家族檔案最重要的功能除了提供後世子孫瞭解先人生活的歷史紀錄外，也是追本溯源的重要來源之一。由追溯家族史之風，呈現家族檔案之重要性，以及家族檔案在建構家族歷史時，發揮其最大功效。家族檔案與家族史兩者息息相關，在今日重視臺灣家族史發展的同時，若能具備完整的家族檔案，對於追溯家族歷史必能達到事半功倍之效。完善的家族檔案，不僅能夠真實反映家族的歷史紀錄，並能提供後世子孫瞭解前人過去的生活方式及生命歷程。
本研究採用「個案研究法」與「深度訪談法」進行研究，主要訪談對象包括：中央研究院臺灣史研究所、臺北市文獻委員會、國立中央圖書館臺灣分館、國立臺灣博物館、國史館臺灣文獻館、宜蘭縣史館六所單位，以瞭解家族檔案蒐藏情況。藉由此六個單位蒐藏家族檔案情況，以瞭解目前國內家族檔案管理現況，並分析國內家族檔案相關典藏單位對於家族檔案管理之見解。
根據實際訪談的結果，提出結論如下：一、各蒐藏單位對於「家族檔案」認知及定義不一；二、各蒐藏單位蒐藏內容以古文書及族譜為主；三、各單位蒐藏之古文書及族譜資料多有重複現象；四、各單位蒐藏方式不甚相同；五、家族檔案使用者多為學術研究居多；六、家族檔案蒐藏價值以多面向作為考量。
針對前述研究結果提出七項建議：一、儘速制定家族檔案管理之法源依據；二、釐清家族檔案定義及範圍；三、採行集中或分散式家族檔案管理模式；四、建置全國性家族檔案檢索目錄機制；五、建立全民家族檔案意識；六、建立蒐藏家族檔案特色館；七、積極推動公共圖書館蒐藏地方文獻及服務的功能。 / Family records are not only a historical resource for later generations to understand the lives before them, but also an essential way to trace back their origins. Investigating family histories is becoming more and more common nowadays. Family records, closely related to family histories, are playing a crucial role when structuring family histories. At present, the development of Taiwanese family histories is put emphasis on. Tracing back one’s family histories will be much easier and more efficient if family records are complete. Complete family records include genuinely reflecting a family’s history records and also providing a resource of past lives to pass on to later generations.
This research aims at understanding the management of family records. Two methods are adopted, ‘individual research’ and ‘in-depth interview. Six institutes are studied, including, 1. Institute of Taiwan History, AcademiaSinica, 2. Taiwan Historica, 3. Taipei City Archives, 4. National Taiwan Library, 5.National Taiwan Museum, 6. Institute of Yilan County History. By investigating the collection in the six institutes, an idea of how family records are assorted in Taiwan will be obtained. The results also show different viewpoints that each institute holds when managing family records.
The conclusion made according to the results of actual interviews is as following: 1. Each institute holds a different view on defining ‘family records’. 2. The collections in the six institutes are mainly old English and family trees. 3. Overlaps frequently occur between institutes. 4. The adopted methods are not the same. 5. Family records are mostly used for the purpose of academic researches. 6. Family records are collected with diverse values.
In response to the results of this research, suggestions are stated as follows: 1. Set up regulations to manage family records as soon as possible. 2. Make clear the definition and the scope of family records. 3. Manage family records with the methods of either centralization or decentralization. 4. Create national wide catalogues. 5. Raise people’s awareness of family records. 6. Establish characteristics galleries where store family records. 7. Encourage public libraries to include collections of local cultural document and service.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0941550151 |
| Creators | 劉美伶 |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds