• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Asyl vs. Exklusion - En undersökning av förhållandet mellan rätten till asyl och exklusion samt hur verkställighetshinder och non-refoulementprincipen förhindrar utvisning vid avslag på ansökan om asyl. / Asylum vs. Exclusion - An examination of the relationship between the right to asylum and exclusion as well as how the obstacles to enforcement and non-refoulement principle prevent deportation at the refusal of asylum.

Barjandi, Behnaz January 2017 (has links)
No description available.
2

Proces s K. H. Frankem před mimořádným lidovým soudem / The Trial with K. H. Frank in front of the Extraordinary People's Court

Vozdek, Jakub January 2012 (has links)
In my Master's thesis I described in detail the historical process of war criminal Karl Hermann Frank. He was a man who had been influencing the main events in the Czech lands for many years. I divided the thesis in ten chapters. The first chapter is devoted to the personality of K. H. Frank. I tried to briefly describe all the life's milestones of a man justly sentenced to death for his crimes against the Czechoslovak state. In the second and third chapter I focused on two men who played a very important role in the process and extradition of K. H. Frank, Kamill Resler and Bohuslav Ečer. In subsequent chapters I fully dealt with the process itself, from the very start through the daily courses of the trial to the verdict. In conclusion I summarized findings from the process and answer the question about the objectivity of proceedings against the accused.

Page generated in 0.0745 seconds