Vascular stents have become a standard for treating atherosclerosis due to distinct advantages in trauma and cost with other surgical techniques. Unfortunately, the therapy is hindered by the risk of a new blockage (termed restenosis) developing in the treated artery. Clinical studies have indicated that stent design is a major risk factor for restenosis, with failure rates varying from 20 to 40% for bare metal stents. Subsequently, there has been a significant effort devoted to reducing failure rates by covering stents in polymer coatings in which anti-proliferative drugs are embedded, however complications have arisen (e.g. incomplete endothelization, lack of success in peripheral arteries, lack of long-term follow-up studies) that have limited the success of this technology. It has been thought that restenosis is directly related to the mechanical conditions that vascular stents create. Moreover, it has been hypothesized that stents that induce higher non-physiologic stresses result in a more aggressive pathobiological response that can lead to restenosis development. In this study, a combination of computational modeling and in vivo analysis were conducted to investigate the artery stent-induced wall stresses, and subsequent biological inflammatory response. In particular, variations in stent design were investigated as a means of examining specific stent design criteria that minimize the mechanical impact of stenting. Collectively, these data indicate that stent designs that subject the artery wall to higher stress values result in significantly more neointimal tissue proliferation, therefore, confirming the aforementioned hypothesis. Moreover, this work provides valuable insight into the role that biomechanics can play in improving the success rate of this percutaneous therapy and overall patient care.