelling to derive an optimally cost-effective screening protocol for various combinations of the available screening tests. ¶ First a mathematical model for the natural history of colorectal cancer is derived, based on analyses of Australian population and hospital-based cancer registries combined with data from published studies. Then a model for population based screening is derived based mainly on data from published screening studies, including the four major published randomised controlled trials of faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening. These two models are used to simulate the application of a screening programme to the Australian population. The simulations are applied to a period of 40 years following 1990 (the study’s base year), with both costs and benefits discounted back to the base year at an annual rate of 3%.¶ The models are applied to simulating a population screening programme based on FOBT with a colonoscopy follow up of positive tests. This simulation suggests that the optimal application of such a programme would be to offer annual screening to people aged 50 to 84 years. Such a programme would lead to a cumulative fall in years of life lost to colorectal cancer (YLL) of 28.5% at a cost per year of life saved (YLS) of $8,987. These costs and benefits are consistent with those arising from other currently funded health interventions. They are also consistent with the cost per YLS which Australian governments appear willing to pay for health interventions when justified on the basis of cost-effectiveness. The fall in colorectal cancer deaths from this screening programme should be first detectable by a national monitoring system after around three years of screening. However the full benefits from screening would not be realised before around 30 years of screening.¶ These simulations are based on the standard guaiac FOBT, but the results suggest that significant cost-effective gains could be made by using the newer immunochemical FOBT. Further cost-effect gains could be made by offering sigmoidoscopy every five years in addition to annual FOBT.¶ The models are then applied to simulating population screening programmes using colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy as primary screening tools. Offering colonoscopy every ten years to all people aged from 45 to 85 leads to an overall fall in cumulative YLL of 37.6%, at a cost of $15,585 per YLS. Offering sigmoidoscopy every three years to all people aged 40 to 85 leads to an overall fall in cumulative YLL of 29.1%, at a cost of $4,862 per YLS. Both of these cost and benefit results are also consistent with the cost per YLS which Australian governments appear willing to pay. The fall in deaths with colonoscopy screening would also be detectable after three years of screening but the fall with sigmoidoscopy screening would not be detectable until after six years of screening. Sigmoidoscopy would need around 35 years of screening to reach its potential gains while colonoscopy screening would not reach its full potential during the 40 year screening period.¶ Finally the models are applied to targeting people at higher risk of cancer. The results show that offering colonoscopy every five years to people at higher risk because of a family history of colorectal cancer is a cost-effective addition to the annual FOBT screening programme.¶ An earlier version of chapter two of this thesis has been published as Stevenson CE 1995. Statistical models for cancer screening. Statistical Methods in Medical Research; 4: 19–23.¶ An expanded version of chapter two, along with parts of chapter one, has been published as Stevenson CE 1998. Models of screening. In: Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Armitage P, Colton T, eds. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, pp 3999–4022.