隨著中國大陸經濟的高度成長，不動產市場也隨之發展。在貸款利率及不動產相關稅負長期偏低之下，住宅產品的投資需求不斷上升，使得房價一路高漲。房屋價格的增幅過大、增速過高，已經超出了合理的範圍。截至2010年，中國大陸推出一系列以抑制房價為主要目的的宏觀調控政策，許多重點城市也陸續推出以“限購令”為主要內容的地方性政策來調控不動產市場。由於中國大陸地幅遼闊，各地的不動產市場因受各種因素影響而發展各異，因此挑選了北京、上海、廣州三個頗具代表性的重點城市作為研究對象。本文應用年租金與加權平均資本成本（WACC）還原基本價值，以其與市場價格間的差距作為泡沫程度的估計，計算出這三個城市2007年至2012年間不動產價格泡沫程度。藉由這三個城市的不動產市場泡沫狀況，運用共整合分析檢視中國城市不動產價格泡沫的影響因素，并以Granger因果關係檢定探討三地不動產價格泡沫與各因素之領先落後關係。
實證結果顯示，人均可支配收入和金融機構各項信貸總額對不動產價格泡沫具有正向影響，不動產價格泡沫則對其本身具有負向影響，而抵押貸款利率與不動產價格泡沫先是正相關而後轉為負相關的關係。而根據Granger因果關係檢定結果，北京不動產價格泡沫落後於金融機構各項貸款總額，而上海不動產價格泡沫領先於人均可支配收入，廣州不動產價格泡沫則落後於人均可支配收入、抵押貸款利率與金融機構各項貸款總額。 / With the rapid economic development in China, the real estate market has been undergoing a great boom. The low interest and tax rates are very favorable for the continuously increasing house demands, and thus resulting in higher housing prices. And the extremely rapidly increasing housing prices are not reasonable. Until 2010, Chinese government had published a series of national housing regulatory decisions to address the over-heating real estate market. And the restrictions on house purchase have been put into practice in some major cities. Given that China has a vast territory with large variety, the impact of these regulations on the local real estate markets of the cities can hardly be determined. Therefore, we study here the real estate market in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, three of the most representative major cities in China. This study evaluates the housing bubbles situations in these cities from 2007 to 2012 by comparing fundamental values with market prices. The fundamental value of real estate can be calculated by annual rents and WACC. Based on the evaluated housing bubbles situations, this study then applies Cointegration analysis to further explore the factors that may contribute to China’s housing bubbles. In addition, Granger causality test is employed to examine the lead/lag relationship between housing bubbles and the variables.
The empirical result shows that per-capita disposable incomes and total loans of financial institutions are positively related to China’s housing bubbles. And the housing bubbles in these three cities are negatively related to themselves. In addition, the impact of interest rates on housing bubbles is positive and later turns negative with respect to the magnitude of increasing rates. According to the results of Granger causality tests, Beijing’s housing bubbles are Granger caused by total loans while property bubbles in Shanghai lead personal incomes. Furthermore, housing bubbles in Guangzhou are Granger caused by personal disposable incomes, interest rates and total loans.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G1012570351 |
| Creators | 黃斐, Huang, Fei |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 英文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds