The introduction of the first democratic Constitution and the land reform programme in South
'
Africa provided the impetus for the development of a new perception of property. In terms of the
traditional private law perception property rights are reduced to abstract, scientific concepts
which form part of a hierarchical system of rationally and logically related concepts and
definitions, the relationships between which remain largely unaffected by social and political
realities. In this view the constitutional property clause is interpreted as a guarantee of existing
individual property rights against unwarranted state interference. Proponents of the traditional
private law view argue that this perception of property need not be replaced by a new
constitutional perception of property, because the traditional private law perception is legitimated
by the fact that it developed in an uninterrupted, linear line from Roman law. It is regarded as
flexible enough to adapt to new and different social and political circumstances. However, the
truth is that the development of property rights was disrupted by a number of discontinuities or
fundamental breaks in different periods of its development. It is argued in this thesis that the
introduction of the new constitutional order in South Africa can be regarded as another of these
discontinuities, and that the strict adherence to the private law perception of property may be
abandoned in favour of a new debate on property where the social and political function of
property is emphasised more strongly.
Land reform promotes the public interest in that it ensures the equitable use, distribution and
exploitation of property. In most cases the implementation of land reform necessitates the
limitation of property rights. A conservative judiciary's adherence to the traditional private law
perception of property may lead to a constitutional conflict between the judiciary (that aims to
afford existing property rights strong constitutional protection) and the legislature (that aims to
promote the public interest by implementing land reform). Such a constitutional conflict can be
avoided if the South African courts adopt an approach in terms of which the social and political
role and function of property in society is recognised. / Private Law / LL.D.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:unisa/oai:umkn-dsp01.int.unisa.ac.za:10500/18032 |
| Date | 11 1900 |
| Creators | Erasmus, Johannes |
| Contributors | Van der Walt, A. J. (Andries Johannes), 1956- |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | 1 online resource (xxiii, 507 leaves) |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds