Les gisements uranifères nigériens sont localisés dans les formations carbonifères et jurassiques du bassin de Tim Mersoï. AREVA est actionnaire de 3 sites miniers de cette région: la SOMAÏR et la COMINAK dans le district d'Arlit, en exploitation depuis 50ans, et IMOURAREN, 80km plus au Sud, dont l'exploitation est programmée pour 2015. La minéralisation du gisement d'Imouraren est comprise dans la formation fluviatile du Tchirézrine 2 (Jurassique), formée de chenaux et de plaines d'inondation. Les faciès de remplissage de chenaux vont des grès grossiers aux grès très fins (cortège détritique : quartz et feldspaths), tandis que les faciès de débordement sont constitués d'analcimolites. La minéralogie secondaire est acquise lors de 2 évènements : 1- la diagenèse, avec formation de minéraux argileux, d'analcime, de quartz et d'albite secondaires, et 2- un épisode de circulations de fluides, qui induit une altération des minéraux détritiques et diagénétiques, la formation de nouvelles phases et le dépôt de l'uranium. Cette altération dessine une zonation minéralogique à l'échelle du gisement.L'hétérogénéité du Tchirézrine 2, tant au niveau des faciès que de la minéralogie, se perçoit lors du traitement du minerai, puisqu'il réagit différemment selon sa provenance, avec parfois des problèmes de récupération de l'U. Des essais de traitement de minerais, ont montré que analcimes et chlorites étaient les deux pénalisants, pour 3 raisons : 1- les piégeages des phases U au sein des analcimes, 2- la dissolution de ces 2 minéraux a tendance à faire sortir des conditions de solubilisation de l'U (pH et Eh) et à former de nombreux sulfates, 3- problèmes de percolation. Une méthode de détection des minerais riches en analcimes, basée sur la spectroscopie infrarouge, a été développée afin d'optimiser les mélanges de minerais et ainsi de réduire les effets néfastes des pénalisants lors du traitement. / Nigerian uraniferous deposits are located in carboniferous and jurassic formations of Tim Mersoï basin. AREVA is shareholder of 3 mine sites in this area: SOMAÏR and COMINAK, both in exploitation since 1960’s and IMOURAREN, 80km further South, whose exploitation is planned for 2015. Mineralization of Imouraren deposit is included in the fluvial formation of Tchirezrine 2 (Jurassic), composed of channels and flood plains. Facies of channel infillings range from coarse sandstones to siltstones, while overflow facies are composed of analcimolites.Secondary mineralogy was acquired during 2 stages: 1- diagenesis, with formation of clay minerals, analcime, secondary quartz and albites, and 2- stage of fluids circulations, which induced alteration of detrital and diagenetic minerals, formation of new phases and uranium deposition. A mineralogical zoning, at the scale of deposit resulted from this alteration. The heterogeneity of Tchirezrine 2, at the level of both facies and mineralogy, is also evidenced during ore treatment, as ore reacts differently depending on its source, with sometimes problems of U recovery. Ore treatment tests showed that analcimes and chlorites were both penalizing minerals, because of 1- the sequestration of U-bearing minerals into analcimes, 2- their dissolution which trends to move away from U solubilization conditions (pH and Eh) and to form numerous sulfates, and 3- problems of percolation. A detection method of analcime-rich ores, based on infrared spectroscopy, was developed in order to optimize ore blending and so to reduce negative effects during ore treatment process.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Numerous studies have investigated the fate of pollutants in riparian buffers, but few studies have focused on the control of multiple contaminants simultaneously in riparian zones. To better understand what drives the biogeochemical cycles of multiple contaminants in riparian zones, a 19-month study was conducted in riparian buffers across a range of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) settings in the White River watershed in Indiana. Three research sites [Leary Webber Ditch (LWD), Scott Starling (SS) and White River (WR)] with contrasting hydro-geomorphology were selected. We monitored groundwater table depth, oxidation reduction potential (ORP), dissolved oxygen (DO), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), NO3-, NH4+, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), SO42- , total Hg and methylmercury (MeHg). Our results revealed that differences in HGM conditions translated into distinctive site hydrology, but significant differences in site hydrology did not lead to different biogeochemical conditions. Nitrate reduction and sulfate re-oxidation were likely associated with major hydrological events, while sulfate reduction, ammonia and methylmercury production were likely associated with seasonal changes in biogeochemical conditions. Results also suggest that the LWD site was a small sink for nitrate but a source for sulfate and MeHg, the SS site was a small sink for MeHg but had little effect on NO3-, SO42- and SRP, and the WR was an intermediate to a large sink for nitrate, an intermediate sink for SRP, and a small source for MeHg. Land use and point source appears to have played an important role in regulating solute concentrations (NO3-, SRP and THg). Thermodynamic theories probably oversimplify the complex patterns of solute dynamics which, at the sites monitored in the present study, were more strongly impacted by HGM settings, land use, and proximity to a point source.