• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 19
  • 19
  • Tagged with
  • 19
  • 19
  • 19
  • 19
  • 14
  • 11
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
  • 6
  • 6
  • 6
  • 6
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

新竹縣市國民中學教師評鑑指標建構之研究

彭春蘭 Unknown Date (has links)
國立政治大學教育學系九十一年度碩士論文摘要 論文名稱:新竹縣市國民中學教師評鑑指標建構之研究 指導教授:湯志民博士研究生:彭春蘭 本研究旨在探討國民中學教師評鑑理念內涵、理論基礎,了解新竹縣市教育人員對指標看法的差異,以建構新竹縣市國民中學教師評鑑指標。 本研究以新竹縣市地區公立國民中學教育人員,包括校長、主任、組長、教師等為母群體, 以「新竹縣市國民中學教師評鑑指標調查問卷」為工具,以簡單隨機抽樣方式,對新竹縣市國中教育人員,抽取樣本893份,進行問卷調查。問卷資料採T考驗(T-Test)、單因子變異數分析(one-way ANOVA)、多因子變異數分析及雪費事後比較(Scheffe' Posterior Comparisons)分析等方法。獲得重要結論與具體建議如下。 壹、重要結論 一、獲致「國民中學教師評鑑」重要理念與內涵。 二、國民中學教師評鑑的理論基礎包括「動機理論」、「學習型組織理論」、「績效責任理論」與「生涯發展理論」。 三、新竹縣市國民中學不同「性別」與不同「組織參與」教育工作人員對整體指標體系看法沒有顯著差異。 四、新竹縣市國民中學不同任教「地區」教育人員在「學生輔導」、「教學設計」及「專業態度」層面上有顯著性差異。 五、新竹縣市國民中學不同「學歷」教育人員在「學生輔導」及「教學實施」層面上有顯著差異。 六、新竹縣市國民中學不同服務「年資」教育人員在「教學設計」、「專業態度」層面有顯著差異。 七、新竹縣市國民中學任教不同學校「規模」教育人員在「專業態度」層面上有顯著差異。 八、新竹縣市國民中學不同「職務」的教育人員在「學生輔導」、「教學設計」、「專業態度」層面指標有顯著差異。 九、新竹縣市不同類別教育人員對「新竹縣市國民中學教師評鑑指標」層面之間看法部分有差異。 十、新竹縣市國民中學教師評鑑指標包括「學生輔導」、「教學設計」、 「專業態度」及「教學實施」等四個層面,共計四十六個指標內容。 貳、研究建議 本研究依據文獻探討與問卷調查統計分析之研究結論,提出教師評鑑指標應用與教師評鑑相關研究建議如下: 一、評鑑指標體系可做為國民中學教師平日工作自我檢核的依據。 二、評鑑指標體系可做為國中教師年終工作績效考核應用。 三、評鑑指標體系的應用需考量不同類別教師的觀點。 四、評鑑指標體系可作為建立學校本位評鑑計畫依據。 五、評鑑指標體系可作為師資師資培訓機構與教師在職進修課程設計的參酌。 六、重視國民中學教師在「學生輔導」與「教學實施」層面指標內容的工作支持與知識能力需求。 七、培養國中教育人員專業研究、學習分享、團隊工作及社區參與的觀念與行動。 八、加強國民中學教師評鑑制度研究。 九、加強國民中學教師評鑑制度研究 十、繼續國民中學教師評鑑指標的研究。 關鍵詞:新竹縣市、國民中學教師、教師評鑑指標。 / 【abstract】This research aims to study the connotation and basic theory about junior high school teacher evaluation.and to try to understand Hsinchu district teachers' different opinions on indexes system.Acorrding to the research material,we try to set up“Hsinchu's junior high school teacher evaluated indexes.” The members of this research is to rest on Hinchu district public junior high school education members ,including principal、managers and teachers as mother body,simple draw 894 copies of questionnaire to be the investigation samples in total. This research uses “ a research questionnaire for hsinchu jumior high school teacher evaluated indexes“ as a tool.T-test,One way ANNOVA ,MANNOVA、Scheffe' Posterior Comparisons and Pearson correlation are used to analyze the information getting from the above mentioned tools. Important conclusions are obtained as follows: 1. This research has gotton the important conceptions and connotations on the evaluation system of junior high school teachers. 2. The basic theories of junior high school teacher evaluation include: motive theory ,learning organization theory,accountability theory and career development theory. 3. The participating teachers from different sex and different organization show the some views on evaluation indexes. 4. The teachers from different district show different views on some indexes about student counselling ,instruction designing and professional attitude items. 5. The teachers from different academic background show differenf views on some indexs about student counselling and instruction practicing items. 6. The teachers from different service years show differenf views on some indexs about instruction designing and professional attitude items. 7.The teachers from different school scale show differenf views on some indexes about professional attitude item. 8.The teachers from different funtion of office show differenf views on some I indexes about student counselling,instruction designing and professional attitude items. 9.The teacher in different background elements still exist some different views on the evaluation indexes. 10.There are 4 items and 46 indexes in Hsinchu district’s junior high school teacher evaluation index system which includes“student counselling”、“instruction design”、“professional attitude” and“instruction practicing”. According to above conclusions,some suggestions are give as follows: 1. The evaluation indexes system can be applied as the base of self-daily check of junior high school. 2. The evaluation indexes system can be utilized as The evaluation indexes system can bethe junior high school teachers' annual assessment. 3. The application of evaluation indexes system must consider the viewpoints from different categories of teachers. 4. The evaluation indexes system can be used as the foundation of school-based evaluation plan. 5. The evaluation indexes system can be applied as the reference of teacher foster organization and on-job training curriculum design. 6. School masters should pay more attention on the demand of teachers' knowedge and ability about student counselling and instruction practicing 7. To cultivate the concepts and motions of the junior high school teachers' professional research ,learning share ,teamw.rk and community. 8. To enhance the research on teacher's evaluation system. 9. To keep on the research on the indexes of junior high school teachers’ evaluation . Key words:Hsinchu county,Junior high school teacher,Teacher evaluation index. II
2

高級中學學校自我評鑑指標建構之研究

劉鈞銓 Unknown Date (has links)
「學校自我評鑑」係指學校自發性針對學校行政、教學(育)、設備、師資等全方位之評估與檢視,藉以全面瞭解辦學成效,俾利改進缺失、克服困難,發揮學校經營優勢,導引校務發展。 本研究的主要重點可以分成下列三點來說明: (一)透過文獻分析的方式探討高級中學自我評鑑的方法及模式,並透過此模式研訂學校自我評鑑指標及評鑑指標規準。 (二)研究方法係利用概念構圖原理(concept mapping),研擬學校校務自我評鑑指標。 (三)建立校務自我評鑑檢核表、指標權重的統計方式及整體自我評鑑評結果分數的呈現。 透過此方式,學校評鑑參與人員,根據學校組織情境與需求所診斷的結果為本位,在自發、自主的內在動機下,發揮自身的潛能,確其優勢,以解決問題與缺失,促進改善,並在所面臨的外在環境可能擁有的機會下,發揮學校最大效能,以發展其特色的一種學校評鑑的歷程。 關鍵字:學校自我評鑑 概念構圖法 學校評鑑指標 / The school self-evaluation refers to the omni-directional evaluation and inspection coming from the school spontaneity in view of school administration, teaching, equipment and teachers. By means of the appraisal, we may comprehensively realize the school effect in order to improve flaw, overcome difficulties, display the superiority of the school management and guide the school development. The primary intention of the research is redacting the index of school self-evaluation. The research technique uses the Concept Mapping to draw up the self-evaluation index of the school and transfer the index as the questionnaire survey tool about school self- evaluation meter. It could be the important reference for school self-evaluating and school improvement in senior high school. Through the way, the participates in self-evaluation, according to the diagnostic result from the school organization situation and the demand, do themselves justice in potential under spontaneous and independent intrinsic motives, determine its superiority and solve problems and flaws to promote improvement. Besides, bring as much potency as school can into play and develop school characteristic as a kind of school evaluation under the possible opportunity in the external environment. Keywords:School self-evaluation Concept Mapping Indicator of School self-evaluation
3

公立高中教師教學評鑑指標建構之研究

卓子瑛 Unknown Date (has links)
本研究主要在於建構公立高中教師教學評鑑指標,以供公立高中教師教學自我評鑑之用,並提供教育行政單位實施教師教學評鑑之參考。 為達到上述目的,本研究透過文獻探討,參考Danielson(2007)教學專業實踐架構(Professional practice-a framework for teaching)、德州(1986)教學視導系統(Texas teacher appraisal system,TTAS)、麻薩諸塞州(2005)中小學教師有效教學原則(Principles of effective teaching),形成評鑑指標初稿,再以半開放式德懷術專家問卷調查法,進行指標審查、修正與刪減。問卷回收後應用SPSS統計軟體中之敘述統計進行分析,以平均數、中位數、眾數判斷評鑑指標之重要性,以四分差判斷專家群看法之一致性。經由前後三次德懷術問卷調查統計分析之結果,獲得以下結論: 一、就教學評鑑領域的重要性而言,其重要性依次為:教學規劃準備、班級經營管理、呈現有效教學、實現專業責任。 二、就「教學規劃準備」指標重要性而言,其排序為「1」者有6項,分別為「1-1-2,1-2-1,1-2-2,1-2-4,1-3-1,1-4-4」;排序為「2」者有9項,分別為「1-1-3,1-1-4,1-2-3,1-3-2, 1-3-4,1-4-2, 1-4-3,1-5-1, 1-5-2」。 三、就「班級經營管理」指標重要性而言,其排序為「1」者有7項,分別為「2-1-3,2-2-2,2-3-1,2-3-3, 2-4-2,2-4-4, 2-5-2」;排序為「2」者有7項,分別為「2-1-1,2-1-2,2-1-4, 2-2-4, 2-3-4,2-4-1,2-5-1」。 四、就「呈現有效教學」指標重要性而言,其排序為「1」者有7項,分別為「3-1-1,3-1-2,3-3-3,3-4-1,3-4-4, 3-5-1, 3-5-2」;排序為「2」者有10項,分別為「3-1-3,3-1-4,3-2-1, 3-2-2,3-2-4,3-3-1,3-3-2,3-3-4,3-4-3, 3-5-3」。 五、就「實現專業責任」指標重要性而言,其重要性等級排序為「1」者有4項,分別為「4-1-3,4-1-4,4-3-1,4-4-1」;排序為「2」者有7項,分別為「4-1-1,4-1-2,4-2-1,4-3-3,4-5-1, 4-5-3,4-5-4」。 六、就專家群看法的一致性而言,其四分差數值介於.000至.500之間,顯示專家群的看法具高度一致性。 七、就教學評鑑指標之建構內容而言,本研究建構之教學評鑑指標包括(一)教學規劃準備;(二)班級經營管理;(三)呈現有效教學;(四)實現專業責任。4個領域,及20個規準、57個指標項目。 關鍵字:教育評鑑、教學評鑑、評鑑指標 / The thesis attempts to build teaching evaluation indicators for senior high school teachers. The indicators will be the reference both for teachers who want to self- assess, and for senior-high school administration which want to evaluate performance of teachers. The teacher evaluative indicators are derived from famous teaching evaluative indicators: “Professional practice-a framework for teaching”(Danielson, 2007), “Texas teacher appraisal system, TTAS” (1986), and “Principles of effective teaching from Massachusetts Department of Education”(2005). Later, the raw indicators are reviewed, revised, and decreased by “semi-open Delphi”. After analysed by SPSS, here comes 7 conclusions below, according to analyse the outcomes of questionnaire survey: 1) On importance of teaching evaluation area, the sequence is: planning and preparation, the classroom environment, effective instruction, professional and responsibility. 2) On importance of planning and preparation, the most important indicators are consistent of “1-1-2,1-2-1,1-2-2,1-2-4,1-3-1,1-4-4”, the second important indicators are consistent of “1-1-3,1-1-4,1-2-3,1-3-2, 1-3-4,1-4-2, 1-4-3,1-5-1, 1-5-2”. 3) On importance of the classroom environment, the most important indicators are consistent of “2-1-3,2-2-2,2-3-1,2-3-3, 2-4-2,2-4-4, 2-5-2”, the second important indicators are consistent of “2-1-1,2-1-2,2-1-4, 2-2-4, 2-3-4,2-4-1, 2-5-1”. 4) On importance of effective instruction, the most important indicators are consistent of “3-1-1,3-1-2,3-3-3,3-4-1,3-4-4, 3-5-1, 3-5-2”, the second important indicators are consistent of “3-1-3,3-1-4,3-2-1, 3-2-2,3-2-4,3-3-1, 3-3-2,3-3-4,3-4-3, 3-5-3”. 5) On importance of professional and responsibility, the most important indicators are consistent of “4-1-3,4-1-4,4-3-1,4-4-1”, the second important indicators are consistent of “4-1-1,4-1-2,4-2-1,4-3-3,4-5-1, 4-5-3,4-5-4”. 6) On coherence of professionals, lies between.000 and.500, shows highly coherence among professionals. 7) On content of teaching evaluation indicators, the evaluative indicators for senior high school teachers include 4 areas: 1. Planning and preparation, 2. the classroom environment, 3. Effective instruction, 4. Professional and responsibility. These 4 areas are consistent of 20 standards and 57 indicators. Keywords: education evaluation, teaching evaluation, evaluation indicators
4

