Based on thesis (Ph.D.)--Universidad de Oviedo, 2006. / Originally presented as: La traducción al inglés en el siglo XVII : las comedias del Siglo de Oro español (University of Oviedo, 2006). Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references and index.

Thesis (doctoral)--Göteborgs universitet, 1982. / Summary in English. Includes bibliographical references (p. 138-142) and index.

Thesis (M.A.)--Denver Conservative Baptist Seminary, 1997. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 117-126).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 215-224).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2002. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references. Available also from UMI Company.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Hong Kong, 1984.

published_or_final_version / Chinese / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy

Self-translation is essentially a translation activity that involves one undertaking the task of rendering his/her own writings. A fundamental difference between conventional or third-party translators and self-translators is the fact that the latter has better access to their original intentions and the original cultural context of their work than the former. In spite of this seemingly ideal condition, together with the fact that self-translation has been practiced for centuries, the amount of academic interest it has received does not accurately reflect its true value and potential. Consequently, this dynamic practice has been underrated and frowned upon in literary studies until recent years. On the other hand, for many years, Yu Kwang-chung has been noted as a prolific and versatile poet and prose-writer but not so much as a translator and still less as a self-translator. This study, therefore, seeks to identify the efforts and contributions made by Yu Kwang-chung within the translation arena and to raise awareness on the usefulness of self-translations in helping us to understand Yu Kwang-chung’s works as a whole. Through conducting detailed investigations on existing literature, this study reveals the conscientious attitude Yu holds towards his translation career. Based on a complementary reading and analysis of Yu’s views on translation and the self-translation strategies he employs in rendering his bilingual book, The Night watchman, this research project identifies two unique features of Yu’s self-translation: in terms of sound, Yu tends to give musicality priority over mere correctness so as to maximize the musical qualities in his self-translation; with regards to sense, Yu’s manipulation on the meanings of imageries and cultural allusions reflects and reinforces the bicultural consciousness that is unique to Yu Kwang-chung’s works and himself as a literary figure. Two contrastive studies are also conducted to contrast the nature and characteristics of self-translation and third-party translations. These two studies demonstrate that Yu treats his self-translations and his translations of other people’s work very differently. While Yu generally follows the original closely when translating the works of other poets, his self-translations are proved to be much more liberal and flexible in nature. Finally, this study attempts to answer the question of whether Yu’s self-translation is a translation or a new creation. Despite the numerous alterations made, Yu faithfully translates the essence of his own originalities and tries to stay true to himself in the English text. In addition, since no translation can be completely new, this study takes the stance that Yu’s self-translation is not a new creation although the few extreme cases found in The Night Watchman may be treated as rewritings of the original. / published_or_final_version / Chinese / Master / Master of Philosophy

"March 1990". / Thesis (PhD)--Macquarie University, School of English & Linguistics, 1991. / Bibliography: leaves 219-221. / PART ONE: Research preliminaries -- The occurrence of shifts and the question of equivalence in translation -- Research methodology -- Theoretical orientation to the analysis of translation and texts -- The profile of major discourse types in Bahasa Indonesia -- PAERT TWO: Chapters of analysis -- The translation of procedural discourses -- The translation of hortatory discourses -- The translation of expository discourses -- The translation of narrative discourses -- PART THREE: Chapters of discussion -- Synthesis of translation shifts -- Translation types and translation equivalence at the textual level -- PART FOUR: Concluding chapter -- Conclusion and implications. / The study focuses on translation shifts, on their occurrence and their consequences, and especially how they relate to the question of equivalence in translation. For this purpose, eight Indonesian source language texts (SLTs) and eighty English translations (TLTs) were analysed, in terms of their, notional and prominent text features, rhetorical purpose, cohesion, topic-comment structures, and topical progression. The results of the analysis show how translators' behaviour and reactions to the SLTs vary, as indicated by divergencies in their translations. The variations indicate the kinds of shift fostered in the translation: obligatory and/or optional. -- Another fruit of the study is the identification of a number of shiftsensitive items in Indonesian grammar, such as /DI-/, /NG-/, /-LAH/. The textual effects of the shifts vary from the localized shift of interpersonal tenor to global shifts affecting text type and sub-type, and even to shifts of referential meaning. Although the shifts of text type and of sub-type show a tendency towards directness and neutrality, the shifts raise the question of whether or not the resulting TLTs can be considered as justified translations and as translation equivalences. The answer is the need to postulate a more flexible and wider view of equivalence, whilst setting up limits to acceptance of shifts which cause mistranslations, i.e shifts of referential meaning. This view provides a basis for distinguishing translation from adaptation and from mistranslation, a distinction which has hitherto been taken for granted in translation and in the training of translators. -- Appendices containing the TL texts (the SL texts are presented in each chapter of analysis) are presented at the back of the thesis. There is also a glossary of terms used in the study. / Mode of access: World Wide Web. / viii, 250 leaves

Thesis (MA (Hons))--Macquarie University, School of English and Linguistics, 1981. / Bibliography: leaves 245-255. / SECTION I: TRANSLATION AND MODERN LINGUISTICS -- An historical overview of translation and translation theory -- Linguistic relativity and translation -- Problems in translation -- Sacred texts and translation theory -- SECTION II: THE DYNAMIC EQUIVALENCE THEORY OF EUGENE A. NIDA -- An orientation to Nida's sociolinguistic theory of translation -- Grammatical analysis -- Semantic analysis -- Transfer and restructuring -- SECTION III: DE THEORY INCARNATE - THE TEV TRANSLATION OF THE NEW TESTAMENT -- A brief history of English Bible translation -- The Today's English Version: its background, purpose and nature -- The TEV evaluated -- SECTION IV: SPECIFIC PROBLEMS IN THE TEV AND KINDRED DE TRANSLATIONS -- The problems of language in DE translations -- The fate of technical terminology in DE translations -- Conclusion. / Translation theory has benefited from advances in many disciplines but it remains essentially the province of Comparative Linguistics and in particular Semantics. Recent developments have externalized processes used intuitively by translators for centuries. The literature is dominated by Eugene A. Nida whose work is informed by a wealth of experience in Bible translation. -- This thesis is a critique of the Dynamic Equivalence theory of translation propounded by Nida and exemplified in the Good News Bible (TEV). Section I surveys the history of translation, its theory and problems, and describes relevant developments in modern linguistics. Section II examines Nida's sociolinguistic model and his methods of grammatical and semantic analysis, transfer and restructuring. Section III studies the TEV New Testament with special attention to the language used and to such problems as cultural adaptation, ambiguity, and the fate of technical terminology. Section IV focuses on the language of the original to see to what extent "Common English" can adequately translate it. -- Nida has provided excellent discussion on almost every translation problem, as well as useful tools for semantic analysis. However, his DE model is found to be defective for Bible translation. Firstly, its "vehicular" theory of meaning does not do justice to the formal features of language. Secondly, while evaluation of a translation must take account of its purpose and intended audience, "equivalence" defined in terms of the receptors' reactions is impossible to measure, and blurs the distinction between "translation" and "communication". Finally, the determinative role given to receptor response makes it virtually impossible to preserve the sense of historical and cultural distance which Nida himself says is essential in Bible translation. / Mode of access: World Wide Web. / xii, 281 leaves