合理科學的高級中學學校評鑑指標體系不僅是教育主管機關檢測學校辦學績效的需要，更是促進學校經營品質提高的指南。目前政府正在推動十二年國民基本教育政策，現有的高級中學學校評鑑指標體系尚存在不同教育主管機關之間的差異問題，因此，需要建構符合十二年國民基本教育實施後新的高級中學學校評鑑指標體系。
本研究的評鑑指標體系是在理性分析的基礎上，首先對指標體系構建的理論基礎、依據、原則進行分析，依據十二年國民基本教育子方案「高中校務評鑑實施方案」，並參考國際相關評鑑指標架構的經驗，確定本研究高級中學學校評鑑指標體系架構。據此擬訂高級中學學校評鑑指標適切性問卷初稿，蒐集焦點團體座談和專家問卷調查的改進建議，增刪、修正部分指標及其內涵說明。其次，依模糊德菲術問卷調查結果，以模糊權重值的高低評選高級中學評鑑指標，經歸一化處理確定權重從而建構本研究之評鑑指標體系，作為高級中學學校評鑑實施之參考。
本研究構建的評鑑指標體系分為「層面、指標及指標內涵說明」，第一級評鑑層面包括校長領導、行政管理、課程教學、學務輔導、環境設備、社群互動、績效表現七個層面。各層面所占權重分別為「課程教學」權重為20.04%、「學務輔導」權重為18.05%、「績效表現」權重為15.76%、「行政管理」權重為13.85%、「環境設備」權重為12.09%、「校長領導」權重為10.55%、「社群互動」權重為9.67%；第二級評鑑指標計50個，每個評鑑指標所占權重介於1.8%至2.2%之間。 / Reasonable and scientific senior high school evaluation indicator system not merely fulfills the need of education authorities to evaluate the performance of a school; it also guides a school in terms of enhancing the quality of school management. Currently the government has been implementing 12-year basic education, and there are disparities within the existing senior high school evaluation indicator systems employed by different education authorities. A new senior high school evaluation indicator system that will meet the need of 12-year basic education, therefore, needs to be set up.
The evaluation indicator system of this study is based on rational analysis. In accordance with the “The Implementation Scheme of Senior High School Evaluation” of “12-Year Basic Education” and with reference to international evaluation indicators, this study, for one thing, analyzes the theoretical framework, bases, and principles of indicator system. A first draft of a questionnaire concerning the appropriateness of senior high school evaluation indicators is then drawn up. With the suggestions for revision deriving from the conferences of focus groups and experts’ survey, some indicators and their connotations have been added and revised. For the other thing, with the results of the survey using Fuzzy Delphi Method, the value of the fuzzy weight is normalized and used to select senior high school evaluation indicators. The evaluation indicator system of this study is thus established, which is intended to serve as a reference for the implementation of senior high school evaluation.
The evaluation indicator system of this study comprises dimensions, indicators, and their connotations. The first-order evaluation dimension consists of seven dimensions, including principal’s leadership, administrative management, curriculum and teaching, guidance of student affairs, facilities, community interactions, and performance. The weight of each dimension is 0.11, 0.14, 0.20, 0.18, 0.10, 0.10, and 0.16 respectively. The second-order evaluation includes 50 indicators, and the weight of each indicator is between 1.8% and 2.2%.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0989110051 |
| Creators | 李詩慶, Lee, Shih Ching |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0198 seconds