第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機 第二節 研究目的 第三節 研究範圍 第四節 研究方法 第二章 理論文獻之探討 第一節 評鑑概念之釐清 第二節 評鑑的意義和目的 第三節 評鑑的模式及其比較 第四節 評鑑的設計與執行 第五節 學校評鑑及其實施 第六節 再評鑑 第七節 評鑑結果之運用 第三章 實際評鑑概況 第一節 我國歷年學校評鑑概況 第二節 美國中等學校評鑑概況 第四章 我國六十九學年度國中評鑑工作之分析 第一節 國中評鑑的設計與實施 第二節 摘要與分析 第五章 我國國中評鑑與理論模式及美國中等學校評鑑之比較 第一節 國中評鑑與理論模式之比較 第二節 國中評鑑與美國中等學校評鑑之比較 第六章 結論與建議 第一節 結論 第二節 建議

「學校自我評鑑」係指學校自發性針對學校行政、教學(育)、設備、師資等全方位之評估與檢視，藉以全面瞭解辦學成效，俾利改進缺失、克服困難，發揮學校經營優勢，導引校務發展。 本研究的主要重點可以分成下列三點來說明： （一）透過文獻分析的方式探討高級中學自我評鑑的方法及模式，並透過此模式研訂學校自我評鑑指標及評鑑指標規準。 （二）研究方法係利用概念構圖原理(concept mapping)，研擬學校校務自我評鑑指標。 （三）建立校務自我評鑑檢核表、指標權重的統計方式及整體自我評鑑評結果分數的呈現。 透過此方式，學校評鑑參與人員，根據學校組織情境與需求所診斷的結果為本位，在自發、自主的內在動機下，發揮自身的潛能，確其優勢，以解決問題與缺失，促進改善，並在所面臨的外在環境可能擁有的機會下，發揮學校最大效能，以發展其特色的一種學校評鑑的歷程。 關鍵字：學校自我評鑑 概念構圖法 學校評鑑指標 / The school self-evaluation refers to the omni-directional evaluation and inspection coming from the school spontaneity in view of school administration, teaching, equipment and teachers. By means of the appraisal, we may comprehensively realize the school effect in order to improve flaw, overcome difficulties, display the superiority of the school management and guide the school development. The primary intention of the research is redacting the index of school self-evaluation. The research technique uses the Concept Mapping to draw up the self-evaluation index of the school and transfer the index as the questionnaire survey tool about school self- evaluation meter. It could be the important reference for school self-evaluating and school improvement in senior high school. Through the way, the participates in self-evaluation, according to the diagnostic result from the school organization situation and the demand, do themselves justice in potential under spontaneous and independent intrinsic motives, determine its superiority and solve problems and flaws to promote improvement. Besides, bring as much potency as school can into play and develop school characteristic as a kind of school evaluation under the possible opportunity in the external environment. Keywords：School self-evaluation Concept Mapping Indicator of School self-evaluation

合理科學的高級中學學校評鑑指標體系不僅是教育主管機關檢測學校辦學績效的需要，更是促進學校經營品質提高的指南。目前政府正在推動十二年國民基本教育政策，現有的高級中學學校評鑑指標體系尚存在不同教育主管機關之間的差異問題，因此，需要建構符合十二年國民基本教育實施後新的高級中學學校評鑑指標體系。 本研究的評鑑指標體系是在理性分析的基礎上，首先對指標體系構建的理論基礎、依據、原則進行分析，依據十二年國民基本教育子方案「高中校務評鑑實施方案」，並參考國際相關評鑑指標架構的經驗，確定本研究高級中學學校評鑑指標體系架構。據此擬訂高級中學學校評鑑指標適切性問卷初稿，蒐集焦點團體座談和專家問卷調查的改進建議，增刪、修正部分指標及其內涵說明。其次，依模糊德菲術問卷調查結果，以模糊權重值的高低評選高級中學評鑑指標，經歸一化處理確定權重從而建構本研究之評鑑指標體系，作為高級中學學校評鑑實施之參考。 本研究構建的評鑑指標體系分為「層面、指標及指標內涵說明」，第一級評鑑層面包括校長領導、行政管理、課程教學、學務輔導、環境設備、社群互動、績效表現七個層面。各層面所占權重分別為「課程教學」權重為20.04%、「學務輔導」權重為18.05%、「績效表現」權重為15.76%、「行政管理」權重為13.85%、「環境設備」權重為12.09%、「校長領導」權重為10.55%、「社群互動」權重為9.67%；第二級評鑑指標計50個，每個評鑑指標所占權重介於1.8%至2.2%之間。 / Reasonable and scientific senior high school evaluation indicator system not merely fulfills the need of education authorities to evaluate the performance of a school; it also guides a school in terms of enhancing the quality of school management. Currently the government has been implementing 12-year basic education, and there are disparities within the existing senior high school evaluation indicator systems employed by different education authorities. A new senior high school evaluation indicator system that will meet the need of 12-year basic education, therefore, needs to be set up. The evaluation indicator system of this study is based on rational analysis. In accordance with the “The Implementation Scheme of Senior High School Evaluation” of “12-Year Basic Education” and with reference to international evaluation indicators, this study, for one thing, analyzes the theoretical framework, bases, and principles of indicator system. A first draft of a questionnaire concerning the appropriateness of senior high school evaluation indicators is then drawn up. With the suggestions for revision deriving from the conferences of focus groups and experts’ survey, some indicators and their connotations have been added and revised. For the other thing, with the results of the survey using Fuzzy Delphi Method, the value of the fuzzy weight is normalized and used to select senior high school evaluation indicators. The evaluation indicator system of this study is thus established, which is intended to serve as a reference for the implementation of senior high school evaluation. The evaluation indicator system of this study comprises dimensions, indicators, and their connotations. The first-order evaluation dimension consists of seven dimensions, including principal’s leadership, administrative management, curriculum and teaching, guidance of student affairs, facilities, community interactions, and performance. The weight of each dimension is 0.11, 0.14, 0.20, 0.18, 0.10, 0.10, and 0.16 respectively. The second-order evaluation includes 50 indicators, and the weight of each indicator is between 1.8% and 2.2%.