Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-05-30T23:34:36Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Franc-laneSousaCarvalhoDoNascimento_TESE.pdf: 2564183 bytes, checksum: 8ac1bcb87daff0b1c41c2088bbb0e8bf (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-06-02T22:04:05Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
Franc-laneSousaCarvalhoDoNascimento_TESE.pdf: 2564183 bytes, checksum: 8ac1bcb87daff0b1c41c2088bbb0e8bf (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-02T22:04:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Franc-laneSousaCarvalhoDoNascimento_TESE.pdf: 2564183 bytes, checksum: 8ac1bcb87daff0b1c41c2088bbb0e8bf (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-07-17 / As dimens?es pedag?gica, did?tica, tecnol?gica e cient?fica que impactam e subsidiam na forma??o e no desenvolvimento profissional dos professores do s?culo XXI no Brasil e em Portugal. 2015.Tese - PPGEd. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN.No presente trabalho, intitulado: ?As dimens?es pedag?gica, did?tica, tecnol?gica e cient?fica que impactam e subsidiam na forma??o e no desenvolvimento profissional dos professores do s?culo XXI no Brasil e em Portugal? discutimos em que perspectiva esses cursos est?o formando e contribuindo com o desenvolvimento profissional docente, para vivenciar, de modo equilibrado, as referidas dimens?es, como forma de qualificar a pr?tica pedag?gica no contexto do s?culo XXI. Este estudo tem como objeto a forma??o inicial de professores. Delimitamos o seguinte problema de pesquisa: Quais as percep??es, fatores divergentes e convergentes entre esses cursos que formam os professores e sua contribui??o no desenvolvimento profissional e na constru??o das dimens?es pedag?gica, did?tica, tecnol?gica e cient?fica no Brasil e em Portugal? Especificamos como objetivo geral: Estudar, em uma perspectiva comparativa, os cursos de forma??o inicial de professores do Brasil e de Portugal, tendo em vista o desenvolvimento profissional e a import?ncia das dimens?es pedag?gica, did?tica, tecnol?gica e cient?fica. Os procedimentos te?ricos e metodol?gicos norteiam-se na pesquisa qualitativa/quantitativa. Como instrumentos e t?cnicas de pesquisa utilizamos: observa??o, question?rio e a entrevista semiestruturada. Fundamentamo-nos em autores, tais como: Freire (1996); Garc?a (1999); Ramalho, Nu?ez e Gauthier (2004); Houssaye (2004); Pintassilgo e Oliveira (2013); Shulman (2005); Saviani (2008); N?voa (1997); entre outros. Realizamos um estudo do tipo comparativo, com apoio dos documentos oficiais, Leis, Decretos, Pareceres e literatura especializada sobre forma??o de professores. Procedemos ? an?lise seguida de momentos de reflex?es, que propiciaram melhor compreens?o das duas realidades. Assim, defendemos como tese de trabalho, que o Curso de Pedagogia no Brasil e os Mestrados Profissionais em Portugal, como modelos formativos de professores, devem ter como base de conhecimento as dimens?es pedag?gica, did?tica, tecnol?gica e cient?fica, concebidas como refer?ncias orientadoras das pr?ticas educativas dos professores da Educa??o Infantil e dos anos iniciais do Ensino Fundamental, promovendo o desenvolvimento profissional docente e avan?os qualitativos para a Educa??o B?sica. Os resultados da pesquisa apontaram diferen?as e semelhan?as entre os cursos de forma??o de professor, no Brasil e em Portugal. Na forma??o inicial em Portugal h? o predom?nio das dimens?es pedag?gica e cient?fica, em detrimento da did?tica e tecnol?gica. Inclusive, os professores consideram oportuno uma reestrutura??o do curr?culo para aprimorar a utiliza??o das TICs. No Brasil, h? maior relev?ncia nas dimens?es pedag?gica e did?tica, desfavorecendo a tecnol?gica e cient?fica. Os professores e os alunos especificam a necessidade de melhor sistematiza??o do curr?culo para que sejam vivenciadas essas quatro dimens?es. Portanto, nas duas realidades estudadas, as dimens?es n?o est?o sendo trabalhadas de forma equilibrada, o que dificulta o direcionamento de uma forma??o que favore?a, no desenvolvimento profissional docente. No entanto, nos ?ltimos anos, houve a expans?o das fun??es, da ?rea de atua??o; melhoria na oferta de disciplinas; acr?scimo da carga hor?ria das atividades e reformula??o da matriz curricular. Sugerimos que a UEMA e a ESELx repensem a atual forma??o inicial, superem o distanciamento entre teoria-pr?tica e reestruturem o curr?culo, atualizando as dimens?es