The growth of distributed applications stand on a foundation of containers and their communication and have seen the rise and fall of many implementations throughout the years with a mix of proprietary and open sources. Today there are two implementations widely used as a result of the popularity of the huge project Kubernetes: CRI-O and Containerd. Both with the edge responsibility of managing containers using similar underlying software raising the question; do they have any implications on the containers they spawn? This thesis investigate these implementations from a performance perspective with a custom developed tool for direct communication to them and run a suite of benchmarks within the containers created by each. The suite consists of tests for throughput, latency, cpu, memory, random file read/write and sequential file read/write. Results conclude they perform similarly in all, but the file tests which showed overall CRI-O dominating in write speed and Containerd dominating the read speed.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:lnu-123855 |
| Date | January 2023 |
| Creators | Ärleskog, Albert, Ekström, Daniel |
| Publisher | Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för datavetenskap och medieteknik (DM) |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0027 seconds