For the past two decades, events on the world stage and particularly in the United States have serious implications for the operations of financial markets. In this study, we will attempt to provide some insights into information dispersion before and after three particular events: the near collapse of Long Term Capital Management in August 1998, the Tech-Bubble Burst in March 2000, and the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001. A study of these events will yield insights into the resolution of information uncertainties in the financial markets. We estimated state prices and state price densities using Claims-based asset pricing (a la Ross (2000)). We then used our results to gauge investor sentiments three months before and three months after each event. We also used two new measures of the level of pessimism in the market during these events: skewness of the state price distributions and the percentages of discount states (with state price densities greater than one). Our results clearly indicate that different markets reacted differently to the three events, and that there were different levels of information leakage in the markets for each event. As expected, the impacts from the 9/11 event were immediate but short-lived in both the SPX and NDX markets. Further, our results show that event impact contamination played an important role in the over- and under-reactions to the three events. More specifically, our results indicate that the LTCM event was closely related to and was probably precipitated by the Russian Currency Crisis. As well, the 9/11 event occurred immediately following predictions of a U.S. economic recession, and three months prior to the declaration of the War on Terror. Our results show lulls and peaks in market expectations which correspond to these separate and yet correlated events. / Thesis (Ph.D, Management) -- Queen's University, 2008-05-30 13:29:49.85

<p>This dissertation develops new econometric techniques for use in estimating and conducting inference on parameters that can be identified from option prices. The techniques in question extend the existing literature in financial econometrics along several directions.</p><p>The first essay considers the problem of estimating and conducting inference on the term structures of a class of economically interesting option portfolios. The option portfolios of interest play the role of functionals on an infinite-dimensional parameter (the option surface indexed by the term structure of state-price densities) that is well-known to be identified from option prices. Admissible functionals in the essay are generalizations of the VIX volatility index, which represent weighted integrals of options prices at a fixed maturity. By forming portfolios for various maturities, one can study their term structure. However, an important econometric difficulty that must be addressed is the illiquidity of options at longer maturities, which the essay overcomes by proposing a new nonparametric framework that takes advantage of asset pricing restrictions to estimate a shape-conforming option surface. In a second stage, the option portfolios of interest are cast as functionals of the estimated option surface, which then gives rise to a new, asymptotic distribution theory for option portfolios. The distribution theory is used to quantify the estimation error induced by computing integrated option portfolios from a sample of noisy option data. Moreover, by relying on the method of sieves, the framework is nonparametric, adheres to economic shape restrictions for arbitrary maturities, yields closed-form option prices, and is easy to compute. The framework also permits the extraction of the entire term structure of risk-neutral distributions in closed-form. Monte Carlo simulations confirm the framework's performance in finite samples. An application to the term structure of the synthetic variance swap portfolio finds sizeable uncertainty around the swap's true fair value, particularly when the variance swap is synthesized from noisy long-maturity options. A nonparametric investigation into the term structure of the variance risk premium finds growing compensation for variance risk at long maturities.</p><p>The second essay, which represents joint work with Jia Li, proposes an econometric framework for inference on parametric option pricing models with two novel features. First, point identification is not assumed. The lack of identification arises naturally when a researcher only has interval observations on option quotes rather than on the efficient option price itself, which implies that the parameters of interest are only partially identified by observed option prices. This issue is solved by adopting a moment inequality approach. Second, the essay imposes no-arbitrage restrictions between the risk-neutral and the physical measures by nonparametrically estimating quantities that are invariant to changes of measures using high-frequency returns data. Theoretical justification for this framework is provided and is based on an asymptotic setting in which the sampling interval of high frequency returns goes to zero as the sampling span goes to infinity. Empirically, the essay shows that inference on risk-neutral parameters becomes much more conservative once the assumption of identification is relaxed. At the same time, however, the conservative inference approach yields new and interesting insights into how option model parameters are related. Finally, the essay shows how the informativeness of the inference can be restored with the use of high frequency observations on the underlying.</p><p>The third essay applies the sieve estimation framework developed in this dissertation to estimate a weekly time series of the risk-neutral return distribution's quantiles. Analogous quantiles for the objective-measure distribution are estimated using available methods in the literature for forecasting conditional quantiles from historical data. The essay documents the time-series properties for a range of return quantiles under each measure and further compares the difference between matching return quantiles. This difference is shown to correspond to a risk premium on binary options that pay off when the underlying asset moves below a given quantile. A brief empirical study shows asymmetric compensation for these return risk premia across different quantiles of the conditional return distribution.</p> / Dissertation

In this dissertation, I focus on the development and application of nonparametric methods in econometrics. First, a constrained nonparametric regression method is developed to estimate a function and its derivatives subject to shape restrictions implied by economic theory. The constrained estimators can be viewed as a set of empirical likelihood-based reweighted local polynomial estimators. They are shown to be weakly consistent and have the same first order asymptotic distribution as the unconstrained estimators. When the shape restrictions are correctly specified, the constrained estimators can achieve a large degree of finite sample bias reduction and thus outperform the unconstrained estimators. The constrained nonparametric regression method is applied on the estimation of daily option pricing function and state-price density function. Second, a modified Cumulative Sum of Squares (CUSQ) test is proposed to test structural changes in the unconditional volatility in a time-varying coefficient model. The proposed test is based on nonparametric residuals from local linear estimation of the time-varying coefficients. Asymptotic theory is provided to show that the new CUSQ test has standard null distribution and diverges at standard rate under the alternatives. Compared with a test based on least squares residuals, the new test enjoys correct size and good power properties. This is because, by estimating the model nonparametrically, one can circumvent the size distortion from potential structural changes in the mean. Empirical results from both simulation experiments and real data applications are presented to demonstrate the test's size and power properties. Third, an empirical study of testing the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) hypothesis is conducted in a functional-coefficient cointegration model, which is consistent with equilibrium models of exchange rate determination with the presence of trans- actions costs in international trade. Supporting evidence of PPP is found in the recent float exchange rate era. The cointegration relation of nominal exchange rate and price levels varies conditioning on the real exchange rate volatility. The cointegration coefficients are more stable and numerically near the value implied by PPP theory when the real exchange rate volatility is relatively lower.