高等技職教育經營績效評估之實證研究-以北部某技術學院為例 / Performance Assessment of Higher Technological and Vocational Education:An Empirical Study of Academic Departments at an Institute of Technology

蔡佩樺 Unknown Date (has links)
本研究應用資料包絡分析法(Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA),探討技術學院教學單位之經營效率與績效評估模式,並以個案為例,分析各系之辦學績效。 本研究對象為該技術學院7個系科單位,使用97至99學年度間之各系所填報之校務基本資料,採其平均數,本研究以資料包絡分析法的投入導向CCR及BCC模式分別探討三個構面(整體規劃、教學及研究)之經營績效,在整體規劃構面,選擇一個投入變數(教師數)及二個產出變數(學生人數及就業人數);在教學構面選擇二個投入變數(助理教授以上人數、每週授課時數)及一個產出變數(畢業生人數);在研究構面,選擇一個投入變數(專任助理教授以上人數)及二個產出變數(論文發表篇數及計畫申請件數)。分別衡量各系之整體效率、技術效率、規模效率、參考集合分析及差額變數分析,探討各系在各面向之相對經營效率。研究結果指出,財政稅務系表現最佳,資訊管理系及財務金融系在各面向上與其他單位相對不具效率,最後提出各受評單位之效率值與改善目標,並與教育部評鑑結果作比較,探討資料包絡分析法是否可作為教育部評鑑工具之一,提供具體的管理資訊,減少投入及增加產出,使受評估單位瞭解自我改善空間及方向,作為未來政策擬定之方針,並提供管理者客觀的決策及管理控制之資訊,以建立有效的經營管理評估機制,提高辦學績效。
5

我國高級中學學校評鑑指標建構之研究

李詩慶, Lee, Shih Ching Unknown Date (has links)
合理科學的高級中學學校評鑑指標體系不僅是教育主管機關檢測學校辦學績效的需要,更是促進學校經營品質提高的指南。目前政府正在推動十二年國民基本教育政策,現有的高級中學學校評鑑指標體系尚存在不同教育主管機關之間的差異問題,因此,需要建構符合十二年國民基本教育實施後新的高級中學學校評鑑指標體系。 本研究的評鑑指標體系是在理性分析的基礎上,首先對指標體系構建的理論基礎、依據、原則進行分析,依據十二年國民基本教育子方案「高中校務評鑑實施方案」,並參考國際相關評鑑指標架構的經驗,確定本研究高級中學學校評鑑指標體系架構。據此擬訂高級中學學校評鑑指標適切性問卷初稿,蒐集焦點團體座談和專家問卷調查的改進建議,增刪、修正部分指標及其內涵說明。其次,依模糊德菲術問卷調查結果,以模糊權重值的高低評選高級中學評鑑指標,經歸一化處理確定權重從而建構本研究之評鑑指標體系,作為高級中學學校評鑑實施之參考。 本研究構建的評鑑指標體系分為「層面、指標及指標內涵說明」,第一級評鑑層面包括校長領導、行政管理、課程教學、學務輔導、環境設備、社群互動、績效表現七個層面。各層面所占權重分別為「課程教學」權重為20.04%、「學務輔導」權重為18.05%、「績效表現」權重為15.76%、「行政管理」權重為13.85%、「環境設備」權重為12.09%、「校長領導」權重為10.55%、「社群互動」權重為9.67%;第二級評鑑指標計50個,每個評鑑指標所占權重介於1.8%至2.2%之間。 / Reasonable and scientific senior high school evaluation indicator system not merely fulfills the need of education authorities to evaluate the performance of a school; it also guides a school in terms of enhancing the quality of school management. Currently the government has been implementing 12-year basic education, and there are disparities within the existing senior high school evaluation indicator systems employed by different education authorities. A new senior high school evaluation indicator system that will meet the need of 12-year basic education, therefore, needs to be set up. The evaluation indicator system of this study is based on rational analysis. In accordance with the “The Implementation Scheme of Senior High School Evaluation” of “12-Year Basic Education” and with reference to international evaluation indicators, this study, for one thing, analyzes the theoretical framework, bases, and principles of indicator system. A first draft of a questionnaire concerning the appropriateness of senior high school evaluation indicators is then drawn up. With the suggestions for revision deriving from the conferences of focus groups and experts’ survey, some indicators and their connotations have been added and revised. For the other thing, with the results of the survey using Fuzzy Delphi Method, the value of the fuzzy weight is normalized and used to select senior high school evaluation indicators. The evaluation indicator system of this study is thus established, which is intended to serve as a reference for the implementation of senior high school evaluation. The evaluation indicator system of this study comprises dimensions, indicators, and their connotations. The first-order evaluation dimension consists of seven dimensions, including principal’s leadership, administrative management, curriculum and teaching, guidance of student affairs, facilities, community interactions, and performance. The weight of each dimension is 0.11, 0.14, 0.20, 0.18, 0.10, 0.10, and 0.16 respectively. The second-order evaluation includes 50 indicators, and the weight of each indicator is between 1.8% and 2.2%.
6

我國青年就業促進政策成效之分析- 以「補助大專校院辦理就業學程計畫」為例 / An Analysis of The Effects of Youth Promoting Employment Policy in Taiwan -The Case Study of Assistance Management of Subsidy Plans for Universities and Colleges Promoting Employment Courses.

周佳玟, Chou, Chia Wen Unknown Date (has links)
青年為國家的棟樑,因此青年勞動力的運用成為國家發展的重要指標,亦為各國政府施政的焦點之一。但在全球化、新興國家崛起、非典型就業興起及高等教育普及的影響下,青年必須與來自國內、外的人才競爭,面對越來越嚴峻的勞動市場。各國青年的就業趨勢主要為:青年失業率高於總體失業率、勞動參與率下降。而許多青年雖然有工作,卻面臨學用落差、工作貧窮和低度就業的困境,長期求職失利的青年則可能成為怯志工作者,此皆不利一國的未來發展。為解決青年就業問題,各國政府透過薪資補貼、職業訓練及就業服務等積極性措施,解決青年就業問題。 本研究係針對當前青年失業問題,政府推出的青年就業促進政策為研究對象,旨在探討青年就業促進政策是否能確實幫助青年就業。由於我國多數青年就業促進計畫為短期性、未長期推動,僅少數計畫能長期施行,本研究以勞動部(原行政院勞工委員會)自92年起推動迄今的「補助大專校院辦理就業學程計畫」為例,並利用財團法人中華民國職業訓練研究發展中心執行98學年度「補助大專校院辦理就業學程計畫」,11,712位參訓學員所填寫之學習成果調查問卷原始檔重新歸納並進行抽樣分析,以計畫受益者角度了解計畫執行過程的優劣進一步分析執行成效,本研究得到的結論如下: 一、參與學員普遍認同職場體驗與課程內容具有關聯性,但是計畫執行前應再加強說明課程和職場體驗的內容。 二、各組別間學員的學習成果雖無顯著差異,但「第三組:服務產業類」學員對各項目評價最高,而「第二組:管理產業類」學員對各項目最低,然總體學習成果卻是「第一組:技術產業類」學員平均數最高。 三、以年齡為變數分析,不同年齡層學員的學習成果有差異,15-19歲學員的學習成果比20-24歲學員的學習成果佳。 根據上述結論,本研究針對計畫執行提出三點建議: 一、計畫執行者應於計畫執行前,讓參與者清楚瞭解計畫內容及完整訊息。 二、針對管理產業領域的課程規劃進行改善,以提升相關領域學員滿意度。 三、因15-19歲學員的學習成果比20-24歲學員的學習成果佳,因此建議從高中階段即推行類似的青年就業促進政策。
7

學效能影響因素及其評鑑指標之探索

卓秀冬, Zuo, Xiu-Dong Unknown Date (has links)
本研究的主要目的在探討台灣省高級職業學校教務行政續效與教學效能之關係,及學校行政人員、學校資源對教務行政續效之影響,並且嘗試建立教務行政續效及教學效能評鑑之指標。本研究以台灣省教育廳統計所編有關高級職業學校的統計資料為主。 並且自編高級業學校教務行政暨教學效能調查表。調查全省八十個公立高級職業學校的教務行政既教學效能有關資料,共得有效樣本七十五個。在研究方法上,以多元迴歸預測高級職業學校行行人員人口變項、學校資源、教務續效指標對教學效能之影響。以單因子多變量分析(One-Way MANOVA)探討高級職業學校不同的教務續效、學校行政人員人口變項、學校資源對教務續效的影響。以因素分析(Factor Analysis) 抽取各變項之共同因素,並且以共變數結構分析(LISREL)探討其因果關係。以 群分析(Cl u ster Analysis)探討各學校教務行政續效、教學效能是否有差異? 玆將主要研究結果臚列於下: (一)學校行政人員的學歷、召開教學研究會的次數、辦理教師進修的次數、教學圖書冊數、依教師專長排課面分比對教師教學知能競賽獲獎有顯著的影響。 (二)學校行政人員的學歷、教務經費、教師總人數、召開教學研究會資料、辦理教師在職進修資料、教務行政電腦化百分比、教學圖畫冊數、依教師專長排課面分比對百位教師研提報告篇數具有顯著影響。 (三)學校行政人員的學歷、教務經費、教師總人數、召開教學研究會資料、辦理教師在職進修次數、教務行政電腦化百分比、教學圖劃冊數、依教專長排課面分比、教師教學知能競賽獲獎數、面位教師研提報告篇數百分率對學生升學率具有顯著的影響。 (四)學校行政人員的學歷、教務經費、召教學研究會次數、辦理教師在職進修資數、教學圖書冊數依教師專長排課百分比、教師教學知能競賽獲獎數、百位數師研提報告編數對學生操行成續達八十分的通過率具有顯著的影響。 (五)教務行政電腦化百分比、依數師專長排課面分比、百位教師研提報告篇數、學校行政人員的學歷對學生技能檢定的通過率具有顯著的影響。 (六)校長學校行政知能、學校行政人員行政知能、學校資源、教務行政續效、教學效能間之因果關係在本研究中并未獲得完全證實,但教務行政續效及學校產能之各評鑑指標都達極顯著水準。 (七)有關高級職業學校教學效能之研究,全部七十五個學校將學生表現投入群集分析共可分成優秀學校(十二個)、良好學校(二十一個)普通學校(二十個),欠佳學校 (二十二個)。將教師教學知能投入群彙分析共可分成優秀學校 (四個)、良好學校 (十二個)、普通學校 (五十八個)。 最後根據研究結果,本研究提出強化教務行政續效、教學效能之具體建議,並對未來之研究方向提出建議。
8

公共圖書館中文版兒童網站評鑑之研究 / The Study of Evaluation Indicators for Chinese Children’s Websites of Public Library

蔡承穎 Unknown Date (has links)
公共圖書館面對網際網路以及兒童上網趨勢所帶來的影響,早已嘗試結合網路與電腦來建置兒童專屬的網站以提供新的兒童服務。然而,為求了解網站使用成效與提升網站之品質,公共圖書館有必要針對兒童網站進行評鑑作業。國外研究者針對兒童網站與網路資源早已建置了許多網站評鑑指標提供圖書員、中小學教師與兒童做為選擇、評鑑網站優劣時之參考,反觀國內相關研究內容則十分缺乏。因此,為求提升國內公共圖書館中文版兒童網站之品質,有必要針對兒童網站進行評鑑研究。 基於上述研究動機本研究首先透過文獻分析法探討兒童網站建置與規劃、兒童資訊需求與資訊尋求行為,以及網站評鑑指標與兒童網站評鑑要項等相關文獻做為本次研究之理論基礎。其次,彙整各領域專家學者所提出之網站評鑑指標並透過問卷調查法蒐集家長對指標重要性之看法以及對網站功能與服務之建議。最後,針對國內公共圖書館中文版兒童網站進行調查研究,了解現行網站之數量並針對12項網站可茲提供之服務內容進行分析比較。 依據研究資料分析,本研究提出相關結論如下: 一、網站評鑑指標:總計共有介面設計與資訊架構、網站內容、網站互動性、多媒體特性以及網站連結品質等五大構面,50項評鑑指標可做為公共圖書館評鑑之依據,研究結論包含:(一)網站內容為家長認為最重要之評鑑構面;(二)教育性、知識性、正確性、適切性、趣味性和新穎性是家長關注的網站內容性質;(三)資訊架構與介面設計構面中家長首重介面設計之易操作性、閱讀性與美觀性;(四)網站互動性功能應以有效協助兒童使用網站為首要目的;(五)網路頻寬為影響多媒體技術和網站連結品質之重要因素。 二、網站內容分析部份:目前國內共有十所公共圖書館提供中文版兒童網站介面,建置單位層級以縣(市)圖書館為主,研究結論包含(一)各館網站服務數量提供不均,數量差距頗大;(二)圖書館基本資料和相關規定、最新消息、館藏查詢、網路資源區、諮詢服務與討論區為網站最常提供的服務項目;(三)各館網站服務內容各有特色,服務名稱採用適合兒童程度之詞彙;(四)部份網站內容有連結錯誤或服務項目無內容之情形;(五)各館缺乏兒童專屬之館藏查詢介面。 最後,本研究提出數點建議如下:一、國內公共圖書館應加速規劃建置中文版兒童網站;二、已建置網站者應加強內容更新與維護;三、從使用者觀點建構優質兒童網站;四、依據年齡層級提供網站分層服務,實施網站分級制度;五、網站可加強規劃討論區、留言板;多媒體資源區;遊戲區和課業資源區服務;六、加強兒童版網站之利用推廣;七、針對現行公共圖書館中文版兒童網站進行評鑑。 / Under the influence of the Internet and children’s use of the Internet, public libraries have already attempted to establish websites exclusively for children in combination of the Internet and computers to offer children new services. However, it is necessary for public libraries to assess websites for children to ensure that they can be effectively used by children. Foreign researchers have already established many assessment indicators on websites and the Internet resources for children for elementary and high school teachers to choose good websites for children. Similar researches are rare in Taiwan. It is, there is necessary to conduct assessment study on websites for children in order to increase the quality for public libraries’ websites in for children. Based on the aforesaid motive, literature reviewed is used to explore documents regarding establishment/planning of children’s websites, children’s information need and information seeking behavior, website assessment indicators and assessment elements, etc as the theory basis of this study. Second, gathering website assessment indicators of specialists and scholars in different fields ,and ideas of parents on website assessment indicators and parents’ suggestions on website functions and services are collected with questionnaires . Finally, twelve items of service from websites are gathered to analyze contents of public libraries’ websites in Chinese for children. In accordance with the research information, the conclusions of this study are: I.Website assessment indicators: There are five major aspects of interface design/information structure, website contents, website interaction, multimedia and link quality. The 50 indicators shall serve as basis of assessment on public libraries. Conclusions include: 1) website contents is the most important assessment aspect to parents; 2) parents care about the education, knowledge, accuracy, appropriateness, fun and novelty in website contents; 3) parents emphasize user-friendliness, readability and esthetic in information structure and interface design; 4) the interaction of websites shall effectively help children to use the sites;and 5)bandwidth is an important factor that influence multimedia technology and link quality. II.Website contents: currently, there are ten public libraries with websites in Chinese for children. The websites are established by county (city) libraries. Conclusions include: 1) quantity of service from each website varies significantly; 2) the most common service items of these websites are: basic information and regulations, latest news, collection inquiry, resources, consultation and discussion areas; 3) each website has its unique characteristics and the names are designed for children’s understanding; 4) some websites have incorrect links or lack of content in certain service items and 5) neither website has collection inquiry exclusively for children. Based on the aforesaid results, the suggestions include: 1) domestic libraries shall expedite planning websites in Chinese for children; 2) those already having websites shall enrich the contents and enhance maintenance; 3) to establish good websites for children in the views of users; 4) implementing leveled services based on age groups; 5) discussion area, message boards, multimedia resources area, games area and class resources area are recommended; 6) enhancing the utilization of websites for children; and 7) conducting assessment on domestic public libraries’ websites in Chinese for children.
9

高級中學輔導工作評鑑指標之研究 / A study on the evaluation indicators of school guidance for senior high school

林劭仁, Lin, Shaw Ren Unknown Date (has links)
基於教育指標在評鑑工作上科學化及客觀化的特性,本研究的目的旨在透過因素分析法建立我國高級中學輔導工作評鑑指標及其權重,並以此解決語意化指標納入指標系統的困難。據此,本研究以自編之「高級中學輔導工作評鑑指標研究問卷」為工具,並以台灣省及台北市公私立高級中學之校長及輔導教師為研究對象。首先進行高級中學輔導評鑑指標之重要性及一致性分析,再以因素分析建立輔導評鑑指標及其權重,其結果如下:   (一)高級中學校長及輔導教師普遍認為「輔導教師的人格特質」是評鑑輔導工作時的最重要指標。其次為「校長對輔導工作的支持程度」、「輔導教師受專業輔導知能訓練合格程度」,可知輔導工作相關人員的素養及投入在評鑑輔導工作時所佔的重要程度。   (二)校長和輔導教師普遍認為輔導工作委員會的存在及運作不適合當作輔導評鑑的指標。顯示出現行高中輔導工作委員會的運作成效及存在受到較多的質疑和討論,面臨較多的改革呼聲。   (三)重要性較高的評鑑指標,其一致性也較高(標準差較小)。代表此些重要的評鑑指標普遍受到校長及輔導教師兩類團體的重視。而觀察較不重要的指標也發現,其不一致性,即爭議性也通常較高。   (四)在校長和輔導教師中,「輔導教師授課時數之多寡」是否適合做為輔導評鑑的指標普遍造成較大的爭議。贊成輔導教師應授課者多認為輔導教師必須多接近學生,才能瞭解學生;而反對者則認為以現有的輔導教師人力上尚嫌不足,授課會減少推行輔導工作的時間,加重輔導教師的工作壓力。   (五)經過因素分析的結果,本研究共抽取出11個輔導評鑑指標。經整理刪除貢獻量低的題項後,將11類指標評鑑指標再度進行二階因素分析,以此計算出輔導評鑑綜合指標及其權重值。   本研究即根據上述研究結果,分別對未來研究和輔導工作推展及評鑑上提出建議,以供後續研究之參考。 / The purpose of this study is to explore evaluation indicators of guidance for senior high school in Taiwan, and also to compared the principals' and the school consultants' opinions in the importance of evaluation indicators. Furthermore, the weights of evaluation indicators of guidance are computed.
10

教育學門系所評鑑指標體系建構之研究 / Research on the evaluation indicators of educational departments and graduate schools of educational discipline

林筠諺, Lin, Yun Yan Unknown Date (has links)
本研究旨在探討教育學門系所評鑑的理論和執行相關課題,並建構教育學門系所評鑑指標權重體系,提供執行教育學門系所評鑑之參考。經由文獻分析,初擬教育學門系所評鑑指標,選取系所評鑑委員和系所主管共計16人為研究對象,使用模糊德懷術建構教育學門系所評鑑指標體系架構,再以網絡分析法建立評鑑指標的相對權重體系。研究結果指出,教育學門系所評鑑指標體系包含行政管理、環境設備、課程規劃、教師教學、學生學習、專業表現、經營成效等七個向度和17個次向度與65項評鑑指標。最後,本研究針對主管教育行政機關、辦理教育學門系所評鑑單位、教育學門系所及後續研究者提出具體建議。 / The study explored the relevant theoretical foundation and practical issues about the evaluation for educational departments and graduate schools. The study also proposed an evaluation indicator weighting system for educational departments and graduate schools in higher education. By reviewing relevant academic literature, the preliminary evaluative indicators were proposed. Sixteen experts who are university program evaluators or chairpersons of departments and graduate schools were the testing samples. This study adopted the Fuzzy Delphi method to build a framework of the evaluation indicator system. In addition, the relative weight of each evaluation indicator was assessed by the Analysis Network Process. The results showed that the conceptual framework of the evaluation indicator system containing 7 dimensions, 17 sub-dimensions, and 65 indicators. The seven dimensions are administrative management, environment and equipments, curriculum planning, faculty’s teaching, student’s learning, professional performance, and operative outcomes. Finally, suggestions were proposed to educational authority, institutions of program evaluation, educational departments and graduate schools, and further researchers.

Page generated in 0.4516 seconds