Return to search

The effect of the Reaset Approach on the autonomic nervous system, state-trait anxiety and musculoskeletal pain in patients with work-related stress: A pilot study

Background: Work-related stress (WRS) is associated with musculoskeletal pain (MSP), changes in the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and anxiety.

Objective: To determine the feasibility of a follow-up study and treatment efficacy of the Reaset Approach on MSP, ANS and State-Trait anxiety.

Methods: 15 subjects with WRS and MSP were assigned into 3 groups (Body, Head-Neck, Head-Neck-Body). Each group received a single 25 minute ‘Reaset Approach’ intervention. Heart rate variability (HRV), electro-dermal activity (EDA), State Trait Anxiety (STAI) and MSP were measured.

Results: HRV parameters: SDNN increased in 13 of 15 subjects while SD1 and SD2 increased in 12 of 15 subjects. EDA reduced in 10 of 14 subjects. State Anxiety reduced in all subjects and Trait Anxiety reduced in 14 of 15 subjects. MSP reduced in all subjects after the intervention and were still lower three days afterwards.
Conclusions: This pilot study determined that a follow-up study can ensue provided minor modifications are implemented and that the ‘Reaset Approach’ has an influence on the ANS, anxiety and MSP. Results do differ between groups. The intervention groups including the head and neck modalities demonstrated better results.:I. Abstract (En) III
II. Abstract (De) IV
III. Table of Contents V
IV. Index of figures VIII
V. Index of tables IX
VI. Index of abbreviations X
1 Introduction 1
2 Background 2
2.1 Work-related musculoskeletal pain 2
2.2 Work-related stress 3
2.3 Osteopathy and the autonomic nervous system 3
2.4 Stress, pain and osteopathy 4
3 Questions 6
3.1 Feasibility 6
3.2 Treatment effect 6
4 Methods 7
4.1 Study design 7
4.2 Participants 8
4.2.1 Inclusion criteria 8
4.2.2 Exclusion criteria 8
4.2.3 Recruitment 8
4.2.4 Randomization 10
4.3 Parameters 11
4.3.1 Heart rate variability 11
4.3.2 Electro-dermal activity 11
4.3.3 State anxiety 11
4.3.4 Trait anxiety 12
4.3.5 Perceived pain 12
4.4 Measuring Instruments 13
4.4.1 Heart rate variability 13
4.4.2 Electro-dermal Activity 13
4.4.3 State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 13
4.4.4 Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 13
4.5 Interventions 14
4.5.1 Intervention ‘B’: Body 14
4.5.2 Intervention ‘HN’: Head and Neck 16
4.5.3 Intervention ‘HNB’: Head, Neck and Body 16
4.6 Study flow 18
4.7 Statistics 20
5 Results 21
5.1 Autonomic nervous system: Heart rate variability 21
5.1.1 SDNN 22
5.1.2 SD1 25
5.1.3 SD2 28
5.2 Autonomic Nervous System: Electro-dermal activity 31
5.3 Anxiety 34
5.3.1 State anxiety 34
5.3.2 Trait anxiety 37
5.4 Musculoskeletal pain 39
5.4.1 Visual analogue scale 40
5.4.2 Total Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 43
6 Discussion 46
6.1 Discussion of the method 46
6.2 Discussion of the results 50
6.2.1 Autonomic nervous system 50
6.2.1.1 Heart rate variability 50
6.2.1.2 Electro-dermal activity 51
6.2.2 Anxiety 51
6.2.2.1 State anxiety 51
6.2.2.2 Trait Anxiety 52
6.2.3 Musculoskeletal pain 52
6.3 Suggestions for future research 53
7 Conclusion 54
8 Literature 55
9 Addendum 63
9.1 Table: SF-MPQ with Sensory, Affective and Evaluative dimension 63
9.2 Patient Information Sheet 64
9.3 Structured telephone interview 70
9.4 Structured pre-treatment interview 72
9.5 SF-MPQ permission 73
9.6 SF-MPQ 74
9.7 STAI License 76
9.8 STAI forms Y-1 and Y-2 77 / Hintergrund: Arbeitsbedingter Stress (ABS) ist verbunden mit muskelschmerzen, Veränderungen im autonomen Nervensystem (ANS) und Angst.

Ziel: Machbarkeit einer Follow-up-Studie und Wirksamkeit der Behandlung des Reaset Ansatzes auf ANS, Muskelschmerzen und State und Trait- Angst bestimmen.

Methoden: 15 Patienten mit ABS und Muskelschmerzen wurden in 3 Gruppen eingeteilt (Körper, Kopf-Hals, Kopf-Hals-Körper). Jede Gruppe erhielt eine einzige 25 Minuten dauernde 'Reaset Approach’-Behandlung. Herzfrequenzvariabilität (HRV), elektro-dermale Aktivität (EDA), State-Trait-Angstsinventar (STAI) und Muskelschmerzen (SF-MPQ) wurden gemessen.

Ergebnisse: Die HRV-wert: SDNN ist bei 13 von 15 Probanden erhöht, während SD1 und SD2 bei 12 von 15 Probanden zugenommen hat. EDA war bei 10 von 14 Probanden reduziert. Die State-Angst hat bei allen Probanden und die Trait-Angst bei 14 der 15 Probanden abgenommen. Muskelschmerzen waren bei alle Probanden anschließend an und drei Tage nach der Intervention reduziert.
Schlussfolgerung: Diese Pilotstudie hat gezeigt, dass eine Follow-up-Studie fortgesetzt werden kann, sofern kleinere Änderungen durchgeführt werden. Die 'Reaset Approach’ hat einen günstigen Einfluss auf die ANS, State-Trait-Angst und Muskelschmerzen. Ergebnisse zwischen den Gruppen sind unterschiedlich. Die Interventionsgruppen mit einschließlich der Kopf-Hals-Modalitäten zeigten bessere Ergebnisse..:I. Abstract (En) III
II. Abstract (De) IV
III. Table of Contents V
IV. Index of figures VIII
V. Index of tables IX
VI. Index of abbreviations X
1 Introduction 1
2 Background 2
2.1 Work-related musculoskeletal pain 2
2.2 Work-related stress 3
2.3 Osteopathy and the autonomic nervous system 3
2.4 Stress, pain and osteopathy 4
3 Questions 6
3.1 Feasibility 6
3.2 Treatment effect 6
4 Methods 7
4.1 Study design 7
4.2 Participants 8
4.2.1 Inclusion criteria 8
4.2.2 Exclusion criteria 8
4.2.3 Recruitment 8
4.2.4 Randomization 10
4.3 Parameters 11
4.3.1 Heart rate variability 11
4.3.2 Electro-dermal activity 11
4.3.3 State anxiety 11
4.3.4 Trait anxiety 12
4.3.5 Perceived pain 12
4.4 Measuring Instruments 13
4.4.1 Heart rate variability 13
4.4.2 Electro-dermal Activity 13
4.4.3 State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 13
4.4.4 Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 13
4.5 Interventions 14
4.5.1 Intervention ‘B’: Body 14
4.5.2 Intervention ‘HN’: Head and Neck 16
4.5.3 Intervention ‘HNB’: Head, Neck and Body 16
4.6 Study flow 18
4.7 Statistics 20
5 Results 21
5.1 Autonomic nervous system: Heart rate variability 21
5.1.1 SDNN 22
5.1.2 SD1 25
5.1.3 SD2 28
5.2 Autonomic Nervous System: Electro-dermal activity 31
5.3 Anxiety 34
5.3.1 State anxiety 34
5.3.2 Trait anxiety 37
5.4 Musculoskeletal pain 39
5.4.1 Visual analogue scale 40
5.4.2 Total Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 43
6 Discussion 46
6.1 Discussion of the method 46
6.2 Discussion of the results 50
6.2.1 Autonomic nervous system 50
6.2.1.1 Heart rate variability 50
6.2.1.2 Electro-dermal activity 51
6.2.2 Anxiety 51
6.2.2.1 State anxiety 51
6.2.2.2 Trait Anxiety 52
6.2.3 Musculoskeletal pain 52
6.3 Suggestions for future research 53
7 Conclusion 54
8 Literature 55
9 Addendum 63
9.1 Table: SF-MPQ with Sensory, Affective and Evaluative dimension 63
9.2 Patient Information Sheet 64
9.3 Structured telephone interview 70
9.4 Structured pre-treatment interview 72
9.5 SF-MPQ permission 73
9.6 SF-MPQ 74
9.7 STAI License 76
9.8 STAI forms Y-1 and Y-2 77

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:21584
Date January 2014
CreatorsMeyers, Tom
ContributorsThiel, Bettina, Schmidt, Tobias, Dresden International University
Source SetsHochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typedoc-type:bachelorThesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, doc-type:Text
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.003 seconds