Return to search

地方政府的政策趨同與政策學習 ─ 1999專線個案研究 / Policy Convergence and Policy Learning of Local Government: A Case of 1999 Citizen Hotline

在全球化與資訊通訊科技的脈絡下,各級政府之間為解決政策問題或改善政策績效而相互進行政策學習已成為趨勢。本研究應用政策趨同以及政策學習理論,分析在國內已形成顯著趨同現象的1999專線政策,並選取新北市政府為個案進行深入探討。研究結果顯示,行政區劃層級為直轄市、位於北部或中部、人口數百萬以上的縣市在1999專線上比較有採納趨同的傾向,趨同縣市在土地面積、高山地區比率、道路里程密度,行政機關公務人員數,以及歲入上也較未趨同縣市為多。在細部的服務機制和委外範圍上,各縣市仍多少有差異,較不完備之縣市則呈現人口數以及歲入較少的特徵。1999專線的趨同力量中並無中央政府的強制力介入,促成趨同的可能原因有觀念普及、政治壓力、競爭壓力、問題壓力,以及創新的認知屬性等因素導致。在政策學習分析的部分,新北市政府學習過程中的關鍵行動者為文官體系所形成的移植網絡,並以臺北市為最主要的學習對象,地理區位的接近性以及由此衍生的過往關係為雙方互動交流的有利基礎。然而新北市與臺北市之間存有結構性差異,無法全盤移植臺北市政府的經驗。本研究也發現,臺北市政府在國內1999專線的政策趨同或政策學習上扮演了重要的關鍵角色,其作為一個中介者向外國政府師法、本土化後將此政策資訊傳播給國內地方政府,成為許多地方政府的學習對象。本研究作為一初探性研究,建議未來除在學術上應豐富有關趨同及學習模式之研究外,並應將政策學習理論結合實務的管理面,建置政策知識庫以及制度化的政策學習網絡,讓地方政府的施政經驗得以保存、累積與流通應用,以作為政策知識管理和學習的有效後盾,提昇政策績效。 / Under the influence of globalization and information and communication technologies, governments at all levels get more chances to learn policy across boundaries as a way to solve policy problem or to enhance policy performance. The thesis applies policy convergence and policy learning theory to analyze the 1999 citizen hotline in Taiwan, takes New Taipei City as a case, and intends to examine the process and contributing factors for policy learning. The results show municipality, located in northern or central Taiwan with population of several million or more, tend to convergence in 1999 citizen hotline. There are some differences between convergence city and non-convergence city in land area, the ratio of total land area of alpine areas, density of the road mileage, number of public servants, and revenue. The possible reasons leading to convergence include the diffusion of concept, political pressure, the pressure of competition, the pressure of problem-solving, and the cognitive attributes of innovation. In the policy learning process of New Taipei City, the key actors are policy transfer network consist of civil servants. Taipei City is the main learning objects of New Taipei City. The proximity of geographic location and past relations is the basis for the interaction between New Taipei City and Taipei City. However, there are structural differences between the two cities; therefore, New Taipei City didn’t photocopy all the details in 1999 citizen hotline of Taipei City. This research also finds that the important role of Taipei City in the policy convergence or policy learning of 1999 citizen hotline. Taipei City, as an intermediary earned from a foreign government, localized the policy, and disseminated policy information to the domestic local governments. Based on the findings, the author suggests the government should construct policy knowledge base, and institutionalize the transfer network to improve policy performance. As an exploratory study, the author also suggests the academics could establish more appropriate convergence models by quantitative statistical analysis, or include more cities to compare models of policy learning in the future.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0096256008
Creators陳序廷, Chen, Hsu Ting
Publisher國立政治大學
Source SetsNational Chengchi University Libraries
Language中文
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
RightsCopyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders

Page generated in 1.0193 seconds