Submitted by PPG Ci?ncias Criminais (ppgccrim@pucrs.br) on 2018-04-19T13:11:33Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
EMILIA - Disserta??o - vers?o final biblioteca 16ABR18.pdf: 2213153 bytes, checksum: 09bc679bec6847855d30234e290493fa (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-08T14:06:38Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
EMILIA - Disserta??o - vers?o final biblioteca 16ABR18.pdf: 2213153 bytes, checksum: 09bc679bec6847855d30234e290493fa (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-08T14:14:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
EMILIA - Disserta??o - vers?o final biblioteca 16ABR18.pdf: 2213153 bytes, checksum: 09bc679bec6847855d30234e290493fa (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-01-17 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / The present research is located in the intersection between the critical criminology and the sociology of administration of (criminal) justice. Its proposition is to verify, through empirical research and comparative approach, if the judicial practices of the 4? Juizado da Inf?ncia e Juventude de Porto Alegre are different from the judicial practices of the Vara da Inf?ncia e Juventude do Rio de Janeiro, and which are the speeches that legitimates the judicial practices directed to the accountability of teenagers accused of committing a criminal offense. From a delimited research object and a macrosociological perspective of interpretation, it was intended to elaborate global explanations about the dynamics of the juvenile (penal) justice system and about the ideological motivations of its operators. Therefore, the research started from an analysis of the juvenile justice system from a criminological perspective, and it was reviewed the ideas of the criminological positivism and its influences on the elaboration of the first laws about juvenile justice; in continuation, it was presented the conclusions and critics made from the labeling approach theory, and the effects of the ?minor? label on children and teenagers in ?irregular situation?. To end the first chapter, it was examined the contributions of the critical criminology to the development of the full protection doctrine, and, therefore, for the edition of the Estatuto da Crian?a e do Adolescente, in 1990. The next chapter was destined to the analysis of the juvenile justice system from a normative perspective. It was reviewed the main principals of the juvenile penal justice, the nature of socioeducational measures and the need of recognizing the existence of a Juvenile Penal Law. It was examined the fundamental rights and the procedural guarantees destined to the teenagers accused of committing criminal offenses and the legal steps to establish liability. Ultimately, the last chapter consists in the presentation and analysis of the results obtained in the empirical research. It was presented the data obtained from the exam of archived lawsuits, from the observation of hearings and from the research of Rio de Janeiro and Rio Grande do Sul Tribunal of Justice?s jurisprudence. The conclusion was different from the previous hypothesis: the penal justice system of Rio de Janeiro does not confer more guarantees to the teenagers in comparison to Rio Grande do Sul. It was observed that in both states the remnant of the tutelary logic acts as a basic rule that orientates the judicial decisions and the manifestations of the juvenile justice?s operators, sometimes in opposition to the conquers of the Law 8.069/90. It was verified that the attribution of the judicial competence to the Criminal Court does not deviate the criminological positivism heritage left by the Minor Codes from 1927 and 1979. In conclusion, it was observed the existence of an abysm between theory and practice of the juvenile (penal) justice system. / A presente pesquisa situa-se na intersec??o entre a criminologia cr?tica e a sociologia da administra??o da justi?a (penal). Prop?e-se, a partir de uma pesquisa emp?rica e de uma abordagem te?rica comparativa, verificar se as pr?ticas judiciais do 4? Juizado da Inf?ncia e Juventude de Porto Alegre/RS diferem daquelas da Vara da Inf?ncia e Juventude do Rio de Janeiro/RJ, e quais os discursos legitimadores dessas pr?ticas voltadas ? responsabiliza??o dos adolescentes acusados da pr?tica de ato infracional. Partindo-se de um objeto de pesquisa delimitado, pretendeu-se formular, a partir de uma perspectiva interpretativa macrossociol?gica, explica??es globais sobre as din?micas do sistema de justi?a (penal) juvenil e sobre as motiva??es ideol?gicas das manifesta??es exaradas pelos atores processuais. Para isso, a pesquisa iniciou a partir da abordagem da justi?a juvenil sob um vi?s criminol?gico, revisando-se os postulados da Escola Positiva e das suas influ?ncias na elabora??o das primeiras legisla??es voltadas ? juventude; seguiu-se para a exposi??o das constata??es e cr?ticas formuladas pelos te?ricos do labeling approach, e para os efeitos da aplica??o do r?tulo de ?menor? ?s crian?as e adolescentes em ?situa??o irregular?; para finalizar o primeiro cap?tulo, foram examinadas as contribui??es da criminologia cr?tica para o desenvolvimento da doutrina da prote??o integral e, portanto, para a publica??o do Estatuto da Crian?a e do Adolescente em 1990. O cap?tulo seguinte destinou-se ? an?lise do sistema de justi?a juvenil sob um vi?s normativo, sendo revisados os princ?pios norteadores da justi?a penal juvenil, bem como a natureza das medidas socioeducativas e da necessidade de reconhecimento de um Direito Penal Juvenil. Foram examinados os direitos fundamentais e as garantias processuais dos adolescentes acusados da pr?tica de ato infracional e o rito processual para apura??o da sua responsabilidade. Por fim, o ?ltimo cap?tulo consiste na exposi??o e an?lise da pesquisa de campo efetuada. Apresentaram-se os dados colhidos a partir do exame de autos de processos arquivados, da observa??o de audi?ncias de apresenta??o e de continua??o, bem como a partir da pesquisa de jurisprud?ncia realizada nos Tribunais de Justi?a do Rio de Janeiro e do Rio Grande do Sul. Concluiu-se, diferentemente da hip?tese formulada previamente, que o sistema de justi?a penal carioca n?o confere maiores garantias aos adolescentes em compara??o com o ga?cho, sendo percept?vel, em ambos os locais de observa??o, os resqu?cios da l?gica tutelar que, como metarregra, orienta as decis?es judiciais e as manifesta??es dos atores processuais em sentido contr?rio ?s conquistas consagradas na Lei 8.069/90. Verificou-se, ademais, que a mera atribui??o de compet?ncia ?s c?maras criminais para o julgamento dos recursos interpostos no ?mbito infracional n?o ? capaz de afastar a heran?a positivista deixada pelos C?digos de Menores de 1927 e de 1979. Conclui-se, por fim, que existe um abismo entre a teoria e a pr?tica do sistema de justi?a (penal) juvenil.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8001 |
| Date | 17 January 2018 |
| Creators | Malacarne, Emilia Klein |
| Contributors | Azevedo, Rodrigo Guiringhelli de |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 3263773896050529173, 500, 500, 500, 600, 4512033976268881925, -7277407233034425144, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.0503 seconds