本研究之目的為瞭解教育擴張和教育機會之關係，而所選取衡量教育機會是否均等之指標為性別及地區。原始數據資料主要參照教育部出版之中華民國教育統計，進行時間數列分析、ｔ考驗、集群分析，並計算基尼係數之後，所得之重要發現如下：
1. 未來三年，高級中等教育學生學齡人口在學率仍會不斷擴張，且甚至會達到90%，而且，校數也會不斷的擴張。
2. 在高級中等教育之大眾型中，男生的學齡人口在學率大於女生，進入普及型後，情況成相反。
3. 以高級中等教育的基尼係數而言，並未隨著教育擴張而逐漸下降。而在中部的三個縣市，台中縣、彰化縣與南投縣，在大眾型與普及型中，都是屬於校數低密度區。
4. 在高等教育方面，未來三年，不論是校數、學生數以及學齡人口在學率，仍會不斷的擴張，而學齡人口在學率，甚至會擴張至40.77%左右。
5. 在高等教育之菁英型中，男生的學齡人口數大於女生，在大眾型時，情況成相反，女生的學齡人口在學率大於男生。
6. 以高等教育的基尼係數而言，隨著教育擴張而逐漸下降，菁英型在0.4左右，大眾型則在0.3左右，顯示教育擴張從菁英型進入大眾型之後，各地區的高等教育校數分布變得較均等。不過，宜蘭縣，以及中部的台中縣、彰化縣、南投縣和雲林縣，還有台南市，在教育擴張的兩個時期都屬於低密度區。
根據研究結果，進行討論，並提出建議如下：
1. 若增設中部之高級中等教育機構，優先考量中部縣市。
2. 若增設高等教育機構，應優先考慮中部與東部。
3. 減緩非低密度縣市高級中等教育學校之增設。 / The purpose of the present study is to understand the relationship between education expansion and opportunity of education. For measuring opportunity of education, "gender" and "location" is chosen to be the variables. The data mainly from Education Statistics of the Republic of China is analyzed with time-series, t-test, cluster as well as Gini-coefficient. Important findings are the follows：
1. At senior secondary education level, not only the enrollment rates but also the number of schools will expand in three years. The enrollment rate is supposed to be 90%.
2. Male enrollment rates are higher than female's, while senior secondary education is at mass type. But as it is at universal type, female enrollment rates become higher than male's rates.
3. Gini coefficient of senior secondary education is not descending with education expansion. At mass type and universal type, the central counties, inclusive of Taichung County, Changhua Cunty and Nantou County, belong to the low-density districts.
4. At higher education level, the enrollment rates, the number of schools and students will expand in three years. The enrollment rate is supposed to reach 40.77% or so.
5. Male enrollment rates are higher than female's, while higher education is at elite type. But as it is at mass type, female enrollment rates become higher than male rates.
6. Gini coefficient of higher education is descending with education expansion. At elite type, the coefficient is about 0.4, and it is about 0.3 at mass type. Consequently it indicates that the apportion of schools in counties(cities) becomes more homogeneous. Nevertheless, some counties still belong to the low-density districts at these two types. They are Ilan County, Taichung County, Changhua Cunty, Nantou County, Yunlin county, as well as Tainan City.
The present research makes some suggestions below：
1. If Government wants to set up senior secondary schools, the location which must be considered first are central counties.
2. If higher education institutions are to be established, the priority of location should be in the East and Central of Taiwan first.
3. Establishing senior secondary schools in non-low-density districts should be restrained.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/A2002001064 |
| Creators | 吳昭芳 |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0029 seconds