Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-05-14T13:11:59Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
468576 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 251154 bytes, checksum: cd0e4dc1bde63e9bc3163143fb40d034 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-05-14T13:11:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
468576 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 251154 bytes, checksum: cd0e4dc1bde63e9bc3163143fb40d034 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-02-26 / In the Paternal Procedural System (PPS of 1973 and the new PPS), implement the suspension rule of sentence effects in the event of an application for appeal, which is longer included by the legislature only for certain sentences categories exhaustively indicated in the Civil Procedure Code and externally to this, in fancy law. The main problem of the existence of this rule is the fact that this constitutes an insurmountable obstacle to the effectiveness of those sentences that have no immediate effect under the Law, but, however, need it by the tutelary right equipment at the risk of damage or extinction, and therefore, cannot even wait for the deadline on which proceedings were an appropriate resource to be satisfied and issued to its holder, problem which, therefore, must be addressed in the light the procedural content of the 1988 Federal Constitution and of the fundamental rights applicable to the Civil Proceedings, and with particular emphasis, of the adequate right-guaranteed fundamental to the judicial, timely and effective protection. In both the 1973 PPS and the new PPS, the solution is found in their own national plan by applying the technique of granting ope judicis immediate effectiveness, i.e., through the use of anticipatory provision in the sentence or upon appeal in order to remove the suspension and to release the immediate execution. To verify the legitimacy of the proposed solution, this study made use of the Application Method of the proportionality principle proposed by Robert Alexy, through which it was observed that the ope judicis immediate effectiveness technique of the decision implemented through the application of the Anticipatory Provision in the sentential act or upon appeal constitutes in proportional solution, because (i) protects effectively and timely the law which requires immediate satisfaction, (ii) among that the existing alternative solutions in the legal system reveals itself less harmful to legal security, to the extent that provides immediate effect only to those sentences that really need it, and not to all, thereby preventing the inversion of the damage risk to the parts resulting from the risk of the anticipatory provision irreversibility, as with the adoption of the ope legis immediate effective rule. Thus, constitutes valid, healthy and in full compliance choice to the constitutional model of Civil Procedure, because it protects at the same time, two of the most expensive and essential values and fundamental rights of paternal constitutional order: the effectiveness and legal certainty, given, thereby, the principle of practical harmonization of values to the extent of factual and legally conceivable. / No sistema processual p?trio (CPC de 1973 e CPC novo), vigora a regra da suspensividade dos efeitos da senten?a na hip?tese de interposi??o de recurso de apela??o, a qual ? excepcionada pelo legislador apenas para determinadas categorias de senten?a previstas taxativamente no C?digo de Processo Civil e, externamente a este, na legisla??o extravagante. O problema central da exist?ncia desta regra ? o fato de constituir obst?culo intranspon?vel ? efetividade daquelas senten?as que n?o possuem efic?cia imediata por for?a da lei, mas que, entretanto, dela necessitam por tutelar direito material em risco de dano ou perecimento, e que, deste modo, sequer pode aguardar o prazo de interposi??o do recurso cab?vel para ser satisfeito e entregue ao seu titular, problema este que, portanto, deve ser enfrentado ? luz do conte?do processual da Constitui??o Federal de 1988 e dos direitos fundamentais aplic?veis ao processo civil, e com destaque especial, do direito-garantia fundamental ? tutela jurisdicional adequada, tempestiva e efetiva. Tanto no CPC de 1973, quanto no CPC novo, a solu??o ? encontrada no pr?prio plano jurisdicional atrav?s da aplica??o da t?cnica de concess?o da efic?cia imediata ope judicis, ou seja, atrav?s da utiliza??o do provimento antecipat?rio na senten?a ou em grau recursal com o fim de afastar o efeito suspensivo e liberar a execu??o imediata. Para verificar a legitimidade da solu??o proposta, o trabalho valeu-se do m?todo de aplica??o do princ?pio da proporcionalidade proposto por Robert Alexy, por meio do qual constatou-se que a t?cnica da efic?cia imediata ope judicis da senten?a implementada atrav?s da aplica??o do provimento antecipat?rio no ato sentencial ou em grau recursal constitui solu??o proporcional, pois (i) tutela eficazmente e tempestivamente o direito que exige satisfa??o imediata; e (ii) dentre as alternativas de solu??o existentes na ordem jur?dica se revela a menos prejudicial ? seguran?a jur?dica, na medida em que concede efic?cia imediata apenas ?quelas senten?as que realmente dela necessitam, e n?o descriteriosamente a todas, evitando deste modo a invers?o do risco de dano ?s partes decorrente do risco de irreversibilidade do provimento antecipat?rio, como ocorre com a ado??o da regra da efic?cia imediata ope legis. Portanto, constitui escolha v?lida, salutar e em total conformidade ao modelo constitucional do processo civil, pois resguarda a um s? tempo dois dos mais caros e imprescind?veis valores e direitos fundamentais do ordenamento constitucional p?trio: a efetividade e a seguran?a jur?dica, atendendo, assim, o princ?pio da harmoniza??o pr?tica de valores na medida do f?tico e juridicamente poss?vel.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6004 |
| Date | 26 February 2015 |
| Creators | Fensterseifer, Shana Serr?o |
| Contributors | Macedo, Elaine Harzheim |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito, PUCRS, Brasil, Faculdade de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -1046629855937119302, 600, 600, 600, 2194221341323903125, -7277407233034425144 |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds