<p><p>Syftet med denna studie var att beskriva hur patienterna upplevde Brännskadeteamets ettårsuppföljning. Studien har en deskriptiv design med såväl kvalitativa som kvantitativa data. Som underlag för studien har en utvärderingsenkät använts, svaren är insamlade under tidsperioden 2001- juni 2008. Svarsfrekvensen var hög (81,4%), 57 patienter av 70 hade besvarat enkäten.</p><p>Bemötandet skattades av samtliga patienter som mycket bra (77,2%) eller bra (22,8%). Samtliga patienter som hade ställt frågor ansåg att de hade fått svar på sina frågor (93%) medan en mindre grupp svarade att de ej hade ställt några frågor (7%). Informationen innan besöket ansågs som dålig eller mindre bra av 4 patienter (7,1%), bra/tillräcklig av 33 patienter (57,9%) och mycket bra av 19 patienter (33,3%). Informationen under besöket ansågs vara bra eller mycket bra av samtliga patienter utom en som klassade den som mindre bra. Fyra av de fem kommentarerna som skrivits till frågorna gällde brister i information och förberedelse. Majoriteten av patienterna (93%) ansåg att tiden för besöket var lagom.</p><p>Brännskadeteamets ettårsuppföljning är unik och den anpassas i möjligaste mån efter varje patients behov. Svaren på enkäten visar att detta lyckats ganska bra, men att informationen innan besöket behöver förbättras.</p></p> / <p><p>The purpose of this study was to describe the burn patients´ experience of the one-year follow-up, with a multidisciplinary team. The study has a descriptive design with both qualitative and quantitative data. An evaluation questionnaire was used to collect data. The answers are collected in the period from 2001 until June 2008. The response rate was high (81.4%), 57 patients out of 70 had responded to the survey.</p></p><p>The patients replied that they were treated very good (77.2%) or good (22.8%). All patients that had asked any questions felt that they had received answers to their questions (93%) a smaller group replied that they had not asked any questions (7%). The information before the visit was considered as poor or less good by 4 patients (7.1%), good/sufficient by 33 patients (57.9%) and very good by 19 patients (33.3%). Information during the visit was considered to be good or very good by all patients except one who rated it as less good. Four out of the five written comments was about issues related to gaps in information and preparation. The majority of all patients (93%) were satisfied with the length of time of the visit.</p><p>The multidisciplinary one-year follow-up, at the Burn Center, is unique and the aim is to adjust the follow-up visit after each patient's needs. The results show that it has succeeded quite well, but that the information given before the visit needs to be improved.</p>
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA/oai:DiVA.org:uu-107142 |
| Date | January 2009 |
| Creators | Eriksson, Anna |
| Publisher | Uppsala University, Caring Sciences |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | Swedish |
| Detected Language | Swedish |
| Type | Student thesis, text |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds