Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-04T18:21:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 SAMUEL CUSIN PUPO.pdf: 7533186 bytes, checksum: 5d1c8f3028d469d348664bd4270c5bc7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-02-23 / In view of the environmental conflicts arising from the capitalist development in urban areas, this research goal is to analyze the institutional innovations of civil society participation and question analytically the political representation practiced by the Boards of Public Policies Management, from the perspective of the traditional political representation. For that, the research presents a case-study of public policy management of rainwater, from the program Saneamento para todos (from the Federal Government) in Jundia?, S?o Paulo State and the existing conflicts between the Municipal Public Power, the real state market and the structure of the municipal councils at urban and environmental management area. It also analyses critically the new dilemmas that emerged after twenty years of institution institutionalization of the model of the management councils of public policies, and under in a comprehensive view, the process of democratic reform and improvement of urban management itself. The method used is a case-study with a participant observation, bibliographic, documentary research and semi-structured interviews with representatives of COMDEMA, Management Board of the Serra do Japi, Committee on the Master Plan and the Movement in defense of rivers and streams from Jundiai and region. / A presente pesquisa, tendo em vista os conflitos ambientais decorrentes do desenvolvimento capitalista no espa?o urbano, tem por finalidade analisar as inova??es institucionais de participa??o da sociedade civil e problematizar analiticamente a representa??o pol?tica exercida pelos Conselhos Gestores de Pol?ticas P?blicas, sob a ?tica da representa??o pol?tica tradicional. Para tanto, realiza um estudo de caso sobre a pol?tica p?blica de manejo de ?guas pluviais, do programa Saneamento Para Todos do Governo Federal, no munic?pio de Jundia?, estado de S?o Paulo e os conflitos existentes entre o poder p?blico municipal, o mercado imobili?rio e a estrutura dos Conselhos Municipais na ?rea da gest?o urbana e ambiental. Tamb?m analisa criticamente os novos dilemas surgidos ap?s vinte anos de institucionaliza??o do modelo de Conselhos Gestores de Pol?ticas P?blicas, e sob um aspecto mais geral, o pr?prio processo de reforma democr?tica e aprimoramento da gest?o urbana. O m?todo utilizado ? o estudo de caso com a realiza??o de observa??o participante, levantamento bibliogr?fico, pesquisa documental e entrevistas semi-estruturadas com representantes do COMDEMA, Conselho de Gest?o da Serra do Japi, Comiss?o do Plano Diretor Municipal e Movimento em Defesa dos Rios e C?rregos de Jundia? e Regi?o.