Retroviral vectors are used as mighty tools for an introduction of recombinant genes into the recipient genome in gene therapy trials. In the vector design, great emphasis is put on safety and efficiency. In spite of a great progress in retroviral vector design with the purpose to stabilize its expression, e.g. introduction of protective elements into the viral regulatory sequences, the current approaches are still not sufficiently effective and the majority of proviruses is transcriptionally silenced. The understanding of the silencing mechanism is of special importance to the optimization of the vector design and handling. In this master thesis, I have designed and constructed an expression system for study of the mechanism involved in the silencing of retroviruses integrated inside gene bodies. This artificial system will be utilized for testing of hypothesis that retroviruses integrated into gene bodies are silenced by DNMT-dependent mechanism and this process is triggered by transcriptional read-through of the provirus from nearby host promoter. I have obtained preliminary results suggesting the validity of the suggested hypothesis; however the verification of general validity of this hypothesis for various retroviruses and elements will be a matter of further studies in our laboratory. Powered by...

Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons account for approximately 10% of mouse and 8% of human genomes and may play a role in modifying gene expression. Many species harbor retrotransposon families encompassing both autonomous and non-autonomous members. Specifically, the mouse Early Transposon (ETn) family members lack all retroviral genes but are transcriptionally and retrotranspositionally active, causing over 20 known insertional germline mutations. ETns owe their retrotransposition potential to proteins encoded by structurally intact MusD retrotransposons with whom they share LTRs. ETn elements are transcribed at a much higher level than MusD retrotransposons in embryos and undifferentiated cells, suggesting their evasion of host restriction mechanisms. However, mechanisms responsible for the replicative success of non-autonomous retrotransposon subfamilies over their coding-competent relatives are poorly understood. In the first stage of my research, I analyzed regulatory sequences in an ETn LTR responsible for its high promoter activity in the undifferentiated cell line P19. I found that three GC-boxes that may function as Sp1/Sp3 binding sites act synergistically and are indispensable for undifferentiated cell-specific promoter activity of the LTR. Sp1 binding partners may be responsible for the restricted ETn expression. Moreover, I have shown that unlike many retroviruses, ETn elements possess multiple transcription initiation sites and that they have amplified via intracellular retrotransposition in the P19 teratocarcinoma cell line. In the next step of my research, I performed analysis of epigenetic mechanisms as a means of ERV suppression. Specifically, I showed that in embryonic stem cells, autonomous MusD retrotransposons are epigenetically suppressed to a greater degree than non-autonomous ETn retrotransposons, illustrated by a higher level of DNA methylation and a lower level of active histone modifications. I hypothesize that MusD elements may be silenced by DNA methylation and repressive chromatin spreading into the LTR from the CpG-rich internal retroviral sequence absent in ETn elements. I propose that internal structure largely devoid of high CG content enables ETn elements to evade host-imposed transcriptional repression, contributing to their high mutagenic activity in the mouse germline.

Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons account for approximately 10% of mouse and 8% of human genomes and may play a role in modifying gene expression. Many species harbor retrotransposon families encompassing both autonomous and non-autonomous members. Specifically, the mouse Early Transposon (ETn) family members lack all retroviral genes but are transcriptionally and retrotranspositionally active, causing over 20 known insertional germline mutations. ETns owe their retrotransposition potential to proteins encoded by structurally intact MusD retrotransposons with whom they share LTRs. ETn elements are transcribed at a much higher level than MusD retrotransposons in embryos and undifferentiated cells, suggesting their evasion of host restriction mechanisms. However, mechanisms responsible for the replicative success of non-autonomous retrotransposon subfamilies over their coding-competent relatives are poorly understood. In the first stage of my research, I analyzed regulatory sequences in an ETn LTR responsible for its high promoter activity in the undifferentiated cell line P19. I found that three GC-boxes that may function as Sp1/Sp3 binding sites act synergistically and are indispensable for undifferentiated cell-specific promoter activity of the LTR. Sp1 binding partners may be responsible for the restricted ETn expression. Moreover, I have shown that unlike many retroviruses, ETn elements possess multiple transcription initiation sites and that they have amplified via intracellular retrotransposition in the P19 teratocarcinoma cell line. In the next step of my research, I performed analysis of epigenetic mechanisms as a means of ERV suppression. Specifically, I showed that in embryonic stem cells, autonomous MusD retrotransposons are epigenetically suppressed to a greater degree than non-autonomous ETn retrotransposons, illustrated by a higher level of DNA methylation and a lower level of active histone modifications. I hypothesize that MusD elements may be silenced by DNA methylation and repressive chromatin spreading into the LTR from the CpG-rich internal retroviral sequence absent in ETn elements. I propose that internal structure largely devoid of high CG content enables ETn elements to evade host-imposed transcriptional repression, contributing to their high mutagenic activity in the mouse germline.

Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons account for approximately 10% of mouse and 8% of human genomes and may play a role in modifying gene expression. Many species harbor retrotransposon families encompassing both autonomous and non-autonomous members. Specifically, the mouse Early Transposon (ETn) family members lack all retroviral genes but are transcriptionally and retrotranspositionally active, causing over 20 known insertional germline mutations. ETns owe their retrotransposition potential to proteins encoded by structurally intact MusD retrotransposons with whom they share LTRs. ETn elements are transcribed at a much higher level than MusD retrotransposons in embryos and undifferentiated cells, suggesting their evasion of host restriction mechanisms. However, mechanisms responsible for the replicative success of non-autonomous retrotransposon subfamilies over their coding-competent relatives are poorly understood. In the first stage of my research, I analyzed regulatory sequences in an ETn LTR responsible for its high promoter activity in the undifferentiated cell line P19. I found that three GC-boxes that may function as Sp1/Sp3 binding sites act synergistically and are indispensable for undifferentiated cell-specific promoter activity of the LTR. Sp1 binding partners may be responsible for the restricted ETn expression. Moreover, I have shown that unlike many retroviruses, ETn elements possess multiple transcription initiation sites and that they have amplified via intracellular retrotransposition in the P19 teratocarcinoma cell line. In the next step of my research, I performed analysis of epigenetic mechanisms as a means of ERV suppression. Specifically, I showed that in embryonic stem cells, autonomous MusD retrotransposons are epigenetically suppressed to a greater degree than non-autonomous ETn retrotransposons, illustrated by a higher level of DNA methylation and a lower level of active histone modifications. I hypothesize that MusD elements may be silenced by DNA methylation and repressive chromatin spreading into the LTR from the CpG-rich internal retroviral sequence absent in ETn elements. I propose that internal structure largely devoid of high CG content enables ETn elements to evade host-imposed transcriptional repression, contributing to their high mutagenic activity in the mouse germline. / Medicine, Faculty of / Medical Genetics, Department of / Graduate

To explore the similarities and differences of regulatory circuits among budding yeasts, we characterized the role of unscheduled meiotic gene expression 6 (UME6) and a novel mating type switching pathway in Kluyveromyces lactis. We found that Ume6 was required for transcriptional silencing of the cryptic mating-type loci HMLα and HMRa. Ume6 acted directly at these loci by binding to the cis-regulatory silencers. Ume6 also served as a block to polyploidy and was required for repression of three meiotic genes, independently of the Rpd3 and Sin3 corepressors. Mating type switching from MATα to MATa required the α3 protein. The α3 protein was similar to transposases of the mutator like elements (MULEs). Mutational analysis showed that the DDE-motif in α3, which is conserved in MULEs was necessary for switching. During switching α3 mobilizes from the genome in the form of a DNA circle. The sequences encompassing the α3 gene circle junctions in the MATα locus were essential for switching from MATα to MATa. Switching also required a DNA binding protein, Mating type switch 1 (Mts1), whose binding sites in MATα were important. Expression of Mts1 was repressed in MATa/MATα diploids and by nutrients, limiting switching to haploids in low nutrient conditions. In a genetic selection for strains with increased switching rates we found a mutation in the RAS1 gene. By measuring the levels of the MTS1 mRNA and switching rates in ras1, pde2 and msn2 mutant strains we show that mating type switching in K. lactis was regulated by the RAS/cAMP pathway and the transcription factor Msn2. ras1 mutants contained 20-fold higher levels of MTS1 mRNA compared to wild type whereas pde2 and msn2 expressed less MTS1 mRNA and had decreased switching rates. Furthermore we found that MTS1 contained several potential Msn2 binding sites upstream of its ORF. We suggest that these observations explain the nutrient regulation of switching. / At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 3: Manuscript.

