Thesis--Gothenburg. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 218-234).

Thesis (M. Phil.)--University of Hong Kong, 1994. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 100-101).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1952. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1975. / Typescript and manuscript. Vita. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaf [64]).

Thèse--Geneva. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [211]-215) and index.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1968. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of California, 1964. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 179-182).

Diss.--Erlangen.

"Second-order logic" is the name given to a formal system. Some claim that the formal system is a logical system. Others claim that it is a mathematical system. In the thesis, I examine these claims in the light of some philosophical criteria which first motivated Frege in his logicist project. The criteria are that a logic should be universal, it should reflect our intuitive notion of logical validity, and it should be analytic. The analysis is interesting in two respects. One is conceptual: it gives us a purchase on where and how to draw a distinction between logic and other sciences. The other interest is historical: showing that second-order logic is a logical system according to the philosophical criteria mentioned above goes some way towards vindicating Frege's logicist project in a contemporary context.

M.Ed. / Recently there has been renewed interest in proof and proving in schools worldwide. However, many school students and even teachers of mathematics have only superficial ideas on the nature of proof. Proof is considered the heart of mathematics as individuals explore, make conjectures and try to convince themselves and others about the truth or falsity of their conjectures. There are basically two categories of deductive proof, namely proof by direct argument and indirect proofs. The aim of this study was to examine the structural features common to most of the mathematical proofs for formalised mathematical systems, with the emphasis on indirect proof techniques. The main question was to investigate which mathematical activities and logical principles at secondary school level are necessary for students to become proficient with proof writing. A great deal of specialised language is associated with reasoning. Such words as axiom, theorem, proof, and conjecture are just some of the terms that students must understand as they engage in the proof-making task. The formal aspect of mathematics at secondary school is extremely important. It is inevitable that students become involved with hypothetical arguments. They use among others, proofs by contradiction. Furthermore, necessary and sufficient conditions are related to theorems and their converses. It is therefore apparent that the study of logic is necessary already at secondary school level in order to practise mathematics satisfactorily. An analysis of the mathematics syllabus of the Department of Education has indicated that students should use indirect techniques of proof. According to this syllabus students should be familiar with logical arguments. The conclusion which is reached, gives evidence that students’ background in logic is completely lacking and inadequate. As a result they cannot cope adequately with argumentation and this causes a poor perception of what mathematics entails. Although proof writing can never be reduced to a mechanical process, considerable anxiety and uncertainty can be eliminated from the process if students are exposed to the principles of elementary logic and techniques. Mathematics educators and education researchers have reported students’ difficulties with mathematical proof and point out the conflict between the nature of this essential mathematical activity and current approaches to teaching it. This recent interest has led to an increased effort to teach proof in innovative ways.