Doctor of Philosophy / Curriculum and Instruction Programs / F. Todd Goodson / The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent teacher candidates perceive value in the process of constructing an electronic academic portfolio. This study will also attempt to answer what process teacher candidates used in developing their electronic academic portfolios and what value teacher candidates assign to each of the steps in the process as well as how the teacher candidate intends to use the academic portfolio during the final semester prior to the professional semester. A qualitative multi-case study was used to conduct the research. Data collected included a pre and post survey as well as three one-on-one interviews with eleven teacher candidates. Teacher candidates were also asked to keep an electronic journal to answer the following questions. 1. Describe the process you used to create your electronic academic portfolio. 2. Describe your personal frustrations with creating your electronic academic portfolio. 3. Describe your personal triumphs with creating your electronic academic portfolio. The analysis of the data took place throughout the final semester prior to the professional semester, during which time teacher candidates are taking his or her last five restricted methods courses. The researcher recruited one additional reader in the field of education. The reader was trained prior to the actual coding day by the researcher to identify themes from the pilot study. • Theme A: Pride • Theme B: Organization • Theme C: Technology Skills • Theme D: Value • Other The commonalities were coded by the reader and the researcher. The goal of this was to examine teacher candidate perceptions in creating and electronic academic portfolio. Teacher preparation programs must determine if the process of creating an electronic academic portfolio has positive effectiveness.

Professional development is ubiquitous in education, with over 90% of teachers engaging in professional development activities, yet often with limited perceived impact on their practice. This dissertation situates itself at the critical juncture of professional development quality and teacher self-efficacy, investigating the transformative influence of the Academy of Blended Learning professional development program on educators’ self-efficacy and pedagogical practices. Despite widespread participation in professional development nationally, the prevalent sentiment among teachers points to a disconnect, with many sessions deemed ineffectual (Wei et al., 2009). Conversely, professional development perceived as high-quality correlates with improved teacher skills and classroom practices (Desimone et al., 2002; Garet et al., 2001a), underscoring the need for meaningful PD delivery. Blended learning represents a significant advancement in the evolving education landscape, blending traditional and digital instruction methods. This dissertation examines the impact of the Academy of Blended Learning experiential professional development program on teacher self-efficacy. Through qualitative analysis and evaluation, this study employs a framework by Smith and Robinson (2020) that intertwines Bandura’s Self-Efficacy Theory (1977), Bruner’s Constructivist Theory (1960), and Knowles’ Adult Learning Theory (andragogy) (1978), offering a comprehensive lens to examine the efficacy of professional development for educators. These theoretical underpinnings serve as the foundation for understanding how professional development influences teachers as adult learners, ultimately affecting their self-efficacy. Participants in the Academy of Blended Learning professional development program reported substantial gains in skills and a marked increase in self-efficacy, attributing these advancements to the comprehensive and experiential nature of the program. It goes beyond mere tool provision; it reshapes educators’ self-concepts, fueling their enthusiasm and intentionality in teaching. This transformative experience has empowered teachers and enhanced their ability to meet their students’ diverse needs, leading to a positive shift in their professional practice and trajectory. The study underscores the necessity of placing teacher self-efficacy at the forefront of professional development initiatives, particularly within blended learning. The findings advocate for educational leaders to recognize and support quality professional development that cultivates the attitudes and competencies necessary for teachers to thrive. The compelling evidence of professional growth and increased self-efficacy among participants signals the essential role of tailored professional development programs like the Academy of Blended Learning in shaping the future of education.

Analysis is typically the first of the higher functions listed in taxonomies of higher order thinking. Academics consider these upper categories extremely worthwhile, but they are hard to teach and we are apt to ignore them. Today higher education is being criticized for “dumbing down” curriculum or lowering standards. To rectify this, many policies at the state or national level are requiring higher education institutions to change. In K‐12 education, Race to the Top and Common Core requirements are placing new demands on K‐12 teacher preparation, which include evaluation of the analysis skills of pre‐service teachers. But professors do not always view their disciplines as the proper place for teaching analytical skills. Others become frustrated when trying to teach analysis. But if we do not teach these skills, our teacher candidates will be poorly prepared for successful teaching, a problem which will cascade throughout our society, rendering our citizens less educated. In this paper, we describe our efforts to teach analysis in two courses from widely differing subject areas, literacy and mathematics education. We are now requiring pre‐service teachers to analyze simulated or actual samples of student work. We have developed a sequenced process of analysis education that we designate with the acronym CODE. It includes Compilation of information, Organization of data, Determination of patterns, and Explanation of understanding. We believe this technique can be generalized to many courses in where students’ ability to analyze poses a problem.