The Piwi interacting RNA pathway (piRNA) transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally silences transposons in the germline to maintain host genome integrity and faithful transmission of the genetic materials. In Drosophilaovaries, maternally loaded piRNAs kick-start piRNA biogenesis and convert precursor transcripts into piRNAs to replenish the piRNA pool during oogenesis. piRNA clusters are the genomic source of piRNA precursors, which are determined by the HP1 homolog Rhino and accessary factors. Rhino specifically binds to piRNA cluster chromatin. I was intrigued by how Rhino localizes to piRNA clusters to specify piRNA precursors. TREX is a conserved mRNA biogenesis complex composed of UAP56 and the THO complex. Identification of UAP56 as a cluster transcript-processing factor established the link between piRNA biogenesis and the general mRNA processing machinery. In my thesis, I investigated the functions of UAP56 and THO in piRNA cluster transcript processing. I characterized an RNP specific to cluster transcripts, defined by binding with both factors, which is distinct from RNP of bulk mRNA transcripts, and found that assembly of these RNPs depends on Rhino. These findings imply that piRNA precursors are specified co-transcriptionally. Additionally, I found that TREX mutants lead to a loss of Rhino binding specificity. I propose that Rhino and TREX co-transcriptionally scan for cluster and transposon sequences to establish loci that produce piRNA precursors. Surprisingly, I also discovered a piRNA-independent function for TREX in transposon silencing. I showed that TREX mutants lead to transcriptionally activation of a number of transposon families without affecting their piRNA biogenesis and piRNA mediated repressive histone modifications. I propose that TREX could mediate a conserved transposon silencing mechanism.

No description available.

Yeasts are unicellular eukaryotic microorganisms, capable of forming of organised multicellular communities, the colonies. Many yeast strains possess a characteristic colony morphology under defined living conditions. Another feature typical for many feral and pathogenic yeast strains is the ability to switch their morphotype. This phenomenon, called the phenotypic switching, contributes to a rapid adaptation to the changing harmful environment and is often connected with changes of the stress resistance or with the changes of virulence of pathogenic yeasts. Phenotypic switching can be observed even in non-pathogenic yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The strain BR-F, isolated from nature, switches under laboratory conditions from fluffy to smooth morphology of the strain BR-S. This phenotypic switch is accompanied by broad changes in the phenotype. Transcriptome analyses of the strains BR-F and BR-S have shown, among others, changes in expression of the subtelomeric genes that are under control of the histone acetylases and deacetylases. My work was aimed to the histone deacetylase Sir2p, which could influence the phenotypic switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The sir2 deletion mutant of the strain BR-S, prepared in our laboratory, was used for my studies. The results show, that the strain BR-S...

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from the wild are able to exhibit multicellular social behaviour and to form complex structured colonies resembling in many properties highly resistant biofilms of pathogenic yeasts. The capability of phenotypic variability, i.e. high frequency transition between two or more different phenotypes, is another feature typical for the wild yeast strains. Such phenotypic changes are in case of pathogenic yeast often connected with changes in virulence and resistance to stress and antifungal treatment. Long-term cultivation of the wild yeast strains under laboratory conditions leads to their domestication, i.e. transition to smooth colonies and loss of some features typical for structured colonies. This process is, similarly to phenotypic switching, accompanied by significant changes in gene expression and global change of colony lifestyle. Mechanisms underlying yeast phenotypic transitions are ascribed to epigenetic regulation of gene expression via transcriptional silencing conferred by histone deacetylases. This work deals with the study of such mechanisms using knock-outs of selected genes with putative function in formation of structured colonies in wild and domesticated strains. The achieved results show, that NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase Sir2p influences...

No description available.