The fossil record is the primary source of information on the history of life. As such, it is important to understand the limitations of this record. One critical area in which there is still much work to be done is in understanding how the fossil record, and our interpretation of it, may be biased. Herein, the fidelity between the life and death assemblage of an extant brachiopod with respect to morphological variability is studied using geometric morphometrics. The results from several analyses confirm a high degree of morphological variability with little change in mean shape between the living and sub-fossil assemblage. Additionally, there is no evidence of distinct morphogroups in either assemblage. These trends persist at all depths and size classes indicating that this species could be recognized as a single, rather than multiple, species if only fossil data were available. The second chapter involves the recognition and quantification of a worker bias in monographs of brachiopods and bivalves. Most specimens studied came from the 65th to 69th percentile of their species' bulk-collected size-frequency distribution. This indicates a significant bias toward monograph specimens that are larger than the mean size of the bulk sample. When compared at the species level, this bias was found to be highly consistent among the 86 species included in the study. Thus, size measurements of monographed specimens reliably and consistently record a similar size class for any given species, and this bias is easily corrected during meta-analyses. Chapter three focuses on bivalves and brachiopods from a modern tropical shelf and quantifies the magnitude of time averaging (temporal mixing) for these two different organisms. This is accomplished by dating a suite of shells from each site using amino acid racemization calibrated with several radiocarbon dates. By studying the age distributions for each species it is determined that, despite some site to site differences, both bivalve and brachiopod species exhibit a similar time averaging magnitude when collected from the same region or depositional system. This indicates that fossil assemblages of these species may have very similar resolution. / Ph. D.

No description available.

Applications in paleontological research are far from being limited to taxonomic collection and identification. Nor is such research limited to working solely on fossil data. Actualistic paleontology is the study of modern or recent organisms and processes to better understand those of the past. The bulk of this body of research falls under the category of actualistic paleontology, and examines geochronological methods and error biases in dating biological specimens ranging in age from modern to thousands of years old. Although such methods are arguably not perfect, error rates of ± a few hundred to few thousand years can be extremely important when considering ecological relationships among both Holocene taxa and time-averaged paleocommunities, but quite diminished when considering implications on more traditional dating techniques for ancient strata. Regardless, understanding implications of time resolution is important in analyses of and comparisons between any biological dataset. The following chapters are united by quantitative and statistical management of data with varying levels of temporal resolution, and represent four manuscripts that either are in press or soon to be submitted for publication. / Ph. D.