在創意經濟的時代，創意階級被視為當代驅動經濟成長的引擎。Florida認為一個城市只要能吸引創意階級聚集，就能促進當地的經濟發展，其主張以職業別區分之創意資本較以教育程度區分之人力資本更能夠解釋區域經濟的發展。為驗證此一論點，本文以創意階級為分析對象，針對台灣都市地區進行實證，首先分析台灣地區創意階級之空間聚集程度與創意資本累積情形，進一步探討創意階級群聚、創意資本與傳統人力資本對區域經濟發展之影響效果。本研究發現台灣的創意階級聚集於主要都市地區，而創意階級群聚指標對區域經濟發展之影響效果不如創意資本指標。又創意資本指標比傳統人力資本指標更能夠解釋對區域經濟發展的影響效果。 / In the era of creative economy, the creative class is regarded as the engine of contemporary economic growth. Florida argued that cities and regions that have attracted creative workers subsequently perform better than other cities and regions. He acclaimed that the creative indicators measured by occupation are better than the traditional human capital indicators measured by education explain the regional economic development. To verify this discussion, we develop a model to examine the influence of the cluster of creative class, creative capital and human capital on regional economic development. Across our sample of Taiwan, we find that creative class measures tend to outperform conventional educational measures in accounting for regional development. The expertise in specific area is much more important than diploma. And what people learn should be connected to what people actually do that can be productive and urge the economic engine run.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0104257002 |
| Creators | 廖雅虹, Liao,Ya-Hung |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds