Spelling suggestions: "subject:"then imperfect indicative"" "subject:"them imperfect indicative""
1 |
¿El pretérito perfecto simple o el pretérito imperfecto? : Un estudio de los factores que influirían en el uso del PPS y del PI de estudiantes universitarios en SueciaMagnusson, Emma January 2012 (has links)
The aim of this essay is to identify the factors that exert an influence on university students' use of the imperfect indicative and the preterite in Spanish. The present study is based on an empirical study consisting of questionnaries carried out with 102 university students who study Spanish as a foreign language at four different universities in Sweden. The hypothesis of this essay is that not only internal factors and external factors but also individual factors and learner strategies used by the students have an influence on the students' correct and incorrect use of the imperfect indicative and the preterite. In the theoretical background of this essay, the internal, external and individual factors related to the acquisition of Spanish as a foreign language are presented. In the next part of the essay, the results of the empirical study are presented and analized. In order to determine if there are any correlations between the variables in question, a series of statistical tests are carried out and analized. Taking in consideration the factors of the aim of this study, the independent variables, i.e. the internal, external and individual factors, are confronted with the dependent variable, i.e. the amount of correct and incorrect answers, in order to identify which of these independent variables favour and prevent the correct use of the imperfect indicative and the preterite. The statistical analyses carried out verify the initial hypothesis: internal and external factors as well as individual factors exert an influence on the students' correct and incorrect use of the imperfect indicative and the preterite.
|
2 |
Imperfect use of indicative and imperfectives periphrases last in literary memories produced by students in Brazilian public schools / Uso do imperfeito do indicativo e de perÃfrases imperfectivas de passado em memÃrias literÃrias produzidas por alunos de escolas pÃblicas brasileirasMicheline Guelry Silva Albuquerque 25 February 2015 (has links)
nÃo hà / This research aims to analyze variation in the use of the imperfect of indicative and imperfective periphrases the past, literary memories produced in 2010 and 2012, by students of the 7th and 8th years, finalists of the Portuguese Language Olympiad Writing the Future. Accordingly, it intends to investigate factors (linguistic and extra-linguistic) motivate the choice of one form or another. Therefore, is based on the Sociofuncionalism the postulates defended by Tavares (2003), resulting theoretical wedding between Sociolinguistics variational (Weinreich, Labov And HERZOG, 1968; Labov, 1972, 1978, 1994, 2001, 2003, 2010) and the US shed functionalism (cf. Givon, 1995, 2001; HOPPER, 1991; HOPPER & TRAUGOTT, 1993; TRAUGOTT, 1995. the corpus consists of 2205 data imperfective forms of past collected from 76 of literary texts memories , and in 1926 these data imperfect indicative past tense, for a total of 87.3% of the total, and 279 forms of imperfective periphrases past, totaling a percentage of 12.7% of the total incidence. The outcomes of the rounds statistics done using the software GoldVarb revealed that the phenomenon under study is motivated by linguistic factors, as imperfective function (episodic, habitual, iterative and progressive), semantic-discursive kind of verb (process culminated, culmination, activity and state), type prayer (coordinated asyndetic, subordinate adverbial, adjectival subordinate, coordinated syndetic, principal, absolute and conditional substantive), aspectual modifier (quantifier, durative, punctual and without modifier) and polarity (positive and negative), having been discarded by the statistics rounds factors narrative of the plan: figure and ground and geographic regions for failing to submit the relevant motivation of the imperfective forms under review. Thus, the results obtained and analyzed showed us how prototypical contexts for each form under the following analysis: the imperfect codes, prototypically, episodic role, culminating with process verb in affirmative prayer coordinated asyndetic with quantifier modifier; the periphrasis, in turn, presents, prototypically, progressive encoding function, with state verbs in negative substantive subordinate clauses, in the presence of aspectual point modifier. / Esta pesquisa tem por objetivo analisar variaÃÃo no uso do imperfeito do indicativo e de perÃfrases imperfectivas de passado, em memÃrias literÃrias produzidas em 2010 e 2012, por alunos do 7o e do 8o anos, finalistas da OlimpÃada de LÃngua Portuguesa Escrevendo o Futuro. Nesse sentido, intenta-se investigar fatores (linguÃsticos e extralinguÃstico) motivam a escolha por uma ou outra forma. Para tanto, fundamenta-se nos postulados do Sociofuncionalismo, defendidos por Tavares (2003), resultante do casamento teÃrico entre a SociolinguÃstica Variacionista, (WEINREICH, LABOV E HERZOG, 1968; LABOV, 1972, 1978, 1994, 2001, 2003, 2010), e o Funcionalismo de vertente norte-americana (cf. GIVÃN, 1995, 2001; HOPPER, 1991; HOPPER &TRAUGOTT, 1993; TRAUGOTT, 1995). O corpus à formado por 2205 dados de formas imperfectivas de passado coletados de 76 textos de memÃrias literÃrias, sendo 1926 destes dados de pretÃrito imperfeito do indicativo, perfazendo um total de 87,3% do total, e 279 formas de perÃfrases imperfectivas de passado, que totalizam um percentual de 12,7% do total de ocorrÃncias. Os resultados decorrentes das rodadas estatÃsticas realizadas pelo programa computacional GoldVarb revelaram que o fenÃmeno em estudo à motivado por fatores linguÃsticos, como funÃÃo imperfectivas (episÃdica, habitual, iterativa e progressiva), tipo semÃntico-discursivo do verbo (processo culminado, culminaÃÃo, atividade e estado), tipo de oraÃÃo (coordenada assindÃtica, subordinada adverbial, subordinada adjetiva, coordenada sindÃtica, principal, absoluta e subordinada substantiva), modificador aspectual (quantificador, durativo, pontual e sem modificador) e polaridade (positiva e negativa), tendo sido descartados pelas rodadas estatÃsticas os fatores plano da narrativa: figura e fundo e regiÃes geogrÃficas por nÃo terem apresentado relevÃncia na motivaÃÃo por uma das formas imperfectivas sob anÃlise. Dessa forma, os resultados obtidos e analisados revelaram-nos como contextos prototÃpicos para cada forma sob anÃlise os seguintes: o imperfeito codifica, prototipicamente, funÃÃo episÃdica, com verbo de processo culminado, em oraÃÃo coordenada assindÃtica afirmativa, com modificador quantificador; a perÃfrase, por sua vez, apresenta-se, prototipicamente, codificando funÃÃo progressiva, com verbos de estado, em oraÃÃes subordinadas substantivas negativas, na presenÃa de modificador aspectual pontual.
|
Page generated in 0.1032 seconds