Submitted by Erika Demachki (erikademachki@gmail.com) on 2015-02-27T18:12:53Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - José Santana da Silva - 2014.pdf: 2049842 bytes, checksum: 513ce3d0c825870ec2294bff10b4a1f8 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Erika Demachki (erikademachki@gmail.com) on 2015-02-27T18:13:14Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - José Santana da Silva - 2014.pdf: 2049842 bytes, checksum: 513ce3d0c825870ec2294bff10b4a1f8 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-02-27T18:13:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - José Santana da Silva - 2014.pdf: 2049842 bytes, checksum: 513ce3d0c825870ec2294bff10b4a1f8 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-10-30 / Outros / This thesis is a history of union organization of workers in agriculture in the state of Goiás, between 1963 and 1992, that is, the foundation of the first unions to extinction of Rural Workers Trade Union Opposition. The starting point is the origin of the unions in the history of modern societies, created by the working class to combat the exploitation of its workforce. The Following are the definitions of bureaucracy, while social class relations and bureaucratic red tape, with the fundamental references formulations of Marx, Viana and Tragtenberg. The contributions of Weber and Lefort are secondary references. In characterizing the bureaucratization of unions, the analyzes of Luxembourg and Pannekoek are basic. Reconstitution of the bureaucratization of the union organization process in Brazil is based on works of national authors and analysis of trade union legislation. The theoretical and historical explanation is performed in the first chapter. The second is devoted to the emergence of rural unionism in the state of Goiás In the third and fourth story is addressed to the Federation of Agricultural Workers in the State of Goiás – Fetaeg – including the relationship with the Trade Union Opposition and the struggles of peasants and agricultural workers. In addition to bibliographical sources, journalistic sources, official documents of the Ministry of Labor, the state government, the unions of rural workers and Fetaeg were used. Some oral testimonies were used in a complementary manner. / A presente tese consiste numa história da organização sindical dos trabalhadores na agricultura no estado de Goiás, entre 1963 e 1992, isto é, da fundação dos primeiros sindicatos à extinção da Oposição Sindical dos Trabalhadores Rurais. O ponto de partida é a origem dos sindicatos na história das sociedades modernas, criados pela classe operária para combater a exploração da sua força de trabalho. A seguir, são apresentadas as definições dos conceitos de burocracia, enquanto classe social, relações burocráticas e burocratização, tendo como referências fundamentais as formulações de Marx, Viana e Tragtenberg. As contribuições de Weber e de Lefort são referências secundárias. Na caracterização da burocratização dos sindicatos, as análises de Luxemburgo e de Pannekoek são basilares. A reconstituição do processo de burocratização da organização sindical no Brasil é feita com base em trabalhos de autores nacionais e na análise da legislação sindical. A explanação teórica e histórica é realizada no primeiro capítulo. O segundo é dedicado ao surgimento do sindicalismo rural no estado de Goiás. No terceiro e no quarto é abordada a história da Federação dos Trabalhadores na Agricultura no Estado de Goiás – FETAEG –, incluindo a relação com a Oposição Sindical e com as lutas dos camponeses e assalariados agrícolas. Além das fontes bibliográficas, foram utilizadas fontes jornalísticas, documentos oficiais do Ministério do Trabalho, do governo estadual, dos sindicatos de trabalhadores rurais e da FETAEG. Alguns depoimentos orais foram usados em caráter complementar.

No description available.

<p>In February 2011, a wave of creative direct action swept across postal depots in the city of Edmonton which saw rank-and-file workers organizing outside of the channels of formal-legal unionism. Fighting against management’s imposition of compulsory overtime as a staffing measure, Letter Carriers and other “outside” postal workers relied on solidarity and resistance at the point of production in a successful campaign to put an end to this practice. The relevance of this particular struggle to the Canadian labour movement is twofold. First, the intensified workloads of Edmonton postal workers reflect a wider shift in the nature of employment relationships away from the existence of employer support as part of the rise of neoliberal capitalism. Second, the choice of workers to organize at a distance from the historically militant Canadian Union of Postal Workers reveals both the predicament facing labour of a highly restrictive formal labour relations system as well as an alternative path of resistance. For Edmonton postal workers, this path was forged in large part as a result of the influence of IWW dual-carder organizers and, more specifically, their introduction of a mode of union praxis known as solidarity unionism</p> / Master of Arts (MA)