Spelling suggestions: "subject:"viscometer""
11 |
Shear Induced Migration of Particles in a Yield Stress FluidGholami, Mohammad January 2017 (has links)
No description available.
|
12 |
Investigation of physical mechanisms during deconstruction of pretreated lignocellulosic matrix and its ability to liberate a fermentable carbon substrate in a bio-process / Compréhansion des mécanismes de destructuration de la matière cellulosique après prétraitement et de son aptitude à libérer un substrat carbone fermentescible dans un bioprocédéLe, Tuan 10 May 2017 (has links)
La biomasse lignocellulosique comprend les sous-produits agricoles et industriels pouvant être utilisés comme matière première dans des bioprocédés variés destinés à produire des molécules d'intérêt énergétique ou chimique. Ces ressources lignocellulosiques, peuvent notamment être fournies par l'industrie papetière qui est particulièrement adaptée pour les bio-raffineries modernes car elle est en capacité de produire en grande quantité un substrat ayant une faible teneur en lignine et sans composés inhibiteurs. La bagasse de canne à sucre est également un substrat prometteur par sa composition chimique simple et son abondance dans les pays tropicaux. Lors de l'utilisation de ces substrats, l'hydrolyse enzymatique constitue une étape cruciale permettant la transformation des fibres de cellulose en une source de carbone fermentescible. Si les aspects biochimiques de cette étape d'hydrolyse font l'objet de nombreuses recherches et de développements, les réactions sous haute teneur en matière sèche font apparaître des limitations physiques qui sont beaucoup moins étudiées et analysées mais constituent des verrous scientifiques et technologiques qui freinent actuellement l'utilisation de cette ressource abondante et durable. Ce travail s'inscrit dans ce contexte et propose l'étude de cette étape d'hydrolyse enzymatique de la lignocellulose en s'intéressant conjointement aux aspects biochimiques et physiques de façon à aller vers une compréhension et une maîtrise des transferts (de masse, de chaleur) dans les réactions à forte concentration en substrat. La stratégie adoptée a consisté à réaliser et analyser des réactions d'hydrolyse sous différentes conditions opératoires en travaillant dans un premier temps sur des concentrations intermédiaires (suspension semi-diluée), c'est-à-dire en introduisant, mais de façon limitée, les complexités dues aux interactions entre particules/fibres de lignocellulose. Les résultats obtenus sont ensuite utilisés pour élaborer une stratégie adaptée aux fortes concentrations. Les aspects physiques analysés sont essentiellement le comportement rhéologique du milieu réactionnel ainsi que la morpho-granulométrie des objets en suspension. Différentes métrologies, tant in-situ que ex-situ, ont été mises en œuvre et apportent des résultats complémentaires. Les études ont été menées sur un substrat de référence, le papier Whatman, et deux substrats à vocation industrielle: la pâte à papier et la bagasse de canne à sucre. La stratégie d'étude porte sur les aspects suivants: (i) le suivi de l'évolution des comportements rhéologiques et des propriétés morphologiques des suspensions au cours de l'hydrolyse, (ii) l'étude des mécanismes d'hydrolyse lors de la dégradation des substrats, (iii) l'étude de l'impact de la composition et de la structure des substrats sur les cinétiques de solubilisation et d'hydrolyse, (iv) la quantification de la contribution des différentes activités enzymatiques, seules ou en mélange par une approche physique multi-échelle et (v) le contrôle et l'optimisation des conditions d'alimentation dans un procédé discontinu alimenté (fed-batch) afin d'atteindre des conditions de milieu concentré. Les chapitres 1 et 2 de ce document sont consacrés à une étude bibliographique du sujet et à la présentation des matériels et méthodes mis en œuvre. Le troisième chapitre présente les résultats obtenus et leur analyse. Il est constitué de trois sections: tout d'abord une étude des propriétés des différents enzymes ou cocktail d'enzymes utilisés, des substrats retenus et des suspensions avec, notamment, la détermination des régimes semi-dilués et concentrés. Ensuite sont présentées et analysées les hydrolyses effectuées en milieu semi-dilué. Les mécanismes d'hydrolyse (fragmentation, solubilisation, hydratation et séparation des agglomérats) sont étudiés pour diverses concentrations et divers enzymes/cocktails. Enfin les résultats en milieu concentré sont présentés dans une dernière section. / Lignocellulosic biomass consists of several agriculture and industrial by-products that can be used as raw material for several bioprocesses to obtain range of products. Among lignocellulosic sources, the pulp & paper industry is appropriated for modern bio-refining thank to pulp with low lignin content and free of inhibitory compounds. Besides, sugarcane bagasse is a very promising feedstock because of its simple chemical composition and its abundancy especially in tropical countries. In the bioconversion of lignocellulose, enzymatic hydrolysis is a crucial step that allows the transformation of cellulosic and hemicellulosic fibers into fermentable carbon sources. The lack of knowledge about physical limitations and hydrolysis mechanisms, especially at high dry matter content, stands as the main barrier which forbids the scale-up of bio-refinery processes. Thus, the efficient and sustainable use of lignocellulosic resources is currently a major challenge and need to be investigated. In this context, this PhD focused on the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose by both physical and biochemical approaches. The strategy consisted in carrying out and in analyzing the hydrolysis reactions under different operating conditions with semi-dilute suspensions. Then, obtained results were used to develop a hydrolysis strategy for concentrated suspensions. Different methodologies, in- and ex-situ analyses, were implemented and provided complementary results. From physical approach, analyses consisted in rheological behavior of suspensions as well as the morpho-granulometry of particles. The study was carried out on a reference substrate, Whatman paper, and on two industrial substrates, paper pulp and sugarcane bagasse. The strategy aimed to investigate different stakes: (i) evolution of rheological behaviors and the morphological properties of suspensions, (ii) hydrolysis mechanisms during the degradation of substrates, (iii) impact of substrate composition and structure on solubilization and hydrolysis kinetics, (iv) quantification of the contribution of single enzyme and enzyme mixture activities by multi-scale physical approaches and (v) control and optimization of feeding parameters for fed-batch process in order to access to concentrated suspension. Chapters 1 and 2 of this document are devoted to a research bibliographic and presentation of materials and methods. The third chapter presents obtained results and discussion in three sections. The first one is a study of the properties of different enzymes and substrates, in particular, the determination of semi-dilute and concentrated regime. Subsequently the enzymatic hydrolysis at semi-dilute regime is presented to highlight the hydrolysis mechanisms (fragmentation, solubilization, solvation and agglomerate separation) in relationship with enzyme mixtures and dosages. Finally, results in concentrated regime are discussed in the final section.
|
13 |
Viscosity of slags / Viskosität von SchlackenBronsch, Arne 06 October 2017 (has links) (PDF)
Slags plays a significant role at high temperature processes. The estimation of the slag viscosity is vital for the safe run of e.g. entrained flow gasifiers. One opportunity of determination is rotational viscometry. This technique is disadvantageous in view of elevated temperatures, applied materials and the necessary time. Additionally, the viscosity can be predicted by the help of viscosity models, where viscosity is a function of slag composition and temperature. Due to changing slag properties within the technical processes, the calculated viscosities can hugely differ from measured ones.
In this work, the viscosities of 42 slags where measured up to 100 Pa s and temperatures up to 1700 °C. Oxidizing and reducing conditions were applied. Additionally, selected slag samples were quenched at defined temperatures to qualitatively and quantitatively determine the formed minerals by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Differential temperature analysis (DTA) was applied to find the onset of crystallization for the complementation of investigations.
The Einstein-Roscoe equation was chosen to improve the classic viscosity models. Reducing atmosphere decreased viscosity and the number of formed minerals was increased. Slags show a shear-thinning behavior above ca. 10 vol.-% of solid mineral matter. Also, Newtonian behavior was observed up to 60 vol.-%. To overcome problems with the kinetic cooling behavior of the slags, a viscosity approximation method was applied afterwards. This can result in optimized viscosity predictions when several preconditions are fulfilled.
|
14 |
Viscosity of slagsBronsch, Arne 13 July 2017 (has links)
Slags plays a significant role at high temperature processes. The estimation of the slag viscosity is vital for the safe run of e.g. entrained flow gasifiers. One opportunity of determination is rotational viscometry. This technique is disadvantageous in view of elevated temperatures, applied materials and the necessary time. Additionally, the viscosity can be predicted by the help of viscosity models, where viscosity is a function of slag composition and temperature. Due to changing slag properties within the technical processes, the calculated viscosities can hugely differ from measured ones.
In this work, the viscosities of 42 slags where measured up to 100 Pa s and temperatures up to 1700 °C. Oxidizing and reducing conditions were applied. Additionally, selected slag samples were quenched at defined temperatures to qualitatively and quantitatively determine the formed minerals by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Differential temperature analysis (DTA) was applied to find the onset of crystallization for the complementation of investigations.
The Einstein-Roscoe equation was chosen to improve the classic viscosity models. Reducing atmosphere decreased viscosity and the number of formed minerals was increased. Slags show a shear-thinning behavior above ca. 10 vol.-% of solid mineral matter. Also, Newtonian behavior was observed up to 60 vol.-%. To overcome problems with the kinetic cooling behavior of the slags, a viscosity approximation method was applied afterwards. This can result in optimized viscosity predictions when several preconditions are fulfilled.:List of Tables ............................................................................................................ vi
List of Figures ........................................................................................................ viii
Symbols and Abbreviations .................................................................................. xviii
1. Introduction and Aim ....................................................................................... 1
2. General Overview of Slag ............................................................................... 2
2.1 Viscosity ...................................................................................................... 2
2.1.1 Viscosity Introduction ........................................................................... 2
2.1.2 Flow behavior of fluids ......................................................................... 3
2.2 Slag Definition and Phase Diagrams ........................................................... 4
2.3 Solid Slag Structure .................................................................................... 5
2.4 Liquid Slag Structure ................................................................................. 10
2.5 Basicity and B/A-ratio ................................................................................ 11
2.6 Slag Components...................................................................................... 13
2.6.1 Silicon dioxide .................................................................................... 13
2.6.2 Aluminum oxide ................................................................................. 13
2.6.3 Calcium oxide .................................................................................... 15
2.6.4 Iron oxide ........................................................................................... 16
2.6.5 Magnesium Oxide .............................................................................. 18
2.6.6 Potassium Oxide ................................................................................ 19
2.6.7 Sodium Oxide .................................................................................... 20
2.6.8 Titanium Oxide ................................................................................... 21
2.6.9 Phosphorous ...................................................................................... 22
2.6.10 Sulfur .............................................................................................. 22
2.7 Summary of Last Chapters ........................................................................ 23
3. Slag Viscosity Toolbox .................................................................................. 25
3.1 Slag Viscosity Predictor............................................................................. 25
3.2 Slag Viscosity Database............................................................................ 26
3.3 Prediction Quality of Viscosity Models ....................................................... 27
4. Classic Slag Viscosity Modelling ................................................................... 30
4.1 Selected Classic Viscosity Models ............................................................ 31
4.1.1 S2 ....................................................................................................... 32
4.1.2 Watt-Fereday ..................................................................................... 32
4.1.3 Bomkamp ........................................................................................... 32
4.1.4 Shaw .................................................................................................. 32
4.1.5 Lakatos .............................................................................................. 33
4.1.6 Urbain ................................................................................................ 33
4.1.7 Riboud ............................................................................................... 33
4.1.8 Streeter .............................................................................................. 34
4.1.9 Kalmanovitch-Frank ........................................................................... 34
4.1.10 BBHLW .......................................................................................... 34
4.1.11 Duchesne ....................................................................................... 34
4.1.12 ANNliq ............................................................................................ 35
4.2 Need of Improvement in Viscosity Literature ............................................. 35
4.3 Summary of Last Chapters ........................................................................ 36
5. Advanced Slag Viscosity Modelling .............................................................. 37
5.1 Crystallization ............................................................................................ 37
5.1.1 Nucleation .......................................................................................... 38
5.1.2 Crystallization Rate ............................................................................ 39
5.1.3 Crystallization Measurement Methods ............................................... 39
5.2 Slag Properties Changes During Crystallization ........................................ 40
5.2.1 Slag Density ....................................................................................... 40
5.2.2 Solid Volume Fraction ........................................................................ 46
5.2.3 Estimation of Slag Composition During Cooling ................................. 46
5.3 Viscosity Depending on Particles and Shear Rate..................................... 47
5.3.1 Einstein-Roscoe Equation .................................................................. 48
5.3.2 Improved Modelling Approach by Modified Einstein-Roscoe .............. 49
5.4 Summary of Last Chapters ........................................................................ 50
6. Experimental Procedures ............................................................................. 52
6.1 Viscosity Measurements ........................................................................... 52
6.1.1 Estimating Parameter Ranges of Viscosity Measurements ................ 53
6.1.2 Viscosity Measurement Procedure ..................................................... 54
6.2 Thermal Analysis of Slags ......................................................................... 55
6.2.1 Experimental Conditions of DTA ........................................................ 55
6.3 Phase Determination ................................................................................. 55
6.3.1 Quench Experiment Processing ......................................................... 56
6.3.2 Phase Determination on XRD Results ............................................... 56
6.4 Summary of Last Chapters ........................................................................ 57
7. Results and Discussion ................................................................................ 58
7.1 Selected Slag Samples ............................................................................. 58
7.1.1 Slag Sample Composition Before Viscosity Measurements ............... 58
7.1.2 Slag Sample Composition After Viscosity Measurements .................. 59
7.2 General Results of Viscosity Measurements ............................................. 60
7.2.1 Viscosity under Air Atmosphere ......................................................... 63
7.2.2 Viscosity under Reducing Atmospheres ............................................. 65
7.2.3 Viscosity under Constant Partial Oxygen Pressure ............................ 66
7.2.4 Summary of Last Chapter .................................................................. 68
7.3 Mineral Formation ..................................................................................... 69
7.3.1 General Results on Primarily Mineral Formation ................................ 69
7.3.2 Influences on Primarily Mineral Formation ......................................... 70
7.3.3 Mineral Formation over Wide Temperature Ranges ........................... 71
7.3.4 Summary of Last Chapter .................................................................. 77
7.4 Results Obtained by DTA .......................................................................... 78
7.4.1 Comparing Results obtained by DTA and Quenching ........................ 80
7.4.2 Summary of Last Chapter .................................................................. 82
7.5 Shear Rate Influence on Slag Viscosity ..................................................... 82
7.5.1 Shear Rate Influence under Oxidizing Atmospheres .......................... 83
7.5.2 Shear Rate Influence under Reducing Atmospheres .......................... 87
7.5.3 Shear Rate Influence under Constant Atmospheres .......................... 91
7.5.4 Summary of chapter ........................................................................... 92
7.6 Atmospheric Influence on Viscosity ........................................................... 93
7.6.1 Summary of Last Chapter .................................................................. 95
7.7 Cooling Rate Influence on Slag Viscosity .................................................. 95
7.7.1 Summary of Last Chapter .................................................................. 97
8. Advanced Viscosity Modelling Approach ...................................................... 99
8.1 Prediction Quality of Classical Viscosity Models ........................................ 99
8.1.1 Selecting the Best Viscosity Model for Newtonian Flow ..................... 99
8.1.2 Summary of Last Chapter ................................................................ 103
8.2 Predicting Liquidus Temperature ............................................................. 103
8.2.1 Comparing Liquidus Calculations and Quenching Experiments ....... 103
8.2.2 Comparing DTA Results and Liquidus Calculations ......................... 105
8.2.3 Summary of Last Chapter ................................................................ 107
8.3 Predicting Liquid Slag Composition ......................................................... 108
8.3.1 Results of Slag Composition Calculations at Oxidizing Conditions ... 108
8.3.2 Results of Slag Composition Calculations at Reducing Conditions ... 110
8.3.3 Summary of Last Chapter ................................................................ 111
8.4 Modelling Approach ................................................................................ 112
8.4.1 Development of Datasets for Advanced Viscosity Modeling ............. 113
8.4.2 Summary of Last Chapter ................................................................ 116
8.5 Results of Advanced Slag Viscosity Modelling Approach ........................ 116
8.5.1 Summary of Last Chapter ................................................................ 121
9. Summary .................................................................................................... 123
10. Appendix: Information on Classic Viscosity Modelling ................................. 126
10.1 Backgrounds of Applied Viscosity Models............................................ 126
10.2 Viscosity Model of the BCURA (S2) ..................................................... 129
10.3 Watt-Fereday ....................................................................................... 130
10.4 Bomkamp ............................................................................................ 130
10.5 Shaw ................................................................................................... 131
10.6 Lakatos Model ..................................................................................... 132
10.7 Urbain Model ....................................................................................... 133
10.8 Riboud Model ...................................................................................... 134
10.9 Streeter Model ..................................................................................... 136
10.10 Kalmanovitch-Frank Model .................................................................. 137
10.11 BBHLW Model ..................................................................................... 137
10.12 Duchesne Model .................................................................................. 139
10.13 ANNliq Model ...................................................................................... 141
11. Appendix: Settings of Equilibrium Calculations ........................................... 143
12. Appendix: Parameters of Einstein-Roscoe Equation ................................... 153
13. Appendix: Ash and Slag Sample Preparation ............................................. 155
14. Appendix: Experimental Procedures: Viscometer ....................................... 159
14.1 General Viscometer Description .......................................................... 159
14.2 Temperature Calibration ...................................................................... 160
14.3 Viscometer Calibration ......................................................................... 160
14.4 Accuracy and Reproducibility of HT-Viscosity Measurements .............. 161
14.5 Influence of Inductive Heating .............................................................. 163
14.6 Influence of Measurement System Materials ....................................... 164
15. Appendix: Experimental Procedures: Quenching Furnace .......................... 167
16. Appendix: Slag Sample Parameters and Composition ................................ 168
17. Appendix: Slag Viscosity Measurements Results ....................................... 175
18. Appendix: Viscosities at Different Cooling Rates ........................................ 182
19. Appendix: Slag Viscosity Modelling: AALE Calculations ............................. 187
20. Appendix: Advanced Viscosity Modelling: a-factors .................................... 193
21. Appendix: Slag Mineral Phase Investigations and Modelling ...................... 197
22. Appendix: Results of DTA Measurements on Slags .................................... 207
23. Appendix: Advanced Slag Viscosity Modelling Approach ............................ 211
References ........................................................................................................... 228
|
Page generated in 0.0553 seconds