Thesis (M.A.)--Ohio State University, 1922. / Available online via OhioLINK's ETD Center.

Published also as Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Illinois, 1916. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 140-142).

Published also as Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Illinois, 1916. / Bibliography: p. 140-142.

Ever since her participation in UN in 1971, the PRC has exercised 23 times of veto power on non-procedural matters of UN Security Council. This thesis not only introduces thoroughly the individual case of PRC using 23 times of veto power, but also purports to apprehend, in light of the national interest, the behavior of PRC exercising veto power in the UN Security Council.

Thesis (doctoral)--Friedrich-Alexander-Universität zu Erlangen.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2006. / Title from first page of PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. 100-102).

Humboldt Univ., Diss.--Berlin, 1997. / Includes index.

This study investigates the effects of institutional structure on the privacy rights regimes in the United States and the United Kingdom, from 2000-2006. The goal of this research is to analyze how variation in the institutional arrangements across these two countries allowed for more or less protection of privacy rights for citizens. Domestic terrorist attacks during the time period represent a catalyst for changes in police and government surveillance activities. Veto points literature provides the framework for institutional comparison. The first part of the research provides a discussion of the historical evolution of privacy rights in both states, focusing on government and police surveillance and investigations. The second part of the research, based on veto points theory, compares the institutional arrangements of the United States and the United Kingdom, and suggests that the number of veto points and the ideological proximity of veto players have had an effect on the formulation of policy. Laws governing surveillance, investigations and privacy in the year 2000 provide a benchmark for analyzing how policies change over time.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:22:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Fabiano Esteves de Barros Pavezi.pdf: 896270 bytes, checksum: 280ce193d2f0742e358d67171b2aac25 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-08-12 / A dissertation submitted for completion of Master of Law focuses the analysis of "limits the power of veto actions Golden Share". The Constitution guarantees the right to private property and free enterprise from the operation of economic activity as it thinks fit. The purpose of the particular, to explore certain economic activity has a single purpose, namely, the pursuit of profit and increase your personal wealth. However, in the eagerness of pursuit of profit, knows clearly that these same entrepreneurs do not hesitate to violate the rights of others, including the community. At this time, the state should interfere in economic activity in order to maintain order and social rights. The more relevant the corporate exploited by private, sharper will be the pursuit of profit. Classic examples are the activities that were previously operated by the State and through privatizations, go to the particular domain. The Golden Share is a very effective way for the state to control these abuses. However, such actions have to be used to maintain public interest in these activities most relevant economic and not as a means "political" to interfere in the private sector. Here arises the need to research and study the limits of these proceedings, that the power granted to the State is not being used for another purpose, such as the aforementioned policy / A dissertação apresentada para conclusão do mestrado em Direito tem como objeto a análise dos limites do poder de veto das ações Golden Share . A Constituição Federal garante aos particulares o direito de propriedade e a livre iniciativa da exploração da atividade econômica como bem lhe aprouver. O objetivo do particular, ao explorar determinada atividade econômica possui um único fim, qual seja, a perseguição do lucro e aumento de seu patrimônio pessoal. Contudo, no afã da busca do lucro, sabe-se claramente que estes mesmos empresários não hesitam em violar direitos de outras pessoas, inclusive da coletividade. Neste momento, deve o Estado interferir na atividade econômica, de forma a manter a ordem e os direitos sociais. Quanto mais relevante o objeto social explorado pelo particular, mais aguçada será a perseguição do lucro. Exemplos clássicos são as atividades que até então eram exploradas pelo Estado e que, através de privatizações, passam ao domínio do particular. A Golden Share é um meio muito eficaz para o Estado controlar estes abusos. Porém, tais ações têm que ser utilizadas para manter o interesse público nestas atividades de maior relevância econômica e não como meio político de interferir na iniciativa privada. Aqui surge a necessidade de pesquisar e estudar os limites destas atuações, para que a faculdade conferida ao ente Estatal não seja utilizada com outra finalidade, tal como a política acima citada

Bachelor-Arbeit Univ. St. Gallen, 2004.