• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1504
  • 511
  • 422
  • 336
  • 134
  • 117
  • 80
  • 57
  • 46
  • 45
  • 36
  • 16
  • 15
  • 15
  • 10
  • Tagged with
  • 4094
  • 466
  • 400
  • 383
  • 357
  • 318
  • 305
  • 292
  • 254
  • 223
  • 218
  • 216
  • 189
  • 187
  • 171
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.

EAC Guidelines for the use of Geophysics in Archaeology: Questions to Ask and Points to Consider.

Schmidt, Armin R., Linford, P., Linford, N., David, A., Gaffney, Christopher F., Sarris, A., Fassbinder, J. January 2015 (has links)
These guidelines provide an overview of the issues to be considered when undertaking or commissioning geophysical survey in archaeology. As every project diff ers in its requirements (e.g. from fi nding sites to creating detailed maps of individual structures) and variations in geological and environmental conditions lead to diff erent geophysical responses, there is no single ‘best’ survey technique or methodology. Th is guide, in its European approach, highlights the various questions to be asked before a survey is undertaken. It does not provide recipebook advice on how to do a geophysical survey or a tick list of which technique is suitable under what conditions. Experienced archaeological geophysicists should be consulted to address the questions that are being posed. Using geophysical techniques and methods inappropriately will lead to disappointment and may, ultimately, result in archaeologists not using them at all. “If all you have is a hammer (or magnetometer), driving a screw becomes impossible”. Especially in the American literature the term ‘remote sensing’ is oft en used to describe geophysical as well as air and space based exploration of underground features (e.g. Wiseman and El-Baz 2007). By contrast, and in line with European traditions, a clear distinction is made here between ground-based geophysical techniques and remote sensing techniques. Th is is based on the imaging principles underlying the respective technologies. Ground based systems usually collect one spatially registered data sample from each sensor location (e.g. a single reading for each magnetometer, or a single trace from each GPR antenna). Remote sensing techniques, by contrast, collect spatially resolved data from a whole area of investigation from each sensor location, using either the system’s optical aperture (e.g. photography) or a scanning device (e.g. laser sampling). These guidelines are based on the experience of the authors in archaeological geophysics and infl uenced by various published sources.

Development of ATAAS, FI-ATAAS and HPLC-FAAS for the determination of heavy metals in the environment

Ellis, Lyndon Anthony January 1997 (has links)
No description available.

Interpretation of regional gravity and aeromagnetic surveys of the Antarctic Peninsula

Garrett, S. W. January 1986 (has links)
No description available.

Sedimentology and stratigraphy of part of the Mesozoic Fossil Bluff Group, Alexander Island, Antarctica

Butterworth, P. J. January 1988 (has links)
No description available.

The development of a questionnaire to measure psychosocial vulnerability to depression

Moran, Patricia January 1999 (has links)
No description available.

A study of the policy implications arising from a local survey of perinatal mortality

Robinson, J. J. A. January 1986 (has links)
No description available.

An object oriented and visual data analysis environment : semantics and pragmatics of multi language programming

Jenkins, Stephen Graham January 2003 (has links)
No description available.

The construction of an inventory of school anxiety for high school students in Iraq

Raoof, T. M. R. January 1981 (has links)
No description available.

The magnetic and structural properties of pure and doped Rb(sub)2CrCl(sub)4

Fyne, P. J. January 1984 (has links)
No description available.

Eco-physiological studies on Eriophorum vaginatum L. in a moorland habitat

Robertson, Kenneth Paul January 1981 (has links)
No description available.

Page generated in 0.4565 seconds