This paper applies a modified verison of the ”What’s the problem represented to be” framework developed by Carol Bacchi to analyse the debate currently being had in the USA regarding critical race theory and its supposed dissemination in american K-12 schools. The paper identifies three major differences between the opposing sides in the debate, regarding their presuppositions about the world, what they encapsulate in the term ”crtitical race theory”, and their leanings in regards to party politics.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:lnu-109269 |
| Date | January 2022 |
| Creators | Wennerström, Douglas |
| Publisher | Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för statsvetenskap (ST) |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | Swedish |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0015 seconds