pedag?gica, did?tica, tecnol?gica e cient?fica, fundamentais para a forma??o do professor, que ensina e educa na escola do s?culo XXI. / In this study, entitled "The pedagogical, didactic, technological and scientific dimensions that training and professional development of teachers in Brazil and Portugal", we discuss in which perspective these courses are forming and contributing to the development of professional teaching, in order to experience those dimensions in a balanced way, aiming to qualify the pedagogical practice in the context of the 21th century. The center of this study is teachers? initial formation. We have defined the following research problem: What are the perceptions, divergent and convergent factors among these initial training courses for teachers, and their contributions relating to professional development and construction of the pedagogical, didactic, technological and scientific dimensions in Brazil and Portugal? Our main objective is analyzing with comparative basis the initial training courses for teachers in Brazil and Portugal, considering professional development and the importance of pedagogical, didactic, technological and scientific dimensions. The theoretical and methodological procedures are guided by qualitative and quantitative research. As instruments and research techniques we have used field observation, questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. We have based ourselves on authors such as Freire (1996); Franco, Lib?neo and Pimenta (20007); Garcia (1999); Ramalho, Nu?ez and Gauthier (2004); Houssaye (2004); Pintassilgo and Oliveira (2013); Shulman (2005); Saviani (2008); N?voa (1997); among others. We have conducted a study according to comparative methodology, by using official documents, laws, decrees, opinions and specialized literature on teacher training. After analyzing those and followed by a reflection period, which provided better understanding of the two realities. Thus, the thesis we defend, is that the Pedagogical Education University Course in Brazil and the Professional Masters in Portugal, as teacher training models, must be based on knowledge about pedagogical, didactic, scientific and technological dimensions, as guiding references for educational practices of teachers engaged to Early Childhood Education and early years of Primary Education, promoting professional teaching development and qualitative improvements of basic education. The survey results showed differences and similarities between teacher training courses in Brazil and Portugal. Initial training in Portugal counts with predominance of pedagogical and scientific dimensions at the expense of didactic and technological ones, and teachers consider propitious curriculum restructuring to improve utilization of ICT. In Brazil, a greater relevance is given to pedagogical and didactic dimensions; disadvantaging the scientific and technological ones. Teachers and students specify the urge to improve the systematization of the curriculum in order to promote these four dimensions experience. Therefore, for the two realities studied, the four dimensions are not being applied in a balanced way, making it difficult to guide a formation that can promote teachers? professional development in the future. However, in the past years, we have experienced the expansion of functions and action fields, the improvement regarding the disciplines offer, the increasing hours of activities and the reformulation of the study programs. We suggest that the UEMA and ESELx, rethink current initial training, overcome the gap between theory and practice and restructure the study programs by updating pedagogical, didactic, scientific and technological dimensions, which are fundamental to form teachers that are teaching and educating in 21th century schools.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/20576 |
| Date | 17 July 2015 |
| Creators | Nascimento, Franc-Lane Sousa Carvalho do |
| Contributors | 13604759404, http://lattes.cnpq.br/1326690619078211, Ferreira, Adir Luiz, 25348787949, http://lattes.cnpq.br/0341824719316863, Diniz, Adriana Valeria Santos, 55249396453, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7196551398849603, Nunez, Isauro Beltran, 00767399455, Fialho, Nadia Hage, 11046120549, http://lattes.cnpq.br/0894339271117102, Ramalho, Betania Leite |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM EDUCA??O, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0028 seconds