The steam generator plays a primary role in the safety and performance of a pressurized water reactor nuclear power plant. The cost to utilities is in the order of millions of Rands a year as a direct result of damage to steam generators. The damage results in lower efficiency or even plant shutdown. It is necessary for the utility and for academia to have models of nuclear components by which research and analysis may be performed. It must be possible to analyse steam generator performance for both day-to-day operational analysis as well as in the case of extreme accident scenarios. The homogeneous model for two-phase flow is simpler in its implementation than the two-fluid model, and therefore suffers in accuracy. Its advantage lies in its quick turnover time for development of models and subsequent analysis. It is often beneficial for a modeller to be able to quickly set up and analyse a model of a system, and a trade-off between accuracy and time-management is thus required. Searches through available literature failed to provide answers to how the homogeneous model compares with the two-fluid model for operational and safety analysis. It is expected to see variations between the models, from the analysis of the mathematics, but it remains to be shown what these differences are. The purpose of this study was to determine how the homogeneous model for two-phase flow compares with the two-fluid model when applied to a u-tube steam generator of a typical pressurized water reactor. The steam generator was modelled in both RELAP5 and in Flownex. A custom script was written for Flownex in order to implement the Chen correlation for boiling heat transfer. This was significantly less detailed than RELAP5’s solution of a matrix of flow regimes and heat transfer correlations. The geometry of the models were based on technical drawings from Koeberg Nuclear Power Plant, and were simplified to a one-dimensional model. Plant data obtained from Koeberg was used to validate the models at 100%, 80% and 60% power output. It was found that the overall heat transfer rate predicted with the RELAP5 two-fluid model was within 1.5% of the measured data from the Koeberg plant. The results generated by the homogeneous model for the overall heat transfer were within 4.5% of the measured values. However, the differences in the detailed temperature distributions and heat transfer coefficient values were quite significant at the inlet and outlet ends of the tube bundle, at the bottom tube sheet of the steam generator. In this area the water-level was not accurately modelled by the homogeneous model, and therefore there was an under-prediction in heat transfer in that region. Large differences arose between the Flownex and RELAP5 solutions due to difference in the heat transfer correlations used. The Flownex model exclusively implemented the Chen correlation, while RELAP5 implements a flow regime map correlated to a table of heat transfer correlations. It was concluded that the results from the homogeneous model for two-phase flow do not differ significantly when compared with the two-fluid model when applied to the u-tube steam generator at the normal operating conditions. Significant differences do, however, occur in lower regions of the boiler where the quality is lower. We conclude that the homogeneous model offers significant advantage in simplicity over the two-fluid model for normal operational analysis. This may not be the case for detailed accident analysis, which was beyond the scope of this study. / Thesis (MIng (Nuclear Engineering))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013.

The steam generator plays a primary role in the safety and performance of a pressurized water reactor nuclear power plant. The cost to utilities is in the order of millions of Rands a year as a direct result of damage to steam generators. The damage results in lower efficiency or even plant shutdown. It is necessary for the utility and for academia to have models of nuclear components by which research and analysis may be performed. It must be possible to analyse steam generator performance for both day-to-day operational analysis as well as in the case of extreme accident scenarios. The homogeneous model for two-phase flow is simpler in its implementation than the two-fluid model, and therefore suffers in accuracy. Its advantage lies in its quick turnover time for development of models and subsequent analysis. It is often beneficial for a modeller to be able to quickly set up and analyse a model of a system, and a trade-off between accuracy and time-management is thus required. Searches through available literature failed to provide answers to how the homogeneous model compares with the two-fluid model for operational and safety analysis. It is expected to see variations between the models, from the analysis of the mathematics, but it remains to be shown what these differences are. The purpose of this study was to determine how the homogeneous model for two-phase flow compares with the two-fluid model when applied to a u-tube steam generator of a typical pressurized water reactor. The steam generator was modelled in both RELAP5 and in Flownex. A custom script was written for Flownex in order to implement the Chen correlation for boiling heat transfer. This was significantly less detailed than RELAP5’s solution of a matrix of flow regimes and heat transfer correlations. The geometry of the models were based on technical drawings from Koeberg Nuclear Power Plant, and were simplified to a one-dimensional model. Plant data obtained from Koeberg was used to validate the models at 100%, 80% and 60% power output. It was found that the overall heat transfer rate predicted with the RELAP5 two-fluid model was within 1.5% of the measured data from the Koeberg plant. The results generated by the homogeneous model for the overall heat transfer were within 4.5% of the measured values. However, the differences in the detailed temperature distributions and heat transfer coefficient values were quite significant at the inlet and outlet ends of the tube bundle, at the bottom tube sheet of the steam generator. In this area the water-level was not accurately modelled by the homogeneous model, and therefore there was an under-prediction in heat transfer in that region. Large differences arose between the Flownex and RELAP5 solutions due to difference in the heat transfer correlations used. The Flownex model exclusively implemented the Chen correlation, while RELAP5 implements a flow regime map correlated to a table of heat transfer correlations. It was concluded that the results from the homogeneous model for two-phase flow do not differ significantly when compared with the two-fluid model when applied to the u-tube steam generator at the normal operating conditions. Significant differences do, however, occur in lower regions of the boiler where the quality is lower. We conclude that the homogeneous model offers significant advantage in simplicity over the two-fluid model for normal operational analysis. This may not be the case for detailed accident analysis, which was beyond the scope of this study. / Thesis (MIng (Nuclear Engineering))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013.