Submitted by Ricardo Cedraz Duque Moliterno (ricardo.moliterno@uefs.br) on 2015-08-03T22:56:26Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
O Curso de Pedagogia o que dizem os egressos sobre o seu lugar de professor alfabetizador - SELMA.pdf: 5116254 bytes, checksum: 9d72b0625f43dc4b9374b51e9cfc5ff4 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-08-03T22:56:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
O Curso de Pedagogia o que dizem os egressos sobre o seu lugar de professor alfabetizador - SELMA.pdf: 5116254 bytes, checksum: 9d72b0625f43dc4b9374b51e9cfc5ff4 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-05-19 / Illiteracy in Brazil is an educational, social and political issue of great importance that creeps along our history, being the education of the alphabetizing teacher one of the factors that needs to be rethought, so that we can overcome it. In this perspective, we ask: how the current educational proposal of the course of pedagogy of UEFS has contributed to the training of literacy teachers? As teachers who are trained in that course feel about the task of teaching reading and writing? The proposition of the Pedagogy Program, according to the Resolution CNE / CP 01/2006, defines teaching as basis for the formation of the pedagogue, and this act primarily in childhood education and the early grades of elementary school, when the procurement processes reading and writing should be consolidated. In this sense, the objective of this work is known prospects of graduates teachers about the importance of the course of pedagogy of UEFS in their own training as literacy teachers. This qualitative study was used as methodological strategies documentary research on the norms of that course and curricular organization (national and local levels) and the semi-structured interviews with five teachers who worked in 1st year classes in 2014, discharged of the course Pedagogy of UEFS. During the research, we approach the different conceptions of literacy that permeate the history of education in Brazil and the various theoretical and methodological insights into the process of literacy looking for directly influence the pedagogical practice of literacy teacher, from theoretical as Ferreiro (2012) Soares (2002, 2004), Britto (2003), Kleiman (2007), Mortatti (2000) and Morais (2006). We also discuss some ideas about curriculum, using as support the contributions of Gimeno Sacrist?n (2000), Veiga-Neto (2002), Goodson (2007) and Silva (1999), passing then to discuss the historical construction of the curriculum of the course pedagogy in Brazil and its relation to the formation of literacy teachers, from authors like Saviani (2012), Lib?neo (2006), Pimenta (1999), Brzezinski (2012) and Scheibe (2007).Finally, we analyze the course of pedagogy of UEFS from regulatory and organizational documents, as well as interviews with teachers, subject of this research, trying to understand the place and the importance of literacy in that course, with the contribution of theoretical above, and Tardif (2011), Brito (2006), N?voa (2009), Weisz (2003), among others. The research signaled, among other things, the persistent lack of identity of course, observed since its genesis, intending, at present, form the teacher to work in early childhood education classes and the early grades of elementary school as well as the specialist to act in the school field and not educational spaces, which promotes swelling and fragmentation of the curriculum, tending to the superficiality and precarious training and; the need for a review of the course of pedagogy of UEFS (as locus of teacher who teaches reading and writing), emphasizing that literacy needs to gain more space on your curriculum, considering the urgent need to qualify the training of teachers for reading and writing education, ensuring all learners the right to enter the world of literacy consciously and competently. / O analfabetismo no Brasil se constitui num problema educacional, pol?tico e social de grande relev?ncia que se arrasta ao longo da nossa hist?ria, sendo a forma??o do professor alfabetizador um dos fatores que precisa ser repensado, a fim de que possamos super?-lo. Nessa perspectiva, questionamos: como a atual proposta pedag?gica do curso de Pedagogia da UEFS vem contribuindo para a forma??o de professores alfabetizadores? Como os professores que s?o formados no referido curso se sentem com rela??o ? tarefa de ensinar a ler e escrever? A proposi??o do Curso de Pedagogia, segundo a Resolu??o CNE/CP 01/2006, define a doc?ncia como base para a forma??o do pedagogo, devendo este atuar, prioritariamente, na Educa??o Infantil e nas s?ries iniciais do Ensino Fundamental, quando os processos de aquisi??o da leitura e da escrita devem ser consolidados. Nesse sentido, o objetivo geral deste trabalho se constitui em conhecer as perspectivas de professores egressos sobre a import?ncia do curso de Pedagogia da UEFS na sua pr?pria forma??o como professores alfabetizadores. Este estudo de car?ter qualitativo, utilizou como estrat?gias metodol?gicas a pesquisa documental sobre as normatiza??es do referido curso e sua organiza??o curricular (em ?mbitos nacional e local) e a entrevista semiestruturada com cinco professoras que atuavam em classes de 1? ano em 2014, egressas do curso de Pedagogia da UEFS.Ao longo da pesquisa abordamos as diferentes concep??es de alfabetiza??o que permeiam a hist?ria da educa??o no Brasil e as diversas compreens?es te?ricas e metodol?gicas sobre o processo de alfabetiza??o que buscam influenciar diretamente a pr?tica pedag?gica do professor alfabetizador, a partir de te?ricos como Ferreiro (2012), Soares (2002, 2004), Britto (2003), Kleiman (2007), Mortatti (2000) e Morais (2006). Discutimos tamb?m, algumas ideias sobre curr?culo, utilizando como suporte as contribui??es de Gimeno Sacrist?n (2000), Veiga-Neto (2002), Goodson (2007) e Silva (1999), passando, em seguida, a discorrer sobre a constru??o hist?rica do curr?culo do curso de Pedagogia no Brasil e sua rela??o com a forma??o de professores alfabetizadores, a partir de autores como Saviani (2012), Lib?neo (2006), Pimenta (1999), Brzezinski (2012) e Scheibe (2007). Por fim, analisamos o curso de Pedagogia da UEFS a partir de documentos normativos e organizacionais, bem como das entrevistas realizadas com as docentes, sujeitos dessa pesquisa, buscando compreender o lugar e a import?ncia da alfabetiza??o no referido curso, contando com a contribui??o dos te?ricos supracitados, al?m de Tardif (2011), Brito (2006), N?voa (2009), Weisz (2003), entre outros. A investiga??o sinalizou, dentre outras coisas, para a persistente aus?ncia de identidade do curso, observada desde a sua g?nese, pretendendo, na atualidade, formar o docente para atuar em classes de Educa??o Infantil e s?ries iniciais do Ensino Fundamental como tamb?m o especialista para atuar no campo escolar e em espa?os n?o educativos, o que promove o incha?o e a fragmenta??o do curr?culo, tendendo para a superficialidade e precariza??o da forma??o e; paraa necessidade de uma revis?o do curso de Pedagogia da UEFS (enquanto l?cus da forma??o do professor que ensina a ler e a escrever), ressaltando que a alfabetiza??o precisa conquistar um maior espa?o em seu curr?culo, considerando que urge qualificar a forma??o docente para o ensino da leitura e da escrita, garantindo a todos os educandos, o direito de ingressar no mundo da cultura letrada de forma consciente e competente.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.uefs.br:8080:tede/150 |
| Date | 19 May 2015 |
| Creators | Mascarenhas, Selma Mendes Souza |
| Contributors | Santos, Solange Mary Moreira |
| Publisher | Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Mestrado Acad?mico em Educa??o, UEFS, Brasil, DEPARTAMENTO DE EDUCA??O |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UEFS, instname:Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, instacron:UEFS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -4285438101026463257, 600, 600, 600, 3298115314873488434, -6857334414802308004 |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds