雖然國內論文對企業併購的研究不在少數,範圍涵蓋併購的動機、類型、績效、策略與法律等,但針對敵意併購的研究則甚少,且研究大多著重於目標公司反接管策略的探討,鮮少對敵意併購後的績效進行討論。因此,本研究欲藉由資料包絡分析法,衡量我國敵意併購目標公司於併購發生後的經營效率變動的情況,及探討國內企業敵意併購之動機。
本研究以1986年至2001年台灣的併購活動為研究對象,實證發現主併者在選擇善意或敵意併購目標時有所差異;主併者選擇在善意併購目標公司時,對於目標公司之經營績效並無特別偏好;但在選擇敵意併購目標公司時,則以經營效率不佳者為對象,並透過敵意併購改善其經營效率;此外,敵意併購目標公司在替換掉管理能力不佳的管理者後,其效率進步的程度大於善意併購目標公司。因此,本研究樣本顯示台灣敵意併購支持懲戒式接管的動機假設。 / / Many scholars did researches on merger and acquisition (M&A) before, and the research scope involved motives, types, performance, strategies and laws of M&A; however, few of them mentioned hostile takeovers. Besides, most of hostile takeovers researches focus on anti-takeovers defenses of target companies, only a few researches discussed about post-takeover performance after hostile takeovers. This research attempts to measure the efficiency change of target companies after hostile takeovers, and discuss the motives of hostile takeovers in Taiwanese enterprises.
The sample year includes Taiwan from 1986 to 2001. The research findings reveal that in the samples of friendly takeovers, there were no specific preference for choosing the targets companies. On the other hand, in the samples of hostile takeovers cases, the research findings denote that most of the target companies were underperformance, which triggers the takeover action. Moreover, the result demonstrates that hostile takeovers present better performance improvement than friendly takeovers do. The findings support hostile takeovers disciplinary motives implication in Taiwan.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0095353004 |
Creators | 林芊芊 |
Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
Language | 中文 |
Detected Language | English |
Type | text |
Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0015 seconds