Este trabalho tem como objetivo principal apreender as mais importantes elaborações de Celso Furtado a partir do debate sobre o desenvolvimento brasileiro nas décadas de 1950 e 1960. Enfocando a construção teórico-metodológica da sua interpretação do subdesenvolvimento brasileiro e sua importância para o movimento nacionalista desenvolvimentista, bem como sua participação no debate político e intelectual que esta vertente do pensamento social e político brasileiro travou com alguns acadêmicos do Departamento de Ciências Sociais da USP. A análise deste debate destaca as divergências entre os conceitos de subdesenvolvimento de Celso Furtado e de dependência segundo a interpretação elaborada por Fernando Henrique Cardoso. / This work has as objective main to apprehend the most important elaborations of Celso Furtado from the debate about the Brazilian development in the decades of 1950 and 1960. Focusing the construction theoretician of your interpretation of the Brazilian underdevelopment and importance for the nacional-desenvolvimentista movement, as well as your participation in the debate politician and intellectual with some of the academics of the Department of Social Sciences of the USP, that market this source of the Brazilian social and politician theory. The analysis of this debate detaches the divergences between the concepts of underdevelopment Celso Furtado and dependence according to interpretation elaborated for Fernando Henrique Cardoso.

Este trabalho tem como objetivo principal apreender as mais importantes elaborações de Celso Furtado a partir do debate sobre o desenvolvimento brasileiro nas décadas de 1950 e 1960. Enfocando a construção teórico-metodológica da sua interpretação do subdesenvolvimento brasileiro e sua importância para o movimento nacionalista desenvolvimentista, bem como sua participação no debate político e intelectual que esta vertente do pensamento social e político brasileiro travou com alguns acadêmicos do Departamento de Ciências Sociais da USP. A análise deste debate destaca as divergências entre os conceitos de subdesenvolvimento de Celso Furtado e de dependência segundo a interpretação elaborada por Fernando Henrique Cardoso. / This work has as objective main to apprehend the most important elaborations of Celso Furtado from the debate about the Brazilian development in the decades of 1950 and 1960. Focusing the construction theoretician of your interpretation of the Brazilian underdevelopment and importance for the nacional-desenvolvimentista movement, as well as your participation in the debate politician and intellectual with some of the academics of the Department of Social Sciences of the USP, that market this source of the Brazilian social and politician theory. The analysis of this debate detaches the divergences between the concepts of underdevelopment Celso Furtado and dependence according to interpretation elaborated for Fernando Henrique Cardoso.

This essay is a critical textual analysis of the poetry of Robert Lowell with focus on religious symbolism used in his work, and the Catholic theology which informed it. This results in a new, contrasting interpretation to the conventional view that he had abandoned his religious focus by mid-career, while accounting for his own assessment that he had not. Insights gained through this analysis, combined with those relating to Lowell’s personal history, reframe his confessional poetry while bolstering this claim.  Through this study, poems selected from Lord Weary’s Castle, The Mills of the Kavanaughs, Life Studies and For the Union Dead are reinterpreted in order to explore the consequences of what Lowell could have intended with this stylistic modification, and discover the religiosity that he claimed was hidden. Lowell’s confessional poetry up until 1964 is examined and recast as the anguished wails of a Catholic soul in Purgatory. This fresh approach to one of America’s finest twentieth-century poets provides a novel foundation for the reinterpretation of the entirety of Lowell’s professional oeuvre.