Return to search

Welche Kompetenz hat Wissenschaftsphilosophie?

Many prominent scientists have pointed out that philosophy is of no benefit to science. Stephen Hawking asserts: Philosophy is dead!

Sciences use conceptions like natural laws, matter, nature, theories, etc. But science is also confronted with questions such as: "What is a natural law?" "What is nature?" "What is matter?" and "What is a scientific theory?" These (metatheoretical) questions exceed the sphere of competence of science – they are items of the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science is a metatheory of science. The Philosophy of science overlaps epistemology, ontology, and metaphysics by exploring whether scientific results are true, or whether entities like quarks or electrons really exist. More detailed investigations bring various questions into consideration such as: "How do we define the boundaries between different scientific disciplines?" "Is there a relation between the beauty and the truth of a scientific theory?" and "How do we distinguish between science and pseudoscience?" Additionally, the philosophy of science is concerned with ethical problems of modern technology, with the methodological questions, with the reconstruction of the structure and the development of scientific theories, and with revealing of any indoctrination of science.

The optimistic conclusion of this paper is: Philosophy is still alive – but the philosopher has to participate in round-table discussions with scientists. We just want philosophers talking to scientists!:I. Über die Kompetenz und Inkompetenz von Philosophie 09
II. Philosophie und Wissenschaft 12
III. Philosophische Rückverweise in den Naturwissenschaften 15
IV. Kompass wissenschaftsphilosophischer Kompetenz 26
01. Ontologische Kompetenz 28
02. Epistemologische Kompetenz 28
03. (Meta-)Methodenkompetenz 29
04. Kompetenz der logisch-begrifflichen Analysen 30
05. Metaphysische Kompetenz 30
06. Begründungskompetenz 31
07. Kompetenz der philosophisch motivierten Antizipation 33
08. Rekonstruktionskompetenz (historisch und systematisch) 34
09. Die Abgrenzungskompetenz 38
10. Grenzziehungskompetenz 38
11. Antinomien- und Krisenmanagement-Kompetenz 39
12. Kooperationskompetenz 42
13. Ethische Kompetenz 42
14. Deideologisierungskompetenz 45
15. Ästhetische Kompetenz 46
16. Inkompetenzdestruktionskompetenz 51
Ausblick 53
Abkürzungen 55
Literatur 55

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:19698
Date January 2012
CreatorsHerrmann, Kay
ContributorsTechnische Universität Chemnitz
PublisherUniversitätsverlag der Technischen Universität Chemnitz
Source SetsHochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden
LanguageGerman
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typedoc-type:lecture, info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture, doc-type:Text
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Relationqucosa:19793